49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification and Analysis of Genome-Wide SNPs Provide Insight into Signatures of Selection and Domestication in Channel Catfish ( Ictalurus punctatus)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Domestication and selection for important performance traits can impact the genome, which is most often reflected by reduced heterozygosity in and surrounding genes related to traits affected by selection. In this study, analysis of the genomic impact caused by domestication and artificial selection was conducted by investigating the signatures of selection using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in channel catfish ( Ictalurus punctatus). A total of 8.4 million candidate SNPs were identified by using next generation sequencing. On average, the channel catfish genome harbors one SNP per 116 bp. Approximately 6.6 million, 5.3 million, 4.9 million, 7.1 million and 6.7 million SNPs were detected in the Marion, Thompson, USDA103, Hatchery strain, and wild population, respectively. The allele frequencies of 407,861 SNPs differed significantly between the domestic and wild populations. With these SNPs, 23 genomic regions with putative selective sweeps were identified that included 11 genes. Although the function for the majority of the genes remain unknown in catfish, several genes with known function related to aquaculture performance traits were included in the regions with selective sweeps. These included hypoxia-inducible factor 1β· HIFι β ¨ and the transporter gene ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 5 ( ABCB5). HIF 1β· is important for response to hypoxia and tolerance to low oxygen levels is a critical aquaculture trait. The large numbers of SNPs identified from this study are valuable for the development of high-density SNP arrays for genetic and genomic studies of performance traits in catfish.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation.

            A population can adapt to a rapid environmental change or habitat expansion in two ways. It may adapt either through new beneficial mutations that subsequently sweep through the population or by using alleles from the standing genetic variation. We use diffusion theory to calculate the probabilities for selective adaptations and find a large increase in the fixation probability for weak substitutions, if alleles originate from the standing genetic variation. We then determine the parameter regions where each scenario-standing variation vs. new mutations-is more likely. Adaptations from the standing genetic variation are favored if either the selective advantage is weak or the selection coefficient and the mutation rate are both high. Finally, we analyze the probability of "soft sweeps," where multiple copies of the selected allele contribute to a substitution, and discuss the consequences for the footprint of selection on linked neutral variation. We find that soft sweeps with weaker selective footprints are likely under both scenarios if the mutation rate and/or the selection coefficient is high.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation.

              There has long been interest in understanding the genetic basis of human adaptation. To what extent are phenotypic differences among human populations driven by natural selection? With the recent arrival of large genome-wide data sets on human variation, there is now unprecedented opportunity for progress on this type of question. Several lines of evidence argue for an important role of positive selection in shaping human variation and differences among populations. These include studies of comparative morphology and physiology, as well as population genetic studies of candidate loci and genome-wide data. However, the data also suggest that it is unusual for strong selection to drive new mutations rapidly to fixation in particular populations (the 'hard sweep' model). We argue, instead, for alternatives to the hard sweep model: in particular, polygenic adaptation could allow rapid adaptation while not producing classical signatures of selective sweeps. We close by discussing some of the likely opportunities for progress in the field. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                14 October 2014
                : 9
                : 10
                : e109666
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Fish Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Aquatic Genomics Unit, School of Fisheries, Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences, and Program of Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America
                [2 ]USDA-ARS Warmwater Aquaculture Research Unit, Stoneville, Mississippi, United States of America
                University of Iceland, Iceland
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: LS ZL. Performed the experiments: LS SL RW. Analyzed the data: LS SL RW YJ YZ JZ LB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LK RD GW ZL. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: LS SL RW GW ZL.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-11771
                10.1371/journal.pone.0109666
                4196944
                25313648
                9fa52d80-ba1f-43cb-a146-fa0816de2038
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 15 March 2014
                : 2 September 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                This project was supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2010-65205-20356 and 2012-67015-19410 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA). L. Sun was supported by a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (CSC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                DNA
                Genetics
                Animal Genetics
                Genomics
                Custom metadata
                The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. The Illumina HiSeq sequencing data can be accessed from the NCBI Short Read Archive under project ID: SRA075234. All the SNPs identified in this project are deposited in the National Animal Genome Research Program Aquaculture Genomics Data Repository ( www.animalgenome.org/repository/pub/auburn2014.0530/).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article