+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Imaging of the Spatial Density Distribution on the Capsule of the Lens with Scheimpflug Photography


      Ophthalmic Research

      S. Karger AG

      Capsular density, Geometric correction, Scheimpfiug imaging, Human lens

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The density characteristics of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the lens, although of primary importance for its optical quality, are difficult to determine. Scheimpflug photography, however, allows distinct density measurements from the optical axis towards the periphery with the only limitation of a sufficient mydriasis, so that a 3-dimensional scatter profile of both capsular surfaces can be calculated via multilinear densitometric evaluation of a sufficient number of meridians. On this methodical basis, we analysed Scheimpfiug images recorded with the Topcon SL·45 on Kodak T-Max 400 film from 25 patients in an age range between 19 and 63 years. Images from the 0° + 45° meridians were scanned with multilinear microdensitometry and the data computed to get a density profile. In general, most scattering profiles show a marked interindividual variability. Nevertheless, a general trend can be established between the periphery and the center of the anterior and posterior capsules: (a) the anterior capsule generally has a higher density than the posterior; (b) in most cases, the center of the posterior capsule has a higher density than the periphery; (c) the anterior capsule has a more uniform spatial density distribution in all cases. From the cases evaluated, it can be concluded that the density of the peripheral posterior capsule is more importantly influenced by shading effects of the iris, so that geometrical correction is needed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Ophthalmic Res
          Ophthalmic Research
          S. Karger AG
          11 December 2009
          : 28
          : Suppl 2
          : 86-91
          Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Bonn, Germany
          267961 Ophthalmic Res 1996;28:86–91
          © 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 6


          Comment on this article