26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Circuits Regulating Pleasure and Happiness—Mechanisms of Depression

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          According to our model of the regulation of appetitive-searching vs. distress-avoiding behaviors, the motivation to display these essential conducts is regulated by two parallel cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical, re-entry circuits, including the core and the shell parts of the nucleus accumbens, respectively. An entire series of basal ganglia, running from the caudate nucleus on one side, to the centromedial amygdala on the other side, controls the intensity of these reward-seeking and misery-fleeing behaviors by stimulating the activity of the (pre)frontal and limbic cortices. Hyperactive motivation to display behavior that potentially results in reward induces feelings of hankering (relief leads to pleasure). Hyperactive motivation to exhibit behavior related to avoidance of misery results in dysphoria (relief leads to happiness). These two systems collaborate in a reciprocal fashion. In clinical depression, a mismatch exists between the activities of these two circuits: the balance is shifted to the misery-avoiding side. Five theories have been developed to explain the mechanism of depressive mood disorders, including the monoamine, biorhythm, neuro-endocrine, neuro-immune, and kindling/neuroplasticity theories. This paper describes these theories in relationship to the model (described above) of the regulation of reward-seeking vs. misery-avoiding behaviors. Chronic stress that leads to structural changes may induce the mismatch between the two systems. This mismatch leads to lack of pleasure, low energy, and indecisiveness, on one hand, and dysphoria, continuous worrying, and negative expectations on the other hand. The neuroplastic effects of monoamines, cortisol, and cytokines may mediate the induction of these structural alterations. Long-term exposure to stressful situations (particularly experienced during childhood) may lead to increased susceptibility for developing this condition. This hypothesis opens up the possibility of treating depression with psychotherapy. Genetic and other biological factors (toxic, infectious, or traumatic) may increase sensitivity to the induction of relevant neuroplastic changes. Reversal or compensation of these neuroplastic adjustments may explain the effects of biological therapies in treating depression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references150

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target.

            Crosstalk between inflammatory pathways and neurocircuits in the brain can lead to behavioural responses, such as avoidance and alarm, that are likely to have provided early humans with an evolutionary advantage in their interactions with pathogens and predators. However, in modern times, such interactions between inflammation and the brain appear to drive the development of depression and may contribute to non-responsiveness to current antidepressant therapies. Recent data have elucidated the mechanisms by which the innate and adaptive immune systems interact with neurotransmitters and neurocircuits to influence the risk for depression. Here, we detail our current understanding of these pathways and discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting the immune system to treat depression.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making.

              Some have claimed that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) mediates decision making. Others suggest mPFC is selectively involved in the retrieval of remote long-term memory. Yet others suggests mPFC supports memory and consolidation on time scales ranging from seconds to days. How can all these roles be reconciled? We propose that the function of the mPFC is to learn associations between context, locations, events, and corresponding adaptive responses, particularly emotional responses. Thus, the ubiquitous involvement of mPFC in both memory and decision making may be due to the fact that almost all such tasks entail the ability to recall the best action or emotional response to specific events in a particular place and time. An interaction between multiple memory systems may explain the changing importance of mPFC to different types of memories over time. In particular, mPFC likely relies on the hippocampus to support rapid learning and memory consolidation. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                10 November 2016
                2016
                : 10
                : 571
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands
                [2] 2GGZ WNB, Mental Health Hospital Bergen op Zoom, Netherlands
                [3] 3Mental Health Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Tomsk, Russia
                [4] 4National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University Tomsk, Russia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Rajeev Krishnadas, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK

                Reviewed by: Jonathan Ipser, University of California, San Diego, USA; Arron Metcalfe, University of Toronto, Canada

                *Correspondence: Anton J. M. Loonen a.j.m.loonen@ 123456rug.nl
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2016.00571
                5102894
                27891086
                9ff8d59f-4661-42dc-9be9-974dde0dcd50
                Copyright © 2016 Loonen and Ivanova.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 March 2016
                : 27 October 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 198, Pages: 25, Words: 18805
                Funding
                Funded by: Russian Foundation for Basic Research 10.13039/501100002261
                Award ID: 14-04-01157a
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Hypothesis and Theory

                Neurosciences
                depression,stress,mechanism,basal ganglia,amygdala,habenula,neuroplasticity
                Neurosciences
                depression, stress, mechanism, basal ganglia, amygdala, habenula, neuroplasticity

                Comments

                Comment on this article