17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Descriptive analysis of childbirth healthcare costs in an area with high levels of immigration in Spain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The aim of this study was to estimate the cost of childbirth in a teaching hospital in Barcelona, Spain, including the costs of prenatal care, delivery and postnatal care (3 months). Costs were assessed by taking into account maternal origin and delivery type.

          Methods

          We performed a cross-sectional study of all deliveries in a teaching hospital to mothers living in its catchment area between October 2006 and September 2007. A process cost analysis based on a full cost accounting system was performed. The main information sources were the primary care program for sexual and reproductive health, and hospital care and costs records. Partial and total costs were compared according to maternal origin and delivery type. A regression model was fit to explain the total cost of the childbirth process as a function of maternal age and origin, prenatal care, delivery type, maternal and neonatal severity, and multiple delivery.

          Results

          The average cost of childbirth was 4,328€, with an average of 18.28 contacts between the mother or the newborn and the healthcare facilities. The delivery itself accounted for more than 75% of the overall cost: maternal admission accounted for 57% and neonatal admission for 20%. Prenatal care represented 18% of the overall cost and 75% of overall acts. The average overall cost was 5,815€ for cesarean sections, 4,064€ for vaginal instrumented deliveries and 3,682€ for vaginal non-instrumented deliveries (p < 0.001). The regression model explained 45.5% of the cost variability. The incremental cost of a delivery through cesarean section was 955€ (an increase of 31.9%) compared with an increase of 193€ (6.4%) for an instrumented vaginal delivery. The incremental cost of admitting the newborn to hospital ranged from 420€ (14.0%) to 1,951€ (65.2%) depending on the newborn's severity. Age, origin and prenatal care were not statistically significant or economically relevant.

          Conclusions

          Neither immigration nor prenatal care were associated with a substantial difference in costs. The most important predictors of cost were delivery type and neonatal severity. Given the impact of cesarean sections on the overall cost of childbirth, attempts should be made to take into account its higher cost in the decision of performing a cesarean section.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births.

          To compare the outcomes and costs associated with primary cesarean births with no labor (planned cesareans) to vaginal and cesarean births with labor (planned vaginal). Analysis was based on a Massachusetts data system linking 470,857 birth certificates, fetal death records, and birth-related hospital discharge records from 1998 and 2003. We examined a subset of 244,088 mothers with no prior cesarean and no documented prenatal risk. We then divided mothers into two groups: those with no labor and a primary cesarean (planned primary cesarean deliveries-3,334 women) and those with labor and either a vaginal birth or a cesarean delivery (planned vaginal-240,754 women). We compared maternal rehospitalization rates and analyzed costs and length of stay. Rehospitalizations in the first 30 days after giving birth were more likely in planned cesarean (19.2 in 1,000) when compared with planned vaginal births (7.5 in 1,000). After controlling for age, parity, and race or ethnicity, mothers with a planned primary cesarean were 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-2.9) times more likely to require a rehospitalization in the first 30 days postpartum. The leading causes of rehospitalization after a planned cesarean were wound complications (6.6 in 1,000) (P<.001) and infection (3.3 in 1,000). The average initial hospital cost of a planned primary cesarean of US dollars 4,372 (95% C.I. US dollars 4,293-4,451) was 76% higher than the average for planned vaginal births of US dollars 2,487 (95% C.I. US dollars 2,481-2,493), and length of stay was 77% longer (4.3 days to 2.4 days). Clinicians should be aware of the increased risk for maternal rehospitalization after cesarean deliveries to low-risk mothers when counseling women about their choices. II.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Maternal-fetal conditions necessitating a medical intervention resulting in preterm birth.

            The objective of the study was to evaluate the extent to which maternal and fetal conditions necessitate medically indicated preterm birth. A population-based, retrospective, cohort study of women who delivered a singleton live birth at 20 weeks or longer in Missouri, 1989 to 1997 was performed (n = 684,711). Maternal-fetal conditions that necessitated iatrogenic preterm birth included preeclampsia, small-for-gestational-age birth, fetal distress, placental abruption, placenta previa, unexplained vaginal bleeding, pregestational and gestational diabetes, renal disease, Rh sensitization, and congenital malformations. We examined the association between each of the aforementioned conditions and risk of medically indicated preterm birth at less than 35 weeks. Medically indicated preterm birth was defined as a labor induction or a prelabor cesarean in the absence of premature rupture of membranes at preterm gestations. Adjusted relative risk with 95% confidence interval for preterm birth was derived from multivariable logistic regression models, and population attributable fractions were calculated. The preterm birth rate (less than 35 weeks) was 4.6% (n = 31,238), with 23.5% (n = 7,347) of such births being medically indicated. Preeclampsia, fetal distress, small-for-gestational-age, and placental abruption were the most common indications for a medical intervention resulting in preterm birth, with at least 1 of these conditions present in 53.2% of medically indicated preterm births and in 17.7% of term births (relative risk 4.9, 95% confidence interval 4.7, 5.2). Preeclampsia, fetal distress, small-for-gestational-age, and placental abruption, conditions that are associated with ischemic placental disease, are implicated in well over half of all medically indicated preterm births. Although the etiology of preterm birth is heterogeneous, it is reasonable that ischemic placental disease may serve as an important pathway to preterm birth.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trends in preterm birth and perinatal mortality among singletons: United States, 1989 through 2000.

              Despite the recent increase in preterm birth in the United States, trends in preterm birth subtypes have not been adequately examined. We examined trends in preterm birth among singletons following ruptured membranes, medical indications, and spontaneous preterm birth and evaluated the impact of these trends on perinatal mortality. A population-based, retrospective cohort study comprising 46,375,578 women (16% blacks) who delivered singleton births in the United States, 1989 through 2000, was performed. Rates of preterm birth ( /= 22 weeks plus neonatal deaths within 28 days), before and after adjustment for potential confounders, were derived from ecological logistic regression models. Preterm birth rates increased by 14% (95% confidence interval 13-15%) among whites from 8.3% to 9.4% and decreased by 15% (95% confidence interval 14-16%) among blacks from 18.5% to 16.2% between 1989 and 2000. Among whites, preterm birth following ruptured membranes declined by 23%, medically indicated preterm birth increased by 55%, and spontaneous preterm birth increased by 3%. Among blacks, preterm birth following ruptured membranes declined by 37%, medically indicated preterm birth increased by 32%, and spontaneous preterm birth decreased by 27%. The largest decline in perinatal mortality among whites was associated with increases in medically indicated preterm birth, whereas the largest decline in perinatal mortality among blacks was associated with declines in preterm birth following ruptured membranes and spontaneous preterm birth. Temporal trends in preterm birth varied substantially based on underlying subtype and maternal race. The recent increase in medically indicated preterm birth was associated with a favorable reduction in perinatal mortality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central
                1472-6963
                2011
                15 April 2011
                : 11
                : 77
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
                [2 ]CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
                [3 ]Preventive Medicine and Public Health Educational Unit, Hospital del Mar-Universitat Pompeu Fabra-Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona (H.MAR-UPF-ASPB), Barcelona, Spain
                [4 ]Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona, Spain
                [5 ]Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
                [6 ]Obstretics and Gynecology Department, IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
                Article
                1472-6963-11-77
                10.1186/1472-6963-11-77
                3100245
                21492486
                9e66977e-e2cc-49b8-a58a-6d0a08379e17
                Copyright ©2011 Comas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 July 2010
                : 15 April 2011
                Categories
                Research Article

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article