16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The accuracy of Broselow pediatric emergency tape in estimating body weight of pediatric patients

      letter
      ,
      Saudi Medical Journal
      Saudi Medical Journal

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor Thank you for the article published in your journal on behalf of research carried out by ALSulaibikh et al, entitled “The accuracy of Broselow pediatric emergency tape in estimating body weight of pediatric patients”.1 It is encouraging that Saudi researchers have conducted a validation study of the Broselow tape. It is important to validate pediatric weight estimation methods locally because populations are different, and using a weight-estimation tool derived and validated elsewhere in the world might not be appropriate in another setting.2 We also welcome the authors’ recognition that the tape is less useful in older children. ALSulaibikh et al1 showed that in children over 25 kg, height correlates poorly with weight. This is consistent with our finding in a Chinese population that the tape performs badly in children over 10 years old.3 This does raise the question as to what tool should be used instead, in older and larger children. It would be good if the authors could also compare the Broselow tape with age-based formulae,2 the Mercy tape (based on mid-arm circumference and humeral length),4 or the PAWPER tape (based on height, adjusted for body habitus).5 However, if such a study were to be published it would be important to use the most appropriate statistical methods. Correlation is not the correct tool for method comparison: if a method of estimation consistently estimated weight at 50% of the correct value, the correlation would be excellent, but the agreement (or accuracy) would be extremely poor. Bland Altman analysis is the correct method because it gives a measure of trueness (the bias) and precision (the limits of agreement). An additional method is to present the proportion of estimates that lie within 10% or 20% of the true value: this gives an indication of overall accuracy. It is unfortunate that in the present study, with the focus on correlation and without details of the Bland Altman analysis, it is difficult to assess how reliable the Broselow tape really is in Saudi children. Reply from the Author No reply was received from the Author.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The PAWPER tape: A new concept tape-based device that increases the accuracy of weight estimation in children through the inclusion of a modifier based on body habitus.

            Weight estimations in children, which are required when actual weight cannot be measured, are often very inaccurate because of variations in body habitus not accounted for in the estimating methodology. This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the PAWPER tape, a new two-step weight-estimation tape device which employs a length-based habitus-modified weight estimation system.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              An Improved Pediatric Weight Estimation Strategy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Saudi Med J
                Saudi Med J
                Saudi Medical Journal
                Saudi Medical Journal (Saudi Arabia )
                0379-5284
                November 2017
                : 38
                : 11
                : 1159
                Affiliations
                [1] Emergency Medicine King’s College Hospital NHS Trust London, United Kingdom ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8910-2307
                [2] Emergency Medicine Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali Kigali, Rwanda
                Article
                SaudiMedJ-38-1159
                10.15537/smj.2017.11.21075
                5767624
                29114709
                9d94d5fc-4c91-479c-be54-04c0b1cb9532
                Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Correspondence

                Comments

                Comment on this article