49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determination of cell survival after irradiation via clonogenic assay versus multiple MTT Assay - A comparative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For studying proliferation and determination of survival of cancer cells after irradiation, the multiple MTT assay, based on the reduction of a yellow water soluble tetrazolium salt to a purple water insoluble formazan dye by living cells was modified from a single-point towards a proliferation assay. This assay can be performed with a large number of samples in short time using multi-well-plates, assays can be performed semi-automatically with a microplate reader. Survival, the calculated parameter in this assay, is determined mathematically. Exponential growth in both control and irradiated groups was proven as the underlying basis of the applicability of the multiple MTT assay. The equivalence to a clonogenic survival assay with its disadvantages such as time consumption was proven in two setups including plating of cells before and after irradiation. Three cell lines (A 549, LN 229 and F 98) were included in the experiment to study its principal and general applicability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Use of the tetrazolium assay in measuring the response of human tumor cells to ionizing radiation.

          Three human tumor cell lines of widely differing radiosensitivity were used to examine the characteristics of the 3-[4,5-dimethyl(thiazol-2-yl)-3,5-diphery]tetradium bromide (MTT) assay and to select suitable conditions for its use in assessing the response of cells to ionizing radiation. The optimal concentration of MTT and the time of incubation of the cells with MTT were individualized for each cell line. The relationship between absorbance and cell number was not linear over the wide range of cell numbers that were used. A calibration curve of absorbance against cell number for each cell line was therefore used. Using the assay to quantify metabolically viable cells, growth curves of irradiated and unirradiated cells were constructed on days 0-14 after irradiation. Accurate surviving fractions could be calculated only when cells were in exponential growth. Using this modification to its interpretation, the MTT assay was able to provide a reproducible measure of survival, which compared well with clonogenic cell survival measurements. However, the necessity to optimize conditions of the MTT assay for each cell line severely limits its usefulness in determining the radiosensitivity of cells in primary human tumor cultures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of the sulforhodamine B assay and the clonogenic assay for in vitro chemoradiation studies.

            Since there is a growing interest in preclinical research on interactions between radiation and cytotoxic agents, this study focused on the development of an alternative to the very laborious clonogenic assay (CA). The colorimetric sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay was compared to the clonogenic assay for radiosensitivity testing in two lung cancer cell lines (A549, H292), one colon cancer cell line (HT-29) and one breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). In addition, the combination of the radiosensitizing agent gemcitabine and radiation was investigated with both assays. The dose-response curves obtained with the SRB assay and the CA were very similar up to 6 Gy. The radiosensitivity parameters (SF(2), alpha, beta, MID and ID(50)) obtained from the SRB assay and the CA were not significantly different between H292, A549 and MCF-7 cells. The radiation dose-response curves for A549 and H292 cells pretreated with 4 n M gemcitabine for 24 h clearly showed a radiosensitizing effect with both assays. The dose-enhancement factors obtained with the SRB assay and the CA were 1.80 and 1.76, respectively, for A549 cells, and 1.52 and 1.41 for H292 cells. The SRB assay was shown to be as useful as the more traditional CA for research on chemotherapy/radiotherapy interactions in cell lines with moderate radiosensitivity. This assay will be used for more extensive in vitro research on radiosensitizing compounds in these cell lines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Overview of radiosensitivity of human tumor cells to low-dose-rate irradiation.

              We compared clonogenic survival in 27 human tumor cell lines that vary in genotype after low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose rate (HDR) irradiation. We measured susceptibility to LDR-induced redistribution in the cell cycle in eight of these cell lines. We measured clonogenic survival after up to 96 hours of LDR (0.25 Gy/h) irradiation. We compared these with clonogenic survival after HDR irradiation (50 Gy/h). Using flow cytometry, we measured LDR-induced redistribution as a function of time during LDR irradiation in eight of these cell lines. Coefficients that describe clonogenic survival after both LDR and HDR irradiation segregate into four radiosensitivity groups that associate with cell genotype: mutant (mut)ATM, wild-type TP53, mutTP53, and an unidentified gene in radioresistant glioma cells. The LDR and HDR radiosensitivity correlates at lower doses ( approximately 2 Gy HDR, approximately 6 Gy LDR), but not at higher doses (HDR > 4 Gy; LDR > 6 Gy). The rate of LDR-induced loss of clonogenic survival changes at approximately 24 hours; wild-type TP53 cells become more resistant and mutTP53 cells become more sensitive. Redistribution induced by LDR irradiation also changes at approximately 24 hours. Radiosensitivity of human tumor cells to both LDR and HDR irradiation is genotype dependent. Analysis of coefficients that describe cellular radiosensitivity segregates 27 cell lines into four statistically distinct groups, each associating with specific genotypes. Changes in cellular radiosensitivity and redistribution in the cell cycle are strongly time dependent. Our data establish a genotype-dependent time-dependent model that predicts clonogenic survival, explains the inverse dose-rate effect, and suggests possible clinical applications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiation Oncology (London, England)
                BioMed Central
                1748-717X
                2012
                3 January 2012
                : 7
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Staudingerweg 5, 55099 Mainz, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
                Article
                1748-717X-7-1
                10.1186/1748-717X-7-1
                3274452
                22214341
                9daaae95-6baf-4e2c-b627-758454126ab7
                Copyright ©2012 Buch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 6 December 2011
                : 3 January 2012
                Categories
                Methodology

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article