10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Research ethics and refugee health: a review of reported considerations and applications in published refugee health literature, 2015-2018

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Public health investigations, including research, in refugee populations are necessary to inform evidence-based interventions and care. The unique challenges refugees face (displacement, limited political protections, economic hardship) can make them especially vulnerable to harm, burden, or undue influence. Acute survival needs, fear of stigma or persecution, and history of trauma may present challenges to ensuring meaningful informed consent and establishing trust. We examined the recently published literature to understand the application of ethics principles in investigations involving refugees.

          Methods

          We conducted a preliminary review of refugee health literature (research and non-research data collections) published from 2015 through 2018 available in PubMed. Article inclusion criteria were: participants were refugees, topic was health-related, and methods used primary data collection. Information regarding type of investigation, methods, and reported ethics considerations was abstracted.

          Results

          We examined 288 articles. Results indicated 33% of investigations were conducted before resettlement, during the displacement period (68% of these were in refugee camps). Common topics included mental health (48%) and healthcare access (8%). The majority (87%) of investigations obtained consent. Incentives were provided less frequently (23%). Most authors discussed the ways in which community stakeholders were engaged (91%), yet few noted whether refugee representatives had an opportunity to review investigational protocols (8%). Cultural considerations were generally limited to gender and religious norms, and 13% mentioned providing some form of post-investigation support.

          Conclusions

          Our analysis is a preliminary assessment of the application of ethics principles reported within the recently published refugee health literature. From this analysis, we have proposed a list of best practices, which include stakeholder engagement, respect for cultural norms, and post-study support. Investigations conducted among refugees require additional diligence to ensure respect for and welfare of the participants. Development of a refugee-specific ethics framework with ethics and refugee health experts that addresses the need for stakeholder involvement, appropriate incentive use, protocol review, and considerations of cultural practices may help guide future investigations in this population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An ethics framework for public health.

          Nancy Kass (2001)
          More than 100 years ago, public health began as an organized discipline, its purpose being to improve the health of populations rather than of individuals. Given its population-based focus, however, public health perennially faces dilemmas concerning the appropriate extent of its reach and whether its activities infringe on individual liberties in ethically troublesome ways. In this article a framework for ethics analysis of public health programs is proposed. To advance traditional public health goals while maximizing individual liberties and furthering social justice, public health interventions should reduce morbidity or mortality; data must substantiate that a program (or the series of programs of which a program is a part) will reduce morbidity or mortality; burdens of the program must be identified and minimized; the program must be implemented fairly and must, at times, minimize preexisting social injustices; and fair procedures must be used to determine which burdens are acceptable to a community.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The dual imperative in refugee research: some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration.

            Social scientists doing fieldwork in humanitarian situations often face a dual imperative: research should be both academically sound and policy relevant. We argue that much of the current research on forced migration is based on unsound methodology, and that the data and subsequent policy conclusions are often flawed or ethically suspect. This paper identifies some key methodological and ethical problems confronting social scientists studying forced migrants or their hosts. These problems include non-representativeness and bias, issues arising from working in unfamiliar contexts including translation and the use of local researchers, and ethical dilemmas including security and confidentiality issues and whether researchers are doing enough to 'do no harm'. The second part of the paper reviews the authors' own efforts to conduct research on urban refugees in Johannesburg. It concludes that while there is no single 'best practice' for refugee research, refugee studies would advance its academic and policy relevance by more seriously considering methodological and ethical concerns.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Beyond informed consent

              Although a relatively recent phenomenon, the role of informed consent in human research is central to its ethical regulation and conduct. However, guidelines often recommend procedures for obtaining informed consent (usually written consent) that are difficult to implement in developing countries. This paper reviews the guidelines for obtaining informed consent and also discusses prevailing views on current controversies, ambiguities and problems with these guidelines and suggests potential solutions. The emphasis in most externally sponsored research projects in developing countries is on laborious documentation of several mechanical aspects of the research process rather than on assuring true comprehension and voluntary participation. The onus for the oversight of this process is often left to overworked and ill-equipped local ethics review committees. Current guidelines and processes for obtaining informed consent should be reviewed with the specific aim of developing culturally appropriate methods of sharing information about the research project and obtaining and documenting consent that is truly informed. Further research is needed to examine the validity and user friendliness of innovations in information sharing procedures for obtaining consent in different cultural settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lmx6@cdc.gov
                nhd9@cdc.gov
                lhy2@cdc.gov
                opz4@xcdc.gov
                dhb1@cdc.gov
                hsq3@cdc.gov
                hei1@cdc.gov
                nbm8@cdc.gov
                Journal
                Confl Health
                Confl Health
                Conflict and Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1752-1505
                20 June 2020
                20 June 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 39
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.416738.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2163 0069, Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ; 1600 Clifton Road, MS EO3, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.416738.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2163 0069, CDC/CSTE Applied Epidemiology Fellowship Program, ; Atlanta, Georgia USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.410547.3, ISNI 0000 0001 1013 9784, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, ; Oak Ridge, Tennessee USA
                [4 ]Eagle Global Scientific, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.416738.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2163 0069, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of Science, , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4426-5425
                Article
                283
                10.1186/s13031-020-00283-z
                7305588
                32577125
                9e98bbad-89fe-498d-87ce-737856ad00bd
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 6 December 2019
                : 2 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000030, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
                Award ID: 1U38OT000143-05
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Health & Social care
                ethics,research,framework,refugee,health
                Health & Social care
                ethics, research, framework, refugee, health

                Comments

                Comment on this article