2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Placebos Without Deception: Outcomes, Mechanisms, and Ethics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Scientific research indicates that open-label and dose-extending placebos (that patients know are placebos) can elicit behavioral, biological, and clinical outcome changes. In this chapter, we present the state-of-the-art evidence and ethical considerations about open-label and dose-extending placebos, discussing the perspective of giving placebos with a rational, as dose extension of active drugs, or expectancy boosters. Previous comprehensive reviews of placebo use have considered how to harness placebo effects in medicine and the need to focus on elements of the clinical encounter as well as patient–clinician relations. Here, we illustrate the similarities and differences between standard (deceptive) placebos, open-label placebos and dose-extending placebos. We conclude that placebos without deception would override ethical barriers to their clinical use. This paves the way to future large-scale, pragmatic randomized trials that investigate the potential of ethical open-label and dose-extending placebos to improve patients’ outcomes, and reduce side effects.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0374740
          4354
          Int Rev Neurobiol
          Int. Rev. Neurobiol.
          International review of neurobiology
          0074-7742
          2162-5514
          11 April 2018
          04 April 2018
          2018
          26 April 2018
          : 138
          : 219-240
          Affiliations
          [* ]School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
          []School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
          []University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
          [§ ]Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
          Author notes
          [1 ]Corresponding author: colloca@ 123456umaryland.edu
          Article
          PMC5918690 PMC5918690 5918690 nihpa958741
          10.1016/bs.irn.2018.01.005
          5918690
          29681327
          9e3c117f-62e8-4f50-979d-d752d77af298
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Conditioning,Dose-extending placebo,Learning,Verbal suggestions,Expectancy

          Comments

          Comment on this article