10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maxillary sinus augmentation using chairside bone marrow aspirate concentrates for implant site development: a systematic review of histomorphometric studies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Maxillary sinus pneumatization following dental tooth extractions and maxillary alveolar bone resorption frequently leaves inadequate bone levels for implant placement. The objectives of this systematic review are to evaluate the effects of bone marrow aspirate concentrates (BMACs) used in maxillary sinus augmentation for implant site development.

          A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies which histomorphometrically evaluated the efficacy of BMACs and BMAC-enriched biomaterials in sinus floor elevation. Six studies were selected, and the risk of bias was evaluated.

          Reported ranges of vital mineralized tissue for the BMAC groups for the selected studies were 34.63–55.15% compared to 27.30% for control groups. For vital mineralized bone, these studies reported variable statistical significance. At 3–4 months, new bone formation for BMAC groups with controls using no BMAC was 7.4–12.6% and for the control groups was 9.45–14.3%. At 6 months, new bone formation for BMAC groups was 13.5–14.12% and for control groups was 10.41–13.9%. For new bone formation, these studies reported no significant difference between test and control and between 3 and 6 months histologic evaluation.

          Within the limits of this systematic review, the chairside method to harvest BMAC produced similar implant survival and new bone formation compared to the laboratory FICOLL group, without the additional cost and time of laboratory cell isolation techniques. The iliac crest or tibia origins, single or double centrifugation, for BMAC do not appear to be a factor for implant survival or bone formation. Although some favorable outcomes were reported, the increase in new bone formation using chairside-harvested BMAC compared to control is not predictably more significant across studies.

          Clinically, new bone formation in the maxillary sinus is not always contingent on the presence of BMAC. The novelty of this method requires more future studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions.

            H. Tatum (1986)
            The root and sinus series of the Omnii system have been used extensively since 1981. They are very versatile in their ability to be used within edentulous areas of the maxilla. Their design attempts to maximize the use of the available bone, and placement techniques allow the manipulation of bone to form sockets in otherwise deficient areas of bone. The root implants can be used as free-standing implants or as multiple abutments. The sinus implant is always used as an abutment. It may be used in conjunction with other implants or with natural abutments. Maxillary implants are not loaded until a 6-month healing time has elapsed following placement. An understanding of the different qualities of bone found in the maxilla is important to achieving the successful loading of these implants. Different times are required to allow physiologic loading in different qualities of maxillary bone. Restorative treatment is normally done with fixed bridge work, and the use of any type of stress breaker attachments is not recommended.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments

              Background: Systematic-review methodologies provide objectivity and transparency to the process of collecting and synthesizing scientific evidence in reaching conclusions on specific research questions. There is increasing interest in applying these procedures to address environmental health questions. Objectives: The goal was to develop a systematic-review framework to address environmental health questions by extending approaches developed for clinical medicine to handle the breadth of data relevant to environmental health sciences (e.g., human, animal, and mechanistic studies). Methods: The Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) adapted guidance from authorities on systematic-review and sought advice during development of the OHAT Approach through consultation with technical experts in systematic review and human health assessments, as well as scientific advisory groups and the public. The method was refined by considering expert and public comments and through application to case studies. Results and Discussion: Here we present a seven-step framework for systematic review and evidence integration for reaching hazard identification conclusions: 1) problem formulation and protocol development, 2) search for and select studies for inclusion, 3) extract data from studies, 4) assess the quality or risk of bias of individual studies, 5) rate the confidence in the body of evidence, 6) translate the confidence ratings into levels of evidence, and 7) integrate the information from different evidence streams (human, animal, and “other relevant data” including mechanistic or in vitro studies) to develop hazard identification conclusions. Conclusion: The principles of systematic review can be successfully applied to environmental health questions to provide greater objectivity and transparency to the process of developing conclusions. Citation: Rooney AA, Boyles AL, Wolfe MS, Bucher JR, Thayer KA. 2014. Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments. Environ Health Perspect 122:711–718; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307972
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                1-610-5503333 , thinkdentallearninginstitute@gmail.com
                Journal
                Int J Implant Dent
                Int J Implant Dent
                International Journal of Implant Dentistry
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                2198-4034
                3 September 2018
                3 September 2018
                December 2018
                : 4
                : 25
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Private practice in Periodontology, and Think Dental Learning Institute, Paoli, PA 19301 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2248 3398, GRID grid.264727.2, Temple University Kornberg School of Dentistry, ; 3223 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2248 3398, GRID grid.264727.2, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral Medicine, Pathology and Surgery, , Temple University Kornberg School of Dentistry, ; 3223 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2248 3398, GRID grid.264727.2, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, , Temple University (Medicine), ; 3223 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2248 3398, GRID grid.264727.2, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, , Temple University (Dentistry), ; 3223 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8503-2279
                Article
                137
                10.1186/s40729-018-0137-3
                6119678
                30175389
                9e40339b-035a-4647-a045-48ee458afe51
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 20 February 2018
                : 21 May 2018
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                bone marrow aspirate concentrates,histomorphometric,bone grafting

                Comments

                Comment on this article