11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      [Suspicion for intraabdominal adhesions -- is open laparoscopy the gold standard?].

      Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie
      Abdomen, Female, Genital Diseases, Female, surgery, Humans, Laparoscopy, adverse effects, methods

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Laparoscopy is used for most surgical procedures in gynaecology. In general complications are rare. However, one of the most critical steps is the initial laparoscopic entry into the peritoneal cavity. According to the literature serious complications occur in approximately 1-2/1 000 cases. Whereas major vascular injuries are mainly recognised immediately, delayed recognition of bowel injuries is frequent. Complication rates of different entry procedures used in gynaecological laparoscopy are similar even in high risk patients (intraperitoneal adhesions, obesity). Utilising an open - instead a closed - entry (either by Veress needle or first trocar) technique or alternativ entry positions are suggested by some authors. This review presents data available in the literature and highlights that open laparoscopy is no gold standard.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          16341981
          10.1055/s-2005-836905

          Chemistry
          Abdomen,Female,Genital Diseases, Female,surgery,Humans,Laparoscopy,adverse effects,methods
          Chemistry
          Abdomen, Female, Genital Diseases, Female, surgery, Humans, Laparoscopy, adverse effects, methods

          Comments

          Comment on this article