+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      El plagio académico en la investigación científica. Consideraciones desde la óptica del investigador de alto nivel Translated title: Academic plagiarism in scientific investigation. Considerations from the perspective of a senior researcher


      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          Resumen El objetivo principal de esta investigación es contribuir a la comprensión de las formas en que los investigadores conciben al plagio académico y a quienes incurren en acciones de este tipo. Asimismo, busca comprender la manera en la que los investigadores toman decisiones ante casos de plagio cuando ellos mismos están implicados como evaluadores o editores de publicaciones científicas. Para esta investigación, de corte cualitativo, se utilizaron entrevistas a profundidad para dar cuenta de las experiencias y percepciones narradas por 51 investigadores mexicanos de alto nivel. Los resultados develan contradicciones entre la importancia que los investigadores dicen conceder al plagio y su percepción de cercanía del fenómeno, con las acciones emprendidas por ellos a propósito de éste y las experiencias vividas a lo largo de su trayectoria. Asimismo, permiten identificar algunos de los criterios que prevalecen para tomar la decisión de no ir a fondo en casos de plagio.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract The main objective of this investigation is to contribute to understanding of the ways in which researchers conceive academic plagiarism and the people implicated in cases of plagiarism. In addition, it seeks to understand the way in which researchers make decisions about cases of plagiarism when they are implicated as evaluators or editors of scientific publications. For this investigation of a qualitative nature, in-depth interviews were conducted in order to account for personal experiences and perceptions narrated directly by 51 Mexican senior researchers. The results reveal contradictions in the importance that investigators state they give to plagiarism and their close-up perception of this phenomenon, with the actions they carry out in the face of plagiarism and their experiences over the course of their careers. Moreover, the study permits the identification of some prevailing criteria for deciding not to pursue certain cases of plagiarism fully.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ethical authorship and publishing.

              Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology: 1. That the corresponding author has the approval of all other listed authors for the submission and publication of all versions of the manuscript. 2. That all people who have a right to be recognised as authors have been included on the list of authors and everyone listed as an author has made an independent material contribution to the manuscript.3. That the work submitted in the manuscript is original and has not been published elsewhere and is not presently under consideration of publication by any other journal. The oral or poster presentation of parts of the work and its publishing as a single page abstract does not count as prior publication for this purpose. 4. That the material in the manuscript has been acquired according to modern ethical standards and does not contain material copied from anyone else without their written permission.5. That all material which derives from prior work, including from the same authors, is properly attributed to the prior publication by proper citation.6. That the manuscript will be maintained on the servers of the Journal and held to be a valid publication by the Journal only as long as all statements in these principles remain true.7. That if any of the statements above ceases to be true the authors have a duty to notify the journal as soon as possible so that the manuscript can be withdrawn.

                Author and article information

                Perfiles educativos
                Perfiles educativos
                Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones sobre la Universidad y la Educación (México, DF, Mexico )
                September 2016
                : 38
                : 153
                : 120-135
                [1] orgnameUniversidad de Guadalajara orgdiv1Centro Universitario de la Costa Mexico moniherislas@ 123456gmail.com
                S0185-26982016000300120 S0185-2698(16)03815300120

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                : 15 April 2015
                : 21 July 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 51, Pages: 16

                SciELO Mexico


                Professional ethics,Investigadores,Scientific production,Ética profesional,Investigación científica,Producción científica,Peer review,Scientific research,Researchers,Arbitraje científico


                Comment on this article