14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Social complexity and linguistic diversity in the Austronesian and Bantu population expansions.

      Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
      Africa South of the Sahara, African Continental Ancestry Group, genetics, Asia, Southeastern, Bayes Theorem, Biological Evolution, Cultural Evolution, Ethnic Groups, Geography, Humans, Language, Linguistics, Madagascar, Oceania, Oceanic Ancestry Group, Phylogeny, Political Systems, classification, Population Dynamics

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Reconstructing the rise and fall of social complexity in human societies through time is fundamental for understanding some of the most important transformations in human history. Phylogenetic methods based on language diversity provide a means to reconstruct pre-historic events and model the transition rates of cultural change through time. We model and compare the evolution of social complexity in Austronesian (n = 88) and Bantu (n = 89) societies, two of the world's largest language families with societies representing a wide spectrum of social complexity. Our results show that in both language families, social complexity tends to build and decline in an incremental fashion, while the Austronesian phylogeny provides evidence for additional severe demographic bottlenecks. We suggest that the greater linguistic diversity of the Austronesian language family than Bantu likely follows the different biogeographic structure of the two regions. Cultural evolution in both the Bantu and Austronesian cases was not a simple linear process, but more of a wave-like process closely tied to the demography of expanding populations and the spatial structure of the colonized regions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article