20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Complying with the Guideline for Quality and Equivalence for Topical Semisolid Products: The Case of Clotrimazole Cream

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Semisolids constitute a significant proportion of topical pharmaceutical dosage forms available on the market, with creams being considered profitable systems for releasing active substances into the skin. This work aimed at the development of a generic Clotrimazole topical cream, based on the assumptions that assist the development of such formulations. First, the critical parameters to obtain a final formulation as similar as possible to the reference product were defined. Then, the percentages of cetyl palmitate and octyldodecanol were identified as critical variables and chosen for optimization in further studies. A “quality by design” approach was then used to identify the effect of process variability on the structural and functional similarity (Q3) of the generic product qualitatively (Q1) and quantitatively (Q2). A two-factor central composite orthogonal design was applied and eleven different formulations were developed and subjected to physicochemical characterization and product performance studies. The results were used to estimate the influence of the two variables in the variation of the responses, and to determine the optimum point of the tested factors, using a design space approach. Finally, an optimized formulation was obtained and analysed in parallel with the reference. The obtained results agreed with the prediction of the chemometric analysis, validating the reliability of the developed multivariate models. The in vitro release and permeation results were similar for the reference and the generic formulations, supporting the importance of interplaying microstructure properties with product performance and stability. Lastly, based on quality targets and response constraints, optimal working conditions were successfully achieved.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles.

          Over recent years, drug release/dissolution from solid pharmaceutical dosage forms has been the subject of intense and profitable scientific developments. Whenever a new solid dosage form is developed or produced, it is necessary to ensure that drug dissolution occurs in an appropriate manner. The pharmaceutical industry and the registration authorities do focus, nowadays, on drug dissolution studies. The quantitative analysis of the values obtained in dissolution/release tests is easier when mathematical formulas that express the dissolution results as a function of some of the dosage forms characteristics are used. In some cases, these mathematic models are derived from the theoretical analysis of the occurring process. In most of the cases the theoretical concept does not exist and some empirical equations have proved to be more appropriate. Drug dissolution from solid dosage forms has been described by kinetic models in which the dissolved amount of drug (Q) is a function of the test time, t or Q=f(t). Some analytical definitions of the Q(t) function are commonly used, such as zero order, first order, Hixson-Crowell, Weibull, Higuchi, Baker-Lonsdale, Korsmeyer-Peppas and Hopfenberg models. Other release parameters, such as dissolution time (tx%), assay time (tx min), dissolution efficacy (ED), difference factor (f1), similarity factor (f2) and Rescigno index (xi1 and xi2) can be used to characterize drug dissolution/release profiles.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            DDSolver: an add-in program for modeling and comparison of drug dissolution profiles.

            In recent years, several mathematical models have been developed for analysis of drug dissolution data, and many different mathematical approaches have been proposed to assess the similarity between two drug dissolution profiles. However, until now, no computer program has been reported for simplifying the calculations involved in the modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. The purposes of this article are: (1) to describe the development of a software program, called DDSolver, for facilitating the assessment of similarity between drug dissolution data; (2) to establish a model library for fitting dissolution data using a nonlinear optimization method; and (3) to provide a brief review of available approaches for comparing drug dissolution profiles. DDSolver is a freely available program which is capable of performing most existing techniques for comparing drug release data, including exploratory data analysis, univariate ANOVA, ratio test procedures, the difference factor f (1), the similarity factor f (2), the Rescigno indices, the 90% confidence interval (CI) of difference method, the multivariate statistical distance method, the model-dependent method, the bootstrap f (2) method, and Chow and Ki's time series method. Sample runs of the program demonstrated that the results were satisfactory, and DDSolver could be served as a useful tool for dissolution data analysis.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding pharmaceutical quality by design.

              This review further clarifies the concept of pharmaceutical quality by design (QbD) and describes its objectives. QbD elements include the following: (1) a quality target product profile (QTPP) that identifies the critical quality attributes (CQAs) of the drug product; (2) product design and understanding including identification of critical material attributes (CMAs); (3) process design and understanding including identification of critical process parameters (CPPs), linking CMAs and CPPs to CQAs; (4) a control strategy that includes specifications for the drug substance(s), excipient(s), and drug product as well as controls for each step of the manufacturing process; and (5) process capability and continual improvement. QbD tools and studies include prior knowledge, risk assessment, mechanistic models, design of experiments (DoE) and data analysis, and process analytical technology (PAT). As the pharmaceutical industry moves toward the implementation of pharmaceutical QbD, a common terminology, understanding of concepts and expectations are necessary. This understanding will facilitate better communication between those involved in risk-based drug development and drug application review.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Pharmaceutics
                Pharmaceutics
                pharmaceutics
                Pharmaceutics
                MDPI
                1999-4923
                14 April 2021
                April 2021
                : 13
                : 4
                : 555
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Research Institute for Medicine (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal; teresaalves@ 123456campus.ul.pt (T.A.); amartins@ 123456farm-id.pt (A.M.); hribeiro@ 123456campus.ul.pt (H.R.); sraposo@ 123456edol.pt (S.R.)
                [2 ]Laboratório Edol—Produtos Farmacêuticos, S.A., 2795-225 Linda-a-Velha, Portugal; darranca@ 123456edol.pt
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: jmmarto@ 123456ff.ulisboa.pt ; Tel.: +351-217-500-769
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4822-3249
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2429-7991
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-5622
                Article
                pharmaceutics-13-00555
                10.3390/pharmaceutics13040555
                8071103
                a0326dec-9dea-418f-994b-5f3550810272
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 23 February 2021
                : 08 April 2021
                Categories
                Article

                generic medicine,pharmaceutical development,quality by design,rheology,topical delivery system

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log