7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) simulated hydrological impacts of land use change from temperate grassland to energy crops: A case study in western UK

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          When considering the large‐scale deployment of bioenergy crops, it is important to understand the implication for ecosystem hydrological processes and the influences of crop type and location. Based on the potential for future land use change (LUC), the 10,280 km 2 West Wales Water Framework Directive River Basin District (UK) was selected as a typical grassland dominated district, and the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrology model with a geographic information systems interface was used to investigate implications for different bioenergy deployment scenarios. The study area was delineated into 855 sub‐basins and 7,108 hydrological response units based on rivers, soil type, land use, and slope. Changes in hydrological components for two bioenergy crops ( Miscanthus and short rotation coppice, SRC) planted on 50% (2,192 km 2) or 25% (1,096 km 2) of existing improved pasture are quantified. Across the study area as a whole, only surface run‐off with SRC planted at the 50% level was significantly impacted, where it was reduced by up to 23% (during April). However, results varied spatially and a comparison of annual means for each sub‐basin and scenario revealed surface run‐off was significantly decreased and baseflow significantly increased (by a maximum of 40%) with both Miscanthus and SRC. Evapotranspiration was significantly increased with SRC (at both planting levels) and water yield was significantly reduced with SRC (at the 50% level) by up to 5%. Effects on streamflow were limited, varying between −5% and +5% change (compared to baseline) in the majority of sub‐basins. The results suggest that for mesic temperate grasslands, adverse effects from the drying of soil and alterations to streamflow may not arise, and with surface run‐off reduced and baseflow increased, there could, depending on crop location, be potential benefits for flood and erosion mitigation.

          Abstract

          Using the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), we investigate changes to hydrology following land conversion of 50% and 25% of existing improved pasture in western UK to the bioenergy crop Miscanthus or short rotation coppice (SRC). Soil water content and streamflow were not significantly changed compared to the baseline scenario of existing land use. Surface run‐off was reduced for both crops (by up to 40%), whereas evapotranspiration was increased with SRC (by up to 5%), and reduced with Miscanthus (by up to 2%). Reductions in surface run‐off throughout the year could have potential benefits for flood mitigation schemes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.

          The flow regime is regarded by many aquatic ecologists to be the key driver of river and floodplain wetland ecosystems. We have focused this literature review around four key principles to highlight the important mechanisms that link hydrology and aquatic biodiversity and to illustrate the consequent impacts of altered flow regimes: Firstly, flow is a major determinant of physical habitat in streams, which in turn is a major determinant of biotic composition; Secondly, aquatic species have evolved life history strategies primarily in direct response to the natural flow regimes; Thirdly, maintenance of natural patterns of longitudinal and lateral connectivity is essential to the viability of populations of many riverine species; Finally, the invasion and success of exotic and introduced species in rivers is facilitated by the alteration of flow regimes. The impacts of flow change are manifest across broad taxonomic groups including riverine plants, invertebrates, and fish. Despite growing recognition of these relationships, ecologists still struggle to predict and quantify biotic responses to altered flow regimes. One obvious difficulty is the ability to distinguish the direct effects of modified flow regimes from impacts associated with land-use change that often accompanies water resource development. Currently, evidence about how rivers function in relation to flow regime and the flows that aquatic organisms need exists largely as a series of untested hypotheses. To overcome these problems, aquatic science needs to move quickly into a manipulative or experimental phase, preferably with the aims of restoration and measuring ecosystem response.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                amh21@aber.ac.uk
                Journal
                Glob Change Biol Bioenergy
                Glob Change Biol Bioenergy
                10.1111/(ISSN)1757-1707
                GCBB
                Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1757-1693
                1757-1707
                26 July 2019
                November 2019
                : 11
                : 11 ( doiID: 10.1111/gcbb.v11.11 )
                : 1298-1317
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS) Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth UK
                [ 2 ] Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Lancaster Environment Centre Lancaster UK
                [ 3 ] College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Amanda J. Holder, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Wales SY23 3EQ, UK.

                Email: amh21@ 123456aber.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5355-2525
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-9574
                Article
                GCBB12628
                10.1111/gcbb.12628
                6853257
                9fe50baa-c571-4c93-a94c-a106257f05cb
                © 2019 The Authors. GCB Bioenergy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 April 2019
                : 09 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 8, Pages: 20, Words: 13715
                Funding
                Funded by: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000266;
                Award ID: EP/ M013200/1
                Funded by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000268;
                Funded by: Institute of Biology, Environment and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University
                Funded by: MAGLUE
                Funded by: Energy Technologies Institute
                Funded by: National Environment Research Council
                Award ID: NE/H01067X/1
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.1 mode:remove_FC converted:13.11.2019

                bioenergy,evapotranspiration,flooding,hydrology,miscanthus,short rotation coppice,streamflow

                Comments

                Comment on this article