9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Randomized, controlled trial of lasmiditan over four migraine attacks: Findings from the CENTURION study

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We present findings from the multicenter, double-blind Phase 3 study, CENTURION. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of and consistency of response to lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine across four attacks.

          Methods

          Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to one of three treatment groups – lasmiditan 200 mg; lasmiditan 100 mg; or a control group that received placebo for three attacks and lasmiditan 50 mg for either the third or fourth attack. The primary endpoints were pain freedom at 2 h (first attack) and pain freedom at 2 h in ≥2/3 attacks. Secondary endpoints included pain relief, sustained pain freedom and disability freedom. Statistical testing used a logistic regression model and graphical methodology to control for multiplicity.

          Results

          Overall, 1471 patients treated ≥1 migraine attack with the study drug. Both primary endpoints were met for lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg ( p < 0.001). All gated secondary endpoints were met. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was highest during the first attack. The most common TEAEs with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, and nausea; these were generally mild or moderate in severity.

          Conclusions

          These results confirm the early and sustained efficacy of lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg and demonstrate consistency of response across multiple attacks.

          Trial Registration Number: NCT03670810

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine is associated with new-onset chronic migraine.

          To test the hypothesis that ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine (EM) is associated with an increased risk for the subsequent onset of chronic migraine (CM).
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine

            Lasmiditan is a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist without vasoconstrictive activity. In this phase 3 double-blind placebo-controlled study, Goadsby et al. show that lasmiditan is efficacious and relatively well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine in adults, including those with cardiovascular risk factors or a prior history of cardiovascular events.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures.

              For clinical trials with multiple treatment arms or endpoints a variety of sequentially rejective, weighted Bonferroni-type tests have been proposed, such as gatekeeping procedures, fixed sequence tests, and fallback procedures. They allow to map the difference in importance as well as the relationship between the various research questions onto an adequate multiple test procedure. Since these procedures rely on the closed test principle, they usually require the explicit specification of a large number of intersection hypotheses tests. The underlying test strategy may therefore be difficult to communicate. We propose a simple iterative graphical approach to construct and perform such Bonferroni-type tests. The resulting multiple test procedures are represented by directed, weighted graphs, where each node corresponds to an elementary hypothesis, together with a simple algorithm to generate such graphs while sequentially testing the individual hypotheses. The approach is illustrated with the visualization of several common gatekeeping strategies. A case study is used to illustrate how the methods from this article can be used to tailor a multiple test procedure to given study objectives.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cephalalgia
                Cephalalgia
                CEP
                spcep
                Cephalalgia
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                0333-1024
                1468-2982
                4 February 2021
                March 2021
                : 41
                : 3
                : 294-304
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Danish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [2 ]Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [3 ]StudyMetrix Research, St Peters, MO, USA
                [4 ]Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Judith Krikke-Workel, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46220, USA. Email: krikke-workel_judith_o@ 123456lilly.com
                Article
                10.1177_0333102421989232
                10.1177/0333102421989232
                7961651
                33541117
                a01fe990-56d4-4fc1-bda3-a60da79b735d
                © International Headache Society 2021

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 30 November 2020
                : 11 December 2020
                : 22 December 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Eli Lilly and Company, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100004312;
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts2

                Neurology
                phase 3,lasmiditan,efficacy,consistency,5-ht1f receptor agonist
                Neurology
                phase 3, lasmiditan, efficacy, consistency, 5-ht1f receptor agonist

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log