0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      An Analysis of Monocyte/Macrophage Subsets and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Expression in Renal Allograft Biopsies

      Nephron

      S. Karger AG

      Renal transplantation, Acute rejection, Macrophage, Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The role of infiltrating macrophages in the pathogenesis of acute rejection was investigated in biopsy specimens obtained from human transplanted kidneys using immunohistochemical methods. Thirty-one allograft tissue specimens obtained from 26 patients were histologically classified into 18 with acute rejection, 7 with borderline change and 6 with chronic rejection according to the Banff working classification (1993). These specimens were analyzed by avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method on frozen sections in order to examine the utility of some antimonocyte/macrophage monoclonal antibodies in differentiating acute rejection from other conditions. The ratio of CD68, CD11b, LeuM3, OKM5 and HAM56-positive infiltrating monocytes/macrophages to leukocyte common antigen (LCA)-positive cells in the renal cortex were calculated. As a result, the ratio of the positive cells for CD68, which stains mature macrophages, significantly increased in the cases of acute rejection compared with those of other groups. In addition, a strong expression of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was observed in the acute rejection group. In our study, the expression of class II major histocompatibility antigens (HLA-DR) in the proximal epithelial tubules was also strongly observed in the cases of acute rejection. It was thus concluded that the increase of CD68-positive infiltrating cells and the expression of GM-CSF may play a possible role as a reaction effector in the process of acute renal allograft rejection.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          NEF
          Nephron
          10.1159/issn.1660-8151
          Nephron
          S. Karger AG
          1660-8151
          2235-3186
          1996
          1996
          19 December 2008
          : 73
          : 4
          : 536-543
          Article
          189137 Nephron 1996;73:536–543
          10.1159/000189137
          8856248
          © 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article