Predictive Roles of the Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test (RSST) in Aspiration Pneumonia and Other Respiratory Diseases: Does the RSST Have a Predictive Role in Aspiration Pneumonia and Other Respiratory Diseases?

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Patients with dysphagia do not always present with subjective symptoms. However, asymptomatic dysphagia can also cause clinical issues, especially in those with respiratory conditions. Therefore, adequate screening is an essential beginning to their care. The repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST) is one of the safest screening methods for dysphagia; it can be easily performed by nonprofessionals in any setting. There is evidence of its predictive values in aspiration pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), artificial ventilation, and other conditions. Additionaly, it has recently been found to be a strong predictor of the risk of future COPD exacerbation. The cost-effectiveness, harmlessness, and simplicity make it an optimal screening method for the large population of patients with respiratory conditions, although different cutoff values may be useful in different populations. It also takes into account multiple aspects of the swallowing ability, such as respiration, musculature, cognition, and general well-being.

Related collections

Most cited references 23

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Three tests for predicting aspiration without videofluorography.

K V Kuhlemeier, Matthew B Palmer, Haruka Tohara … (2002)

The videofluorographic swallowing study (VFSS) is the definitive test to identify aspiration and other abnormalities of swallowing. When a VFSS is not feasible, nonvideofluorographic (non-VFG) clinical assessment of swallowing is essential. We studied the accuracy of three non-VFG tests for assessing risk of aspiration: (1) the water swallowing test (3 ml of water are placed under the tongue and the patient is asked to swallow); (2) the food test (4 g of pudding are placed on the dorsum of the tongue and the patient asked to swallow); and (3) the X-ray test (static radiographs of the pharynx are taken before and after swallowing liquid barium). Sixty-three individuals with dysphagia were each evaluated with the three non-VFG tests and a VFSS; 29 patients aspirated on the VFSS. The summed scores of all three non-VFG tests had a sensitivity of 90% for predicting aspiration and specificity of 71% for predicting its absence. The summed scores of the water and food tests (without X-ray) had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 56%. These non-VFG tests have limitations but may be useful for assessing patients when VFSS is not feasible. They may also be useful as screening procedures to determine which dysphagia patients need a VFSS.

0 comments Cited 62 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Development and validation of a self-report symptom inventory to assess the severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia.

Karen L. Wallace, Sue Middleton, Ian J Cook (2000)

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of a self-report inventory to measure symptomatic severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia. Test-retest reliability and face, content, and construct validity of a prototype visual analogue scale inventory were assessed in 45 patients who had stable, neuromyogenic dysphagia. Normalized scores varied over time by -0.5% +/- 17.6% (95% confidence interval, -9.2% to 8.2%). Factor analysis identified a single factor (dysphagia), to which 18 of 19 questions contributed significantly, that accounted for 56% of total variance (P < 0.0001). After deletion of 2 questions with poor face validity and patient compliance, this proportion increased to 59%; mean test-retest change was -2% (95% confidence interval, -11% to 7%); and total score correlated highly with an independent global assessment severity score (r = 0.7; P < 0.0001). A mean 70% reduction in score (P < 0.0001) was observed after surgery in patients with Zenker's diverticulum (discriminant validity). Applied to patients with neuromyogenic dysphagia, the 17-question inventory shows strong test-retest reliability over 2 weeks as well as face, content, and construct validity. Discriminant validity (responsiveness) has been demonstrated in a population with a correctable, structural cricopharyngeal disorder. Responsiveness of the instrument to treatment in neuromyogenic dysphagia remains to be quantified.

0 comments Cited 47 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Water-Swallowing Test: Screening for Aspiration in Stroke Patients

Aiko Osawa, Shinichiro Maeshima, Norio Tanahashi (2013)

Background and Purpose: The water-swallowing test (WST) is frequently used in clinical practice as a functional assessment to detect aspiration and prevent pneumonia. It is a standardized test used all over the world, but the amount of water given varies depending on the examiner. Furthermore, there are very few reports on the simultaneous performance of the WST and videofluorography (VF). This study compared the amount of swallowed water to investigate the reliability of WST to exclude aspiration following acute stroke. Methods: We assessed 111 stroke patients (65 men and 46 women) with suspected dysphagia/difficulty in swallowing and performed VF upon obtaining consent from the patients and their families. Patients were aged between 20 and 98 years (65.6 ± 13.4 years); 64 had cerebral infarction, 26 cerebral hemorrhage, 13 subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 8 had other cerebrovascular disease. The time from stroke onset to VF was 16.6 ± 10.3 days (range, 2-55). WSTs using 5, 10, 30, and 60 ml and the modified WST (MWST) were performed during VF. Results: We found that the number of instances of choking, cough, wet voice, and aspiration increased with higher amounts of water. The sensitivity and specificity of WST for aspiration ranged from 34.8 to 55.7% and from 78.9 to 93.2%, respectively. The MWST, which used only 3 ml of water, yielded a sensitivity of 55.3% and a specificity of 80.8% for aspiration. There was a positive correlation between the time for one swallow and age, but there was no difference between genders. There was also no connection between clinical findings during WST or the presence of aspiration with the number of swallows, swallowing speed, or time for one swallow. Conclusions: WSTs are not as powerful as VF as a screening instrument in acute stroke. WSTs with more water detected aspiration with greater sensitivity, but there is no justification for overconfidence when investigating aspiration. We recommend using WST as well as VF to investigate swallowing in stroke patients.

0 comments Cited 37 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Contributors

Shinji Teramoto: shinjit-tky@umin.ac.jp

Kosaku Komiya: komiyakh1@oita-u.ac.jp

Yuki Yoshimatsu: yukitsukihana0105@gmail.com

Journal

Journal ID (publisher-id): 978-981-15-4506-1

Journal ID (doi): 10.1007/978-981-15-4506-1

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Aspiration Pneumonia

Title: Aspiration Pneumonia

Subtitle: The Current Clinical Giant for Respiratory Physicians

ISBN (Print): 978-981-15-4505-4

ISBN (Electronic): 978-981-15-4506-1

Publication date (Electronic): 1 April 2020

Publication date Collection: 2020

Pages: 131-141

Affiliations

[3 ]GRID grid.411909.4, Department of Respiratory Medicine, , Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, ; Tokyo, Japan

[4 ]GRID grid.412334.3, ISNI 0000 0001 0665 3553, Respiratory Medicine & Infectious Diseases, , Oita University Faculty of Medicine, ; Yufu, Oita Japan

GRID grid.413984.3, Department of respiratory medicine, , Iizuka Hospital, ; Fukuoka, Japan

Article

Publisher ID: 13

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-4506-1_13

PMC ID: 7298539

SO-VID: 9e9bf039-d473-4675-a2bc-8473245e5911

License:

This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.