29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Online Peer Assessment no ensino superior: uma revisão sistemática da literatura em práticas educacionais Translated title: Online peer assessment in higher education: a systematic review of literature in educational practices

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumo: Neste artigo procedemos a uma revisão sistemática da literatura sobre Online Peer Assessment (OPA) no Ensino Superior, mediada por Tecnologias Digitais de Informação e Comunicação (TIC). Identificamos suas características centrais e opcionais e mapeamos exemplos práticos (procedimentos e TIC) de OPA que poderão ser transversais, adaptáveis e aplicáveis em diversas unidades curriculares e regimes educacionais. Os resultados apontam para a utilização da OPA como uma estratégia que potencializa a “avaliação para a aprendizagem”. Os referenciais teóricos subjacentes, os métodos de avaliação e os tipos de TIC utilizados indicam seu direcionamento para um maior envolvimento e responsabilidade do aluno na sua aprendizagem. Evidenciamos na literatura que se busca desenvolver essas competências, dando ao aluno oportunidades com alguma regularidade, para autoavaliar-se e avaliar seus pares por meio de feedback construtivo. Há também evidências de que dar ou produzir feedback é mais benéfico para a aprendizagem do que apenas recebê-lo, como também é cognitivamente mais exigente e envolve os alunos de forma mais ativa e os direciona ao pensamento crítico e a processos metacognitivos. A partir dos resultados alcançados, consideramos que a OPA, enquanto ferramenta cognitiva, contribui para a construção do conhecimento e para a reflexão sobre a aprendizagem. Um desafio que se coloca diz respeito ao desenvolvimento criativo com foco na diversificação e na inovação das práticas de avaliação no sentido de potenciar aprendizagens e resultados acadêmicos, em atenção às necessidades de aprendizagem que se manifestam frente as expectativas da educação atual e futura e às exigências da sociedade.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract: In this research a systematic review of literature about Online Peer Assessment (OPA) in higher education, mediated by Information and Communication Technology (ICT), was carried out. Optional and central characteristics and its practices (procedures and ICT) were identified and mapping. These procedures and practices may be transversal, adaptable and applied in several curriculum units and educational regimes. The results point to the use of OPA as a strategy that enhances “assessment for learning”. The theoretical framework, the methods of assessment and the kinds of ICT used indicate directions for greater involvement and responsibility from the part of the student in his/her learning. Theoretical framework identifies the need to develop students’ skills, providing them with opportunities for self-assessment and peer assessment on a regular basis through constructive feedback. There is also evidence that to give or receive feedback is more beneficial for learning than just receiving it. It is also cognitively more demanding and directs the students to critical thinking and metacognitive processes. From the results obtained, OPA is seen as a cognitive tool, contributing to the building of knowledge and to reflection about learning. Issues for further reflection are also identified such as the creative development of assessment methods with a focus on diversity and innovation in order to enhance students’ learning and academic results, taking into account their learning needs in face of the expectations of current and future education and the demands of society.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice.

          Hebb's rule (1949) states that learning and memory are based on modifications of synaptic strength among neurons that are simultaneously active. This implies that enhanced synaptic coincidence detection would lead to better learning and memory. If the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor, a synaptic coincidence detector, acts as a graded switch for memory formation, enhanced signal detection by NMDA receptors should enhance learning and memory. Here we show that overexpression of NMDA receptor 2B (NR2B) in the forebrains of transgenic mice leads to enhanced activation of NMDA receptors, facilitating synaptic potentiation in response to stimulation at 10-100 Hz. These mice exhibit superior ability in learning and memory in various behavioural tasks, showing that NR2B is critical in gating the age-dependent threshold for plasticity and memory formation. NMDA-receptor-dependent modifications of synaptic efficacy, therefore, represent a unifying mechanism for associative learning and memory. Our results suggest that genetic enhancement of mental and cognitive attributes such as intelligence and memory in mammals is feasible.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society

            David Boud (2000)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities

              K Topping (1998)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                aval
                Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)
                Avaliação (Campinas)
                Publicação da Rede de Avaliação Institucional da Educação Superior (RAIES), da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) e da Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO). (Sorocaba, SP, Brazil )
                1414-4077
                1982-5765
                June 2017
                : 22
                : 1
                : 55-83
                Affiliations
                [2] orgnameUniversidade do Minho Portugal ccoutinho@ 123456ie.uminho.pt
                [3] orgnameUniversidade do Minho Portugal aflores@ 123456ie.uminho.pt
                [1] Curitiba Paraná orgnameUniversidade Federal do Paraná Brazil selmasantos@ 123456ufpr.br
                Article
                S1414-40772017000100055
                10.1590/s1414-40772017000100004
                9ef1c7f5-441a-4cd5-9ce9-f8df8483fc31

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 21 May 2015
                : 15 May 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 55, Pages: 29
                Product

                SciELO Brazil


                Avaliação no ensino superior,Online peer assessment,Avaliação digital,Assessment in higher education,Digital assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article