32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      At slaughtering and post mortem characteristics on Traditional market ewes and Halal market ewes in Tuscany

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The aim of this work was the comparison between the carcass and the meat ewes of the regional Traditional market and the Islamic religious (Halal) market.

          Methods

          Thirty and 20 at the end of career traditional market and Halal market ewes were slaughtered following the EC (European Council, 2009) animal welfare guidelines. Live weight of ewes was taken and dressing percentage of carcasses was calculated. On every carcass zoometric measurement and the evaluation trough the EU grid rules were performed. On the Musculus longissimus thoracis of 12 Traditional market carcasses and 11 Halal market carcasses the physical-chemical and nutritional analysis were performed. Consumer tests for liking meat ewe were performed in order to find consumer’s preference level for Traditional and Halal markets ewe meat. Considering as fixed factor the ewe meat market (Traditional and Halal), results were submitted to oneway Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and to Principal Component Analysis (PCA).

          Results

          The Halal market ewes have shown lower dressing percentages (42.91 ± 0.82 vs 46.42 ± 0.69) and lower conformation score (4.5 ± 0.5 vs 7.8 ± 0.4). The Halal market meat showed higher cooking loss in oven (37.83 ± 1.20 vs 32.03 ± 1.15 %), lesser Chroma value (18.63 ± 0.70 vs 21.84 ± 0.67), and lesser Hue angle value (0.26 ± 0.02 vs 0.34 ± 0.02). This product had also lower fat percentage (4.2 ± 0.4 vs 7.09 ± 0.4). The traditional market meat had higher percentage in monounsatured fatty acids (MUFA) (43.84 ± 1.05 vs 38.22 ± 1.10), while the Halal market meat had higher percentage in ω3 poliunsatured fatty acids (PUFA) (5.04 ± 0.42 vs 3.60 ± 0.40). The consumer test showed as the ewe meat was appreciate by the consumers.

          Conclusions

          Both meat typologies have shown good nutritional characteristics. The traditional market meat had higher MUFA composition, and a better MUFA/satured fatty acids (SFA) ratio, while the Halal market meat had higher PUFA composition. These results were also supported by the PCA. The consumers preferred the traditional market meat.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Eine einfache Methode zur Bestimmung der Wasserbindung in Fleisch

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The texture of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) muscle as measured instrumentally using TPA and Warner-Brazler shear test

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                + 39 0552755586 , clara.sargentini@unifi.it
                Journal
                J Anim Sci Technol
                J Anim Sci Technol
                Journal of Animal Science and Technology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2055-0391
                7 September 2016
                7 September 2016
                2016
                : 58
                : 1
                : 35
                Affiliations
                Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell’Ambiente (DISPAA) – sez. Scienze Animali, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via delle Cascine, 5, 50144 Firenze, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0729-5596
                Article
                116
                10.1186/s40781-016-0116-2
                5013581
                9ee07635-88c6-4d0a-819c-45c988809d79
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 May 2016
                : 3 August 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: Regione Toscana: Misura 124: Cooperazione per lo sviluppo di nuovi prodotti, processi e tecnologie nei settori agricolo e alimentare e in quello forestale. Progetto Valorizzazione delle carni e dei sotto-prodotti della macellazione ovina tramite la realizzazione di prodotti innovativi e per nuovi mercati (VACASOPINUM)
                Award ID: B15E13000170002
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                ewe,traditional market,halal market,carcass characteristics,meat quality,pca analysis,consumer test

                Comments

                Comment on this article