14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Structural Equation Modeling With Many Variables: A Systematic Review of Issues and Developments

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Survey data in social, behavioral, and health sciences often contain many variables ( p). Structural equation modeling (SEM) is commonly used to analyze such data. With a sufficient number of participants ( N), SEM enables researchers to easily set up and reliably test hypothetical relationships among theoretical constructs as well as those between the constructs and their observed indicators. However, SEM analyses with small N or large p have been shown to be problematic. This article reviews issues and solutions for SEM with small N, especially when p is large. The topics addressed include methods for parameter estimation, test statistics for overall model evaluation, and reliable standard errors for evaluating the significance of parameter estimates. Previous recommendations on required sample size N are also examined together with more recent developments. In particular, the requirement for N with conventional methods can be a lot more than expected, whereas new advances and developments can reduce the requirement for N substantially. The issues and developments for SEM with many variables described in this article not only let applied researchers be aware of the cutting edge methodology for SEM with big data as characterized by a large p but also highlight the challenges that methodologists need to face in further investigation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).

          Resilience may be viewed as a measure of stress coping ability and, as such, could be an important target of treatment in anxiety, depression, and stress reactions. We describe a new rating scale to assess resilience. The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) comprises of 25 items, each rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), with higher scores reflecting greater resilience. The scale was administered to subjects in the following groups: community sample, primary care outpatients, general psychiatric outpatients, clinical trial of generalized anxiety disorder, and two clinical trials of PTSD. The reliability, validity, and factor analytic structure of the scale were evaluated, and reference scores for study samples were calculated. Sensitivity to treatment effects was examined in subjects from the PTSD clinical trials. The scale demonstrated good psychometric properties and factor analysis yielded five factors. A repeated measures ANOVA showed that an increase in CD-RISC score was associated with greater improvement during treatment. Improvement in CD-RISC score was noted in proportion to overall clinical global improvement, with greatest increase noted in subjects with the highest global improvement and deterioration in CD-RISC score in those with minimal or no global improvement. The CD-RISC has sound psychometric properties and distinguishes between those with greater and lesser resilience. The scale demonstrates that resilience is modifiable and can improve with treatment, with greater improvement corresponding to higher levels of global improvement. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Properties of Sufficiency and Statistical Tests

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                25 April 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 580
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, Beihang University , Beijing, China
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame , Notre Dame, IN, United States
                [3] 3School of Human Development and Organizational Studies in Education, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Georgios Sideridis, Harvard Medical School, United States

                Reviewed by: Augustin Kelava, Universität Tübingen, Germany; Claudio Barbaranelli, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy

                *Correspondence: Lifang Deng lifangdeng@ 123456buaa.edu.cn

                This article was submitted to Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00580
                5932371
                29755388
                a0266792-f6bb-4592-8deb-c2b343879828
                Copyright © 2018 Deng, Yang and Marcoulides.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 January 2018
                : 05 April 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 5, References: 117, Pages: 14, Words: 12923
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation 10.13039/100000001
                Award ID: SES- 1461355
                Funded by: Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China
                Award ID: 15YJCZH027
                Categories
                Psychology
                Systematic Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                structural equation modeling,small sample size,parameter estimates,test statistics,stand errors

                Comments

                Comment on this article