Blog
About

2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Improved Recovery following Posttransplant Acute Renal Failure in Rat Renal Isografts with an Oral Endothelin-A Receptor Antagonist

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Delayed renal function after transplantation is a strong predictor of long-term graft survival. As an increased expression of endothelin (ET) has been demonstrated during ischemia/reperfusion injury, we hypothesized that ET-A receptor blockade could improve the recovery of acute renal failure in a rat model of isogeneic kidney transplantation. Methods: Kidneys of Fisher (F344, RT1<sup>1v1</sup>) rat donors flushed with cooled University of Wisconsin solution were transplanted into bilaterally nephrectomized Fisher rats. Recipient animals were treated orally either with vehicle or the selective ET-A receptor antagonist LU135252 (30 mg/kg/day p.o.) for 14 days. Unilaterally nephrectomized Fisher rats not subjected to ischemia served as controls. No immunosuppression was given. On days 2, 6 and 14, metabolic studies were performed to evaluate endogenous creatinine clearance, fractional sodium excretion, and urinary endothelin excretion. Kidneys were harvested at the end of the experiment for determination of renal ET content and immunohistochemical assessment. Results: Urinary ET excretion was increased in vehicle-treated isografts compared to uninephrectomized controls after 14 days. Treatment with LU135252 resulted in a significant improvement in creatinine clearance and fractional sodium excretion to the level of uninephrectomized rats after 14 days. Isografts treated with selective ET-A receptor blockade demonstrated a marked reduction in cell surface markers for macrophages/monocytes, T cells, MHC-II, and ICAM-1. Conclusion: Treatment with the selective ET-A receptor antagonist LU135252 accelerates recovery of renal function after isogeneic renal transplantation and attenuates cellular graft infiltration. This effect could have major implications for the treatment of patients undergoing renal transplantation, as an improved initial renal function may delay the onset of chronic allograft rejection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          In vivo labelling of the neuronal dopamine uptake complex in the mouse striatum by [3H]GBR 12783

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improvement of postischemic acute renal failure with the novel orally active endothelin-A receptor antagonist LU 135252 in the rat.

             R Birck,  T. Knoll,  C. Braun (1998)
            The endothelin (ET) system may play an important role in the pathogenesis of acute renal failure (ARF). We hypothesize that the course of ARF in an ischemia-reperfusion model will be markedly attenuated by the orally active ET(A)-receptor antagonist LU 135252 (LU) because of an improvement of renal perfusion. ARF was induced in rats by clamping both renal arteries for 60 min. The study was divided into two parts. In part 1, Rats received LU orally (100 mg/kg/day) starting 1 h after induction of ARF for 14 days. Cr(s), Cl(cr) and FE(na) were measured on days 1, 6, 9, and 14 after ARF. Cr(s) was lower in the treatment group on days 1 [1.3 +/- 0.31 mg/dl (n = 9) vs. 2.7 +/- 0.46 mg/dl (n = 10); p < 0.05] and 6 [0.5 +/- 0.1 mg/dl (n = 9) vs. 1.0 +/- 0.2 mg/dl (n = 9); p < 0.05], and Cl(cr) was higher on day 1 [0.9 +/- 0.17 ml/min (n = 9) vs. 0.2 +/- 0.1 ml/min (n = 8); p < 0.05] and 6 [1.8 +/- 0.29 ml/min (n = 9) vs. 1.0 +/- 0.21 ml/min (n = 9); p < 0.05] compared with vehicle. Additionally, FE(na) was lower in treated rats on day 1 [1 +/- 0.4% (n = 9) vs. 8 +/- 3% (n = 8); p < 0.051 compared with vehicle. In part 2, ARF was induced as described. Treated animals received 10 mg/kg LU on days 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 14 after ARF as an i.v. bolus injection. RBF, cortex blood flow (CBF), and medulla blood flow (MBF) were measured after application of LU on the same days: LU induced an increase in RBF (day 1: 14 +/- 5.3%, n = 6, p = 0.04; day 3: 15 +/- 2.8%, n = 8; p = 0.0008; day 6: 21 +/- 5.8%, n = 6, p = 0.02; day 9: 13 +/- 4%, n = 6; p = 0.03) and CBF (day 1: 8 +/- 2.2%, n = 7, p = 0.03; day 3: 7 +/- 2.5%, n = 7; p = 0.05; day 6: 18 +/- 4.8%, n = 6, p = 0.04; day 9: 10 +/- 2.5%, n = 6; p = 0.008) up to the first 9 days. MBF did increase on days 1 (9 +/- 3.1%, n = 6; p = 0.04) and 6 (13 +/- 3.6%, n = 6; p = 0.03). Our data confirm the hypothesis that ET plays a major role in the genesis of ARF associated with ischemia-reperfusion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Erratum

                (1990)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EXN
                Nephron Exp Nephrol
                10.1159/issn.1660-2129
                Cardiorenal Medicine
                S. Karger AG
                1660-2129
                2000
                October 2000
                31 July 2000
                : 8
                : 4-5
                : 283-290
                Affiliations
                aFifth Department of Medicine (Nephrology/Endocrinology), University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, and bKnoll AG, Ludwigshafen, Germany
                Article
                20680 Exp Nephrol 2000;8:283–290
                10.1159/000020680
                10940728
                © 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 1, References: 29, Pages: 8
                Product
                Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/20680
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Comments

                Comment on this article