67
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Harm Minimization and Tobacco Control: Reframing Societal Views of Nicotine Use to Rapidly Save Lives

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Inhalation of the toxic smoke produced by combusting tobacco products, primarily cigarettes, is the overwhelming cause of tobacco-related disease and death in the United States and globally. A diverse class of alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS) has recently been developed that do not combust tobacco and are substantially less harmful than cigarettes. ANDS have the potential to disrupt the 120-year dominance of the cigarette and challenge the field on how the tobacco pandemic could be reversed if nicotine is decoupled from lethal inhaled smoke. ANDS may provide a means to compete with, and even replace, combusted cigarette use, saving more lives more rapidly than previously possible. On the basis of the scientific evidence on ANDS, we explore benefits and harms to public health to guide practice, policy, and regulation. A reframing of societal nicotine use through the lens of harm minimization is an extraordinary opportunity to enhance the impact of tobacco control efforts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Relationship of E-Cigarette Use to Cigarette Quit Attempts and Cessation: Insights From a Large, Nationally Representative U.S. Survey

          While cessation from cigarettes is a top priority for public health, controversy surrounds the role of e-cigarettes for quitting cigarettes. This study examines the role of e-cigarettes in quit attempts and 3-month cigarette abstinence using a large, recent nationally representative US sample.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How do we determine the impact of e-cigarettes on cigarette smoking cessation or reduction? Review and recommendations for answering the research question with scientific rigor.

            To propose a hierarchy of methodological criteria to consider when determining whether a study provides sufficient information to answer the question of whether e-cigarettes can facilitate cigarette smoking cessation or reduction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early Subjective Sensory Experiences with "cigalike" E-cigarettes Among African American Menthol Smokers: A Qualitative Study.

              Despite smoker interest in e-cigarettes as a harm reduction or cessation aid, many smokers prematurely discontinue vaping after trying a product. This study explored the role of early subjective sensory experience in vaping persistence and desistence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annual Review of Public Health
                Annu. Rev. Public Health
                Annual Reviews
                0163-7525
                1545-2093
                April 2018
                April 2018
                : 39
                : 1
                : 193-213
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA;,
                [2 ]Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC 20001, USA;,
                [3 ]School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA;
                [4 ]Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401, USA;
                Article
                10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013849
                6942997
                29323611
                9d97e5ba-7ce4-4b09-8ac1-d7d90c6e35eb
                © 2018
                History

                Social policy & Welfare,Medicine,Psychology,Engineering,Public health,Life sciences
                Social policy & Welfare, Medicine, Psychology, Engineering, Public health, Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article