23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emissions and Char Quality of Flame-Curtain "Kon Tiki" Kilns for Farmer-Scale Charcoal/Biochar Production

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Flame Curtain Biochar Kilns

          Pyrolysis of organic waste or woody materials yields charcoal, a stable carbonaceous product that can be used for cooking or mixed into soil, in the latter case often termed "biochar". Traditional kiln technologies for charcoal production are slow and without treatment of the pyrolysis gases, resulting in emissions of gases (mainly methane and carbon monoxide) and aerosols that are both toxic and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. In retort kilns pyrolysis gases are led back to a combustion chamber. This can reduce emissions substantially, but is costly and consumes a considerable amount of valuable ignition material such as wood during start-up. To overcome these problems, a novel type of technology, the Kon-Tiki flame curtain pyrolysis, is proposed. This technology combines the simplicity of the traditional kiln with the combustion of pyrolysis gases in the flame curtain (similar to retort kilns), also avoiding use of external fuel for start-up.

          Biochar Characteristics

          A field study in Nepal using various feedstocks showed char yields of 22 ± 5% on a dry weight basis and 40 ± 11% on a C basis. Biochars with high C contents (76 ± 9%; n = 57), average surface areas (11 to 215 m 2 g -1), low EPA16—PAHs (2.3 to 6.6 mg kg -1) and high CECs (43 to 217 cmol c/kg)(average for all feedstocks, mainly woody shrubs) were obtained, in compliance with the European Biochar Certificate (EBC).

          Gas Emission Factors

          Mean emission factors for the flame curtain kilns were (g kg -1 biochar for all feedstocks); CO 2 = 4300 ± 1700, CO = 54 ± 35, non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) = 6 ± 3, CH 4 = 30 ± 60, aerosols (PM 10) = 11 ± 15, total products of incomplete combustion (PIC) = 100 ± 83 and NO x = 0.4 ± 0.3. The flame curtain kilns emitted statistically significantly (p<0.05) lower amounts of CO, PIC and NO x than retort and traditional kilns, and higher amounts of CO 2.

          Implications

          With benefits such as high quality biochar, low emission, no need for start-up fuel, fast pyrolysis time and, importantly, easy and cheap construction and operation the flame curtain technology represent a promising possibility for sustainable rural biochar production.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A handful of carbon.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars.

            Biochar soil amendment is advocated to mitigate climate change and improve soil fertility. A concern though, is that during biochar preparation PAHs and dioxins are likely formed. These contaminants can possibly be present in the biochar matrix and even bioavailable to exposed organisms. Here we quantify total and bioavailable PAHs and dioxins in a suite of over 50 biochars produced via slow pyrolysis between 250 and 900 °C, using various methods and biomass from tropical, boreal, and temperate areas. These slow pyrolysis biochars, which can be produced locally on farms with minimum resources, are also compared to biochar produced using the industrial methods of fast pyrolysis and gasification. Total concentrations were measured with a Soxhlet extraction and bioavailable concentrations were measured with polyoxymethylene passive samplers. Total PAH concentrations ranged from 0.07 μg g(-1) to 3.27 μg g(-1) for the slow pyrolysis biochars and were dependent on biomass source, pyrolysis temperature, and time. With increasing pyrolysis time and temperature, PAH concentrations generally decreased. These total concentrations were below existing environmental quality standards for concentrations of PAHs in soils. Total PAH concentrations in the fast pyrolysis and gasification biochar were 0.3 μg g(-1) and 45 μg g(-1), respectively, with maximum levels exceeding some quality standards. Concentrations of bioavailable PAHs in slow pyrolysis biochars ranged from 0.17 ng L(-1) to 10.0 ng L(-1)which is lower than concentrations reported for relatively clean urban sediments. The gasification produced biochar sample had the highest bioavailable concentration (162 ± 71 ng L(-1)). Total dioxin concentrations were low (up to 92 pg g(-1)) and bioavailable concentrations were below the analytical limit of detection. No clear pattern of how strongly PAHs were bound to different biochars was found based on the biochars' physicochemical properties.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              One step forward toward characterization: some important material properties to distinguish biochars.

              Terra Preta research gave evidence for the positive influence of charred organic material (biochar) on infertile tropical soils. Facing global challenges such as land degradation, fossil energy decline, water shortage, and climate change, the use of biochar as a soil amendment embedded into regional matter cycles seems to provide an all-round solution. However, little is known about biochar effects on individual ecosystem processes. Besides, the term is used for a variety of charred products. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate principal material properties of different chars to establish a minimum set of analytical properties and thresholds for biochar identification. For this purpose, chars from different production processes (traditional charcoal stack, rotary kiln, Pyreg reactor, wood gasifier, and hydrothermal carbonization) were analyzed for physical and chemical properties such as surface area, black carbon, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and elemental composition. Our results showed a significant influence of production processes on biochar properties. Based on our results, to identify biochar suitable for soil amendment and carbon sequestration, we recommend using variables with the following thresholds: O/C ratio 15% C, polyaromatic hydrocarbons lower than soil background values, and a surface area >100 m g.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                18 May 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 5
                : e0154617
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Oslo, Norway
                [2 ]Institute for Environmental Sciences (IMV), University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway
                [3 ]Nepal Agroforestry Foundation (NAF), Kathmandu, Nepal
                [4 ]Ithaka Institute for Carbon Strategies, Ancienne Eglise 9, Arbaz, Switzerland
                [5 ]Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Technology, Trondheim, Norway
                DOE Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: GC MS HPS. Performed the experiments: GC HPS NRP BHP. Analyzed the data: GC HPS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MS. Wrote the paper: GC MS HPS. Designed the kilns: HPS PT.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-04992
                10.1371/journal.pone.0154617
                4871524
                27191397
                9ddbec89-1a8f-42e1-8906-02b3dee4b535
                © 2016 Cornelissen et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 4 February 2016
                : 17 April 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005416, Norges Forskningsråd;
                Award ID: 217918
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004425, Asian Development Bank;
                Award ID: TA-7984
                Award Recipient :
                The Norwegian Research Council supported the study (grant agreement 217918, program FriPro). The results of this paper are part of the Asia Development Bank project TA-7984 NEP: Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development financed by the Nordic Development Fund and the Government of Nepal under the administrative lead of Landell Mills Ltd, UK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                States of Matter
                Fluids
                Gases
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Chemical Reactions
                Exothermic Reactions
                Combustion
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Chemical Compounds
                Carbon Dioxide
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Environmental Chemistry
                Soil Chemistry
                Cation Exchange Capacity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Environmental Chemistry
                Soil Chemistry
                Cation Exchange Capacity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Soil Science
                Soil Chemistry
                Cation Exchange Capacity
                Physical Sciences
                Materials Science
                Materials by Structure
                Mixtures
                Aerosols
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Crop Science
                Crops
                Cereal Crops
                Rice
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Plants
                Grasses
                Rice
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Model Organisms
                Plant and Algal Models
                Rice
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Farms
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Chemical Compounds
                Methane
                Custom metadata
                Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.58m67.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article