30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      PERCEPTIONS OF COMPRESSED EARTH BLOCK AMONG RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTORS IN NORTH CAROLINA: AN EXPLORATORY EVALUATION

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Compressed earth blocks (CEB) retain the environmental benefits of traditional earthen construction while reducing labor costs and project duration. Despite these advantages, CEB remains a niche material in the U.S. This study explored residential contractors' perceptions of CEB as a barrier to adoption. A survey was distributed to residential contractors in the North Carolina Piedmont, a region that possesses ideal soil for earthen buildings. Construction professionals in states where earthen construction has a larger market share (New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas) were also queried for comparison. Respondents with no CEB experience provided significantly ( p < 0.05) lower levels of agreement with statements that CEB is cost effective, structurally safe and aesthetically appealing than did respondents with CEB experience. Interviews conducted with an experienced CEB contractor and a manufacturer of CEB production equipment provided additional insight and informed the quantitative results. Findings represent an important step in exploring stakeholder perceptions as an impediment to the adoption of non-conventional materials like CEB in the residential construction sector. Educating the next generation of builders and home-owners is a key component for the implementation of CEB construction. Educational strategies, study limitations and opportunities for further research are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How much more rain will global warming bring?

          Climate models and satellite observations both indicate that the total amount of water in the atmosphere will increase at a rate of 7% per kelvin of surface warming. However, the climate models predict that global precipitation will increase at a much slower rate of 1 to 3% per kelvin. A recent analysis of satellite observations does not support this prediction of a muted response of precipitation to global warming. Rather, the observations suggest that precipitation and total atmospheric water have increased at about the same rate over the past two decades.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Earth construction: Lessons from the past for future eco-efficient construction

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE SELECTION, STABILIZATION, AND COMPACTION OF SOIL FOR RAMMED EARTH WALL CONSTRUCTION

              Rammed earth possesses environmental advantages over most other competing construction materials. However, if it is to be more routinely used in the construction of modern, sustainable buildings, its material properties and production processes must be properly quantified. This paper proposes practical recommendations for soil selection, stabilizer treatment, and on-site compaction for rammed earth, based on a recent set of 219 stabilization experiments. The purpose of the recommendations is to maximize the probability of constructing rammed earth walls that meet or exceed a compressive strength criterion of 2 MPa. The recommendations cover: (1) Quantifying the natural soil properties of linear shrinkage and texture in a staged sequence in order to identify suitable soils to stabilize (and to reject unsuitable soils); (2) Quantifying the amounts of cement and/or lime to be added to the selected soil according to the values of soil properties measured; and (3) Quantifying the forces involved in on-site compaction of stabilized soil (for both manual and pneumatic ramming), and relating these to laboratory-based test standards. Although the recommendations need to be tested and verified/refined using new data, their initial application to rammed earth construction situations in Australia indicates that they have predictive utility. Further research will also indicate the degree of applicability of the recommendations to the production of compressed earth bricks.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jgrb
                Journal of Green Building
                College Publishing
                1552-6100
                1943-4618
                1943-4618
                Fall 2017
                : 12
                : 4
                : 89-108
                Author notes

                1. Project Engineer, Midstate Construction, Petaluma, CA 94954; email: evanh@ 123456midstateconstruction.com

                2. Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 (corresponding author); email: rvaldes@ 123456colostate.edu

                3. Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523; email: jon.elliott@ 123456ucdenver.edu

                Article
                jgb.12.4.89
                10.3992/1943-4618.12.4.89
                9d4cb677-c3a6-49ca-be9a-c3fd06890242
                © 2017 College Publishing
                History
                Page count
                Pages: 20
                Categories
                RESEARCH ARTICLES

                Urban design & Planning,Civil engineering,Environmental management, Policy & Planning,Architecture,Environmental engineering
                Barrier to Adoption,Perceptions,Non-Conventional Materials,Compressed Earth Block

                Comments

                Comment on this article