3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          T-tube drainage, primary closure, and biliary stenting are the common bile duct closure methods. There is great debate on the optimal duct closure technique after common bile duct exploration. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the three commonest common bile duct closure methods after common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stone for future generalization.

          Methods

          In this analysis, 211 patients with common bile duct stone underwent common bile duct exploration from January 2016 to December 2020. The patients were divided according to common bile duct closure techniques into three groups, including the T-tube drainage group (63 patients), primary duct closure group (61 patients), and antegrade biliary stenting group (87 patients).

          Results

          The incidence of overall biliary complications and bile leak were statistically significantly lower in the biliary stenting group than in the other two groups. Also, hospital stays, drain carried time, return to normal activity, re-intervention, and re-admission rates were statistically significantly lower in the biliary stenting group than in the other two groups. There were no statistically significant differences regarding operative and choledochotomy time, retained and recurrent stone, stricture, biliary peritonitis, cholangitis, and the cost among the three groups.

          Conclusions

          We state that the biliary stenting procedure should be the preferred first option for common bile duct closure after common bile duct exploration when compared with T-tube drainage and primary duct closure.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (Approval No. NCT04264299).

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

          Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. This shortcoming hampers comparison of outcome data among different centers and therapies and over time. A classification of complications published by one of the authors in 1992 was critically re-evaluated and modified to increase its accuracy and its acceptability in the surgical community. Modifications mainly focused on the manner of reporting life-threatening and permanently disabling complications. The new grading system still mostly relies on the therapy used to treat the complication. The classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients who underwent elective general surgery at our institution. The reproducibility and personal judgment of the classification were evaluated through an international survey with 2 questionnaires sent to 10 surgical centers worldwide. The new ranking system significantly correlated with complexity of surgery (P < 0.0001) as well as with the length of the hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A total of 144 surgeons from 10 different centers around the world and at different levels of training returned the survey. Ninety percent of the case presentations were correctly graded. The classification was considered to be simple (92% of the respondents), reproducible (91%), logical (92%), useful (90%), and comprehensive (89%). The answers of both questionnaires were not dependent on the origin of the reply and the level of training of the surgeons. The new complication classification appears reliable and may represent a compelling tool for quality assessment in surgery in all parts of the world.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Complications of ERCP.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mohamed_ali@med.svu.edu.eg
                profalaaredwan@yahoo.com
                marwa.nasrelden@med.svu.edu.eg
                Journal
                Langenbecks Arch Surg
                Langenbecks Arch Surg
                Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1435-2443
                1435-2451
                4 July 2022
                4 July 2022
                2022
                : 407
                : 5
                : 1805-1815
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.412707.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0621 7833, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, , South Valley University, ; Qena, Egypt
                [2 ]GRID grid.412659.d, ISNI 0000 0004 0621 726X, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, , Sohag University, ; Sohag, Egypt
                [3 ]GRID grid.412707.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0621 7833, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, , Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, ; Qena, Egypt
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-8097
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-0376
                Article
                2597
                10.1007/s00423-022-02597-3
                9399200
                35786738
                9ef01167-3637-4b98-baa2-28dc1b66775a
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 13 October 2021
                : 20 June 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: South Valley University
                Categories
                Controlled Clinical Trials
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022

                Surgery
                choledocholithiasis,t-tube,primary repair,biliary stenting
                Surgery
                choledocholithiasis, t-tube, primary repair, biliary stenting

                Comments

                Comment on this article