13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biofeedback effect of hybrid assistive limb in stroke rehabilitation: A proof of concept study using functional near infrared spectroscopy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Robot-assisted rehabilitation has been increasingly drawing attention in the field of neurorehabilitation. The hybrid assistive limb (HAL) is an exoskeleton robot developed based on the “interactive biofeedback” theory, and several studies have shown its efficacy for patients with stroke. We aimed to investigate the mechanisms of the facilitative effect of neurorehabilitation using a single-joint HAL (HAL-SJ) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

          Materials and methods

          Subacute stroke patients admitted to our hospital were assessed in this study for HAL eligibility. We evaluated motor-related cortical activity using an fNIRS system at baseline and immediately after HAL-SJ treatment on the same day. Cortical activity was determined through the relative changes in the hemoglobin concentrations. For statistical analysis, we compared the number of flexion/extension movements before and immediately after HAL-SJ treatment using paired t-test. fNIRS used both the methods of statistical parametric mapping and random effect analysis.

          Results

          We finally included 10 patients (eight men, two women; mean age: 66.8 ± 12.0 years). The mean number of flexion/extension movements within 15 s increased significantly from 4.2 ± 3.1 to 5.3 ± 4.1 immediately after training. fNIRS showed increased cortical activation in the primary motor cortex of the ipsilesional hemisphere immediately after HAL-SJ treatment compared to the baseline condition.

          Conclusions

          This study is the first to support the concept of the biofeedback effect from the perspective of changes in cortical activity measured with an fNIRS system. The biofeedback effect of HAL immediately increased the task-related cortical activity, and this may address the functional recovery. Further studies are warranted to support our findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback

            Neurofeedback is a psychophysiological procedure in which online feedback of neural activation is provided to the participant for the purpose of self-regulation. Learning control over specific neural substrates has been shown to change specific behaviours. As a progenitor of brain–machine interfaces, neurofeedback has provided a
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

              The aim of the study was to present a systematic review of studies that investigate the effects of robot-assisted therapy on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke. A database of articles published up to October 2006 was compiled using the following Medline key words: cerebral vascular accident, cerebral vascular disorders, stroke, paresis, hemiplegia, upper extremity, arm, and robot. References listed in relevant publications were also screened. Studies that satisfied the following selection criteria were included: (1) patients were diagnosed with cerebral vascular accident; (2) effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb were investigated; (3) the outcome was measured in terms of motor and/or functional recovery of the upper paretic limb; and (4) the study was a randomized clinical trial (RCT). For each outcome measure, the estimated effect size (ES) and the summary effect size (SES) expressed in standard deviation units (SDU) were calculated for motor recovery and functional ability (activities of daily living [ADLs]) using fixed and random effect models. Ten studies, involving 218 patients, were included in the synthesis. Their methodological quality ranged from 4 to 8 on a (maximum) 10-point scale. Meta-analysis showed a nonsignificant heterogeneous SES in terms of upper limb motor recovery. Sensitivity analysis of studies involving only shoulder-elbow robotics subsequently demonstrated a significant homogeneous SES for motor recovery of the upper paretic limb. No significant SES was observed for functional ability (ADL). As a result of marked heterogeneity in studies between distal and proximal arm robotics, no overall significant effect in favor of robot-assisted therapy was found in the present meta-analysis. However, subsequent sensitivity analysis showed a significant improvement in upper limb motor function after stroke for upper arm robotics. No significant improvement was found in ADL function. However, the administered ADL scales in the reviewed studies fail to adequately reflect recovery of the paretic upper limb, whereas valid instruments that measure outcome of dexterity of the paretic arm and hand are mostly absent in selected studies. Future research into the effects of robot-assisted therapy should therefore distinguish between upper and lower robotics arm training and concentrate on kinematical analysis to differentiate between genuine upper limb motor recovery and functional recovery due to compensation strategies by proximal control of the trunk and upper limb.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Software
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: Validation
                Role: Supervision
                Role: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                16 January 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 1
                : e0191361
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
                [2 ] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
                [3 ] Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
                [4 ] Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
                Tokai University, JAPAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The author have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Article
                PONE-D-17-32097
                10.1371/journal.pone.0191361
                5770063
                29338060
                9de3f61a-7a09-4e0a-b0fd-d3db37679950
                © 2018 Saita et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 1 September 2017
                : 3 January 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 2, Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007449, Takeda Science Foundation;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005738, Central Research Institute, Fukuoka University;
                Award ID: 161042
                Award Recipient :
                Dr. Morishita has no disclosures related to this study. Dr. Morishita has received grant supports from Japan Society for Promotion of Science, St. Luke Life Science Institute, Nakatomi foundation, Takeda Science Foundation, the Uehara Memorial Foundation, and the Central Research Institute of Fukuoka University. He has received honoraria from Medtronic as a consultant within the past 12 months. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Cerebrovascular Diseases
                Stroke
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Vascular Medicine
                Stroke
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Neurorehabilitation
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Rehabilitation Medicine
                Neurorehabilitation
                Engineering and Technology
                Mechanical Engineering
                Robotics
                Robots
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Cerebrovascular Diseases
                Stroke
                Ischemic Stroke
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Vascular Medicine
                Stroke
                Ischemic Stroke
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Cerebrovascular Diseases
                Stroke
                Hemorrhagic Stroke
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Vascular Medicine
                Stroke
                Hemorrhagic Stroke
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Lesions
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Lesions
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Spectrum Analysis Techniques
                Infrared Spectroscopy
                near-Infrared Spectroscopy
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article