4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole oral suspension in paediatric patients younger than 13 years of age: a retrospective analysis and literature review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d89381e188">What is Known and Objective</h5> <p id="P1">Posaconazole is an extended-spectrum triazole antifungal with activity against a variety of clinically significant yeasts and molds. Posaconazole is not currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in children younger than 13 years of age. Our primary objective was to describe the dosing and observed trough concentrations with posaconazole oral suspension in pediatric patients at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (Bethesda, MD). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d89381e193">Methods</h5> <p id="P2">This retrospective single-center study reviewed pediatric patients younger than 13 years of age initiated on posaconazole oral suspension. Patients were included if they were initiated on posaconazole for prophylaxis or treatment of fungal infections from September 2006 through March 2013 with at least one trough concentration collected after at least 7 days of therapy. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d89381e198">Results and Discussion</h5> <p id="P3">A total of 20 male patients were included, of whom 15 (75%) had chronic granulomatous disease. The median age of patients was 6.5 years (range: 2.8 – 10.7). A total of 79 posaconazole trough concentrations were measured in patients receiving posaconazole as prophylaxis (n=8) or treatment (n=12). Posaconazole dose referenced to total body weight ranged from 10.0 – 49.2 mg/kg/day. Posaconazole trough concentrations ranged from undetectable (&lt;50 ng/mL) up to 3620 ng/mL and were ≥500, ≥700, and ≥1250 ng/mL in 95, 60, and 25% of patients, respectively. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d89381e203">What is New and Conclusions</h5> <p id="P4">Patients younger than 13 years of age had highly variable trough concentrations and recommendations for the appropriate dosing of posaconazole oral suspension remain challenging. Until studies are conducted to determine the appropriate dosing of posaconazole in this patient population, therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered to ensure adequate posaconazole exposure. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: guidelines from the British Society for Medical Mycology.

          The burden of human disease related to medically important fungal pathogens is substantial. An improved understanding of antifungal pharmacology and antifungal pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics has resulted in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) becoming a valuable adjunct to the routine administration of some antifungal agents. TDM may increase the probability of a successful outcome, prevent drug-related toxicity and potentially prevent the emergence of antifungal drug resistance. Much of the evidence that supports TDM is circumstantial. This document reviews the available literature and provides a series of recommendations for TDM of antifungal agents.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment of invasive aspergillosis with posaconazole in patients who are refractory to or intolerant of conventional therapy: an externally controlled trial.

            Invasive aspergillosis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Current treatments provide limited benefit. Posaconazole is an extended-spectrum triazole with in vitro and in vivo activity against Aspergillus species. We investigated the efficacy and safety of posaconazole oral suspension (800 mg/day in divided doses) as monotherapy in an open-label, multicenter study in patients with invasive aspergillosis and other mycoses who were refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. Data from external control cases were collected retrospectively to provide a comparative reference group. Cases of aspergillosis deemed evaluable by a blinded data review committee included 107 posaconazole recipients and 86 control subjects (modified intent-to-treat population). The populations were similar and balanced with regard to prespecified demographic and disease variables. The overall success rate (i.e., the data review committee-assessed global response at the end of treatment) was 42% for posaconazole recipients and 26% for control subjects (odds ratio, 4.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-11.04; P=.006). The differences in response between the modified intent-to-treat treatment groups were preserved across additional, prespecified subsets, including infection site (pulmonary or disseminated), hematological malignancy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, baseline neutropenia, and reason for enrollment (patient was refractory to or intolerant of previous antifungal therapy). An exposure-response relationship was suggested by pharmacokinetic analyses. Although the study predates extensive use of echinocandins and voriconazole, these findings demonstrate that posaconazole is an alternative to salvage therapy for patients with invasive aspergillosis who are refractory to or intolerant of previous antifungal therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              In vitro activities of posaconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against a large collection of clinically important molds and yeasts.

              The in vitro activity of the novel triazole antifungal agent posaconazole (Noxafil; SCH 56592) was assessed in 45 laboratories against approximately 19,000 clinically important strains of yeasts and molds. The activity of posaconazole was compared with those of itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against subsets of the isolates. Strains were tested utilizing Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods using RPMI 1640 medium (except for amphotericin B, which was frequently tested in antibiotic medium 3). MICs were determined at the recommended endpoints and time intervals. Against all fungi in the database (22,850 MICs), the MIC(50) and MIC(90) values for posaconazole were 0.063 microg/ml and 1 mug/ml, respectively. MIC(90) values against all yeasts (18,351 MICs) and molds (4,499 MICs) were both 1 mug/ml. In comparative studies against subsets of the isolates, posaconazole was more active than, or within 1 dilution of, the comparator drugs itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against approximately 7,000 isolates of Candida and Cryptococcus spp. Against all molds (1,702 MICs, including 1,423 MICs for Aspergillus isolates), posaconazole was more active than or equal to the comparator drugs in almost every category. Posaconazole was active against isolates of Candida and Aspergillus spp. that exhibit resistance to fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B and was much more active than the other triazoles against zygomycetes. Posaconazole exhibited potent antifungal activity against a wide variety of clinically important fungal pathogens and was frequently more active than other azoles and amphotericin B.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
                J Clin Pharm Ther
                Wiley
                02694727
                February 2017
                February 2017
                December 16 2016
                : 42
                : 1
                : 75-79
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring MD USA
                [2 ]Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Philadelphia PA USA
                [3 ]Biostatistics Research Branch; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institutes of Health; Bethesda MD USA
                [4 ]Clinical Center Pharmacy Department; National Institutes of Health; Bethesda MD USA
                [5 ]Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institutes of Health; Bethesda MD USA
                [6 ]Department of Pharmacotherapy; University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy; Fort Worth TX USA
                Article
                10.1111/jcpt.12483
                5209268
                27982447
                9e6ed992-f643-4396-9d53-39cd613f4bb0
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article