Blog
About

8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The jaundiced heart: evidence of blunted response to positive inotropic stimulation.

      Renal Failure

      drug effects, etiology, Analysis of Variance, Blood Pressure, Cholestasis, complications, physiopathology, Dobutamine, pharmacology, Female, Acute Kidney Injury, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Contraction, physiology, Stimulation, Chemical, Stroke Volume

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Obstructive jaundice has been known to cause severe hemodynamic disturbance. The present study was therefore designed to assess the cardiac involvement in jaundiced patients. The multiple-gated blood pool cardioscintigraphic studies were done in 9 jaundiced patients who had either cholestatic or obstructive jaundice (mean total bilirubin 29.30 +/- 3.30 mg/dL), and in 8 normal volunteers (total bilirubin less than 1 mg%). None of the patients had evidences of obvious cirrhosis, intrinisic heart disease, or septicemia. Following intravenous dobutamine there was comparable change of blood pressure and heart rate in both groups. However the response of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to dobutamine (10 micrograms/kg/min x 5 min) was strikingly blunted in the jaundiced patients as compared to that seen in the normal controls (3.56 +/- 0.9 vs. 12.7 +/- 2.2%, p less than 0.005). Our present data thus show that there is blunted myocardial contractile response to the inotropic stimulation in jaundiced patients. Such myocardial refractoriness to beta-1 stimulation may contribute to the susceptibility of jaundiced patients to postoperative shock and acute renal failure.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          1924912

          Comments

          Comment on this article