55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      From Text to Thought: How Analyzing Language Can Advance Psychological Science

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Humans have been using language for millennia but have only just begun to scratch the surface of what natural language can reveal about the mind. Here we propose that language offers a unique window into psychology. After briefly summarizing the legacy of language analyses in psychological science, we show how methodological advances have made these analyses more feasible and insightful than ever before. In particular, we describe how two forms of language analysis—natural-language processing and comparative linguistics—are contributing to how we understand topics as diverse as emotion, creativity, and religion and overcoming obstacles related to statistical power and culturally diverse samples. We summarize resources for learning both of these methods and highlight the best way to combine language analysis with more traditional psychological paradigms. Applying language analysis to large-scale and cross-cultural datasets promises to provide major breakthroughs in psychological science.

          Related collections

          Most cited references181

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The weirdest people in the world?

          Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these "standard subjects" are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re-organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.

            Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.

              At the heart of emotion, mood, and any other emotionally charged event are states experienced as simply feeling good or bad, energized or enervated. These states--called core affect--influence reflexes, perception, cognition, and behavior and are influenced by many causes internal and external, but people have no direct access to these causal connections. Core affect can therefore be experienced as free-floating (mood) or can be attributed to some cause (and thereby begin an emotional episode). These basic processes spawn a broad framework that includes perception of the core-affect-altering properties of stimuli, motives, empathy, emotional meta-experience, and affect versus emotion regulation; it accounts for prototypical emotional episodes, such as fear and anger, as core affect attributed to something plus various nonemotional processes.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Perspect Psychol Sci
                Perspect Psychol Sci
                PPS
                sppps
                Perspectives on Psychological Science
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1745-6916
                1745-6924
                4 October 2021
                May 2022
                : 17
                : 3
                : 805-826
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
                [2 ]Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
                [3 ]Center for Research on Evolution, Belief, and Behaviour, University of Otago
                [4 ]Religion Programme, University of Otago
                Author notes
                [*]Joshua Conrad Jackson, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University Email: joshua.jackson@ 123456kellogg.northwestern.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-9815
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7737-273X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5368-9302
                Article
                10.1177_17456916211004899
                10.1177/17456916211004899
                9069665
                34606730
                a0332b70-c779-456d-bace-da3ca7d8165f
                © The Author(s) 2021

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: national science foundation, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001;
                Award ID: BCS 1941712
                Funded by: Royster Society of Fellows, ;
                Funded by: john templeton foundation, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000925;
                Funded by: Marsden Foundation of New Zealand, ;
                Funded by: european research council, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000781;
                Funded by: national institute on drug abuse, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000026;
                Award ID: R01DA051127
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                natural-language processing,comparative linguistics,historical linguistics,psycholinguistics,cultural evolution,emotion,religion,creativity

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log