38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the ‘RASCAL II’ study

      other
      1 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 10 ,   11 , 11 , 12 , 12 , 13 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 20 , 21 , 21 , 22 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 29 , 30 , 30 , 31 , 31 , 30 , 30 , 30 , 30 , 32 , 32 , 33 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ,   36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 54 , 55 , 56
      British Journal of Cancer
      Nature Publishing Group

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Researchers worldwide with information about the Kirsten ras (Ki-ras) tumour genotype and outcome of patients with colorectal cancer were invited to provide that data in a schematized format for inclusion in a collaborative database called RASCAL (The Kirsten ras in-colorectal-cancer collaborative group). Our results from 2721 such patients have been presented previously and for the first time in any common cancer, showed conclusively that different gene mutations have different impacts on outcome, even when the mutations occur at the same site on the genome. To explore the effect of Ki-ras mutations at different stages of colorectal cancer, more patients were recruited to the database, which was reanalysed when information on 4268 patients from 42 centres in 21 countries had been entered. After predetermined exclusion criteria were applied, data on 3439 patients were entered into a multivariate analysis. This found that of the 12 possible mutations on codons 12 and 13 of Kirsten ras, only one mutation on codon 12, glycine to valine, found in 8.6% of all patients, had a statistically significant impact on failure-free survival ( P = 0.004, HR 1.3) and overall survival ( P = 0.008, HR 1.29). This mutation appeared to have a greater impact on outcome in Dukes’ C cancers (failure-free survival, P = 0.008, HR 1.5; overall survival P = 0.02, HR 1.45) than in Dukes’ B tumours (failure-free survival, P = 0.46, HR 1.12; overall survival P = 0.36, HR 1.15). Ki-ras mutations may occur early in the development of pre-cancerous adenomas in the colon and rectum. However, this collaborative study suggests that not only is the presence of a codon 12 glycine to valine mutation important for cancer progression but also that it may predispose to more aggressive biological behaviour in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Structural differences between valine-12 and aspartate-12 Ras proteins may modify carcinoma aggression.

          Recent evidence associates the codon 12 valine-for-glycine (G12V) mutant Ki-Ras protein with higher stage and increased lethality of colorectal carcinomas, while the codon 12 aspartate-for-glycine (G12D) Ras mutation shows no such association. Several observations may be relevant to this phenomenon. First, GTPase activity of G12V Ras is one-quarter that of G12D Ras and one-tenth that of wild-type (WT) Ras. Second, binding of the GTP analogue GppNp to G12D Ras is 8-fold weaker than its binding to G12V or WT Ras and crystal structures indicate that electrostatic repulsion between the carboxylate group of the G12D Asp-12 side-chain and the gamma phosphate of the bound nucleotide may make GTP binding to G12D Ras weaker even than that of GppNp. It is proposed that this lowering of affinity for GTP allows G12D Ras an escape from the oncogenic GTP-bound state, whereas GTP tightly bound to G12V mutant Ras generates a more persistent, potentially oncogenic, signal. Structural comparisons also suggest that differences between the Switch I (effector) region of G12D and G12V Ras could modify interactions with downstream signalling molecules such as Raf-1, neurofibromin, and phosphatidylinositol 3-hydroxy-kinase. Other differences between the G12D and G12V mutant Ras proteins include a lower affinity of the GTPase activating protein GAP for G12V than for G12D or WT Ras; but, as both G12D and G12V Ras are refractory to GTPase activation by GAP binding, this may be less significant. These studies complement experimental data showing that such Ras mutations differ in their effects in vitro and in vivo and, with recent data indicating heterogeneity of ras mutation in colorectal carcinomas and other tumours, make it plausible that codon 12 Ras mutations differ in carcinogenic potential and prognostic significance. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Br J Cancer
            British Journal of Cancer
            Nature Publishing Group
            0007-0920
            1532-1827
            September 2001
            : 85
            : 5
            : 692-696
            Affiliations
            [1 ]Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Imperial College School of Medicine, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK
            [2 ]Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
            [3 ]University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
            [4 ]Bancroft Centre, Herston, Australia
            [5 ]Queensland University of Technology, Australia
            [6 ]Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
            [7 ]School of Pathology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
            [8 ]Charles University Hospital, Hradex Kralove, Czech Republic
            [9 ]Hospital Avicenne, Bobigny
            [10 ]Groupe Hospitalier Cochin-Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris, France
            [11 ]INSERM, Foundation J. Dausset, Paris, France
            [12 ]Max-Planck-Institut fur Molekulare Physiologie, Dortmund, Germany
            [13 ]Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany
            [14 ]Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
            [15 ]Department of Biology, Morrill Science Centre, University of Massachusetts, USA
            [16 ]Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
            [17 ]Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
            [18 ]Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Eire
            [19 ]St Vincent's Hospital, Dublin, Eire
            [20 ]Instituto Naziolale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova, Italy
            [21 ]Department of Anatomy, surgery & Oncology, Palermo University, Italy
            [22 ]1st Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Japan
            [23 ]2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Fukui Medical School, Japan
            [24 ]1st Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Medical & Dental University, Japan
            [25 ]Department of Pathology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
            [26 ]RCMS Lab, Fondation ‘Recherche Cancer et Sang’, Luxembourg
            [27 ]Department of Surgery, St-Theresia-Clinics, Luxembourg
            [28 ]Department of Surgery, the Hospital Centre of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
            [29 ]Department of Pathology, Masstricht University, The Netherlands
            [30 ]The National Hospital, Oslo, Norway
            [31 ]The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
            [32 ]Molecular Biology Laboratory, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
            [33 ]Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
            [34 ]Department of Oncology, University of Linkoping, Sweden
            [35 ]Department of Cell Biology, University of Linkoping
            [36 ]Institut Universitaire de Pathologie, Lausanne, Switzerland
            [37 ]Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
            [38 ]Department of Public Health, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
            [39 ]Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
            [40 ]Molecular Oncology, University of Leeds, UK
            [41 ]Department of Pathology, University Medical School, Edinburgh, UK
            [42 ]Sir Alastair Currie CRC Laboratories, Edinburgh, UK
            [43 ]Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, UK
            [44 ]Zeneca Diagnostics, Northwich, UK
            [45 ]Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, UK
            [46 ]Department of General Surgery, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
            [47 ]Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London
            [48 ]St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
            [49 ]Yale University School of Medicine, CT, USA
            [50 ]Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, USA
            [51 ]Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre
            [52 ]Ferbuson-Blodget Digestive Disease Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
            [53 ]Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
            [54 ]Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
            [55 ]Institute of Nuclear Sciences ‘Vinca’, Belgrade, Yugoslavia
            [56 ]Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Yugoslavia
            Article
            6691964
            10.1054/bjoc.2001.1964
            2364126
            11531254
            9e1f699a-8dc8-4b38-abd0-34cf3ea39baf
            Copyright 2001, Cancer Research Campaign
            History
            : 24 January 2001
            : 14 May 2001
            : 15 May 2001
            Categories
            Presented by the Kirsten ras in-colorectal-cancer collaborative group

            Oncology & Radiotherapy
            Oncology & Radiotherapy

            Comments

            Comment on this article