56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Subtle in‐scanner motion biases automated measurement of brain anatomy from in vivo MRI

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While the potential for small amounts of motion in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans to bias the results of functional neuroimaging studies is well appreciated, the impact of in‐scanner motion on morphological analysis of structural MRI is relatively under‐studied. Even among “good quality” structural scans, there may be systematic effects of motion on measures of brain morphometry. In the present study, the subjects' tendency to move during fMRI scans, acquired in the same scanning sessions as their structural scans, yielded a reliable, continuous estimate of in‐scanner motion. Using this approach within a sample of 127 children, adolescents, and young adults, significant relationships were found between this measure and estimates of cortical gray matter volume and mean curvature, as well as trend‐level relationships with cortical thickness. Specifically, cortical volume and thickness decreased with greater motion, and mean curvature increased. These effects of subtle motion were anatomically heterogeneous, were present across different automated imaging pipelines, showed convergent validity with effects of frank motion assessed in a separate sample of 274 scans, and could be demonstrated in both pediatric and adult populations. Thus, using different motion assays in two large non‐overlapping sets of structural MRI scans, convergent evidence showed that in‐scanner motion—even at levels which do not manifest in visible motion artifact—can lead to systematic and regionally specific biases in anatomical estimation. These findings have special relevance to structural neuroimaging in developmental and clinical datasets, and inform ongoing efforts to optimize neuroanatomical analysis of existing and future structural MRI datasets in non‐sedated humans. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2385–2397, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Hum Brain Mapp
          Hum Brain Mapp
          10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193
          HBM
          Human Brain Mapping
          John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
          1065-9471
          1097-0193
          23 March 2016
          July 2016
          : 37
          : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/hbm.v37.7 )
          : 2385-2397
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ] Developmental Neurogenomics Unit Child Psychiatry Branch National Institute of Mental Health Bethesda Maryland
          [ 2 ] Department of Psychiatry Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut
          [ 3 ] Brain Mapping Unit University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom
          [ 4 ] Department of Psychiatry UCSD San Diego California
          Author notes
          [*] [* ]Correspondence to: Armin Raznahan, M.D. Ph.D.; Developmental Neurogenomics Unit, Child Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, 10 Center Drive, Bldg 10, Room 4D18, Bethesda, MD 20892‐1600. E‐mail: raznahana@ 123456mail.nih.gov
          Article
          PMC5110234 PMC5110234 5110234 HBM23180
          10.1002/hbm.23180
          5110234
          27004471
          9d96c951-fa6a-400a-9afa-87bf2cfe2136
          © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
          History
          : 13 April 2015
          : 29 February 2016
          : 01 March 2016
          Page count
          Pages: 13
          Categories
          Research Article
          Research Articles
          Custom metadata
          2.0
          July 2016
          Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.2 mode:remove_FC converted:15.11.2019

          bias,functional neuroimaging,magnetic resonance imaging,motion,cortical thickness,cortical surface area,cortical curvature

          Comments

          Comment on this article