21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Population-Based Screening for Family History of End-Stage Renal Disease among Incident Dialysis Patients

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: We determined the familial aggregation of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in a large, population-based sample of incident ESRD cases to assess the feasibility of developing a targeted screening and prevention program directed at members of families at high risk for kidney disease. Methods: Between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2003, incident dialysis patients in ESRD Network 6 facilities were asked to complete a voluntary questionnaire on family history (FH) of ESRD. Cases with ESRD attributed to Mendelian diseases or urologic causes were excluded. FH was considered present if first- or second-degree relatives had ESRD. De-identified FH data were collated with demographic data at dialysis initiation. Results: More than 46% of eligible patients (25,883/55,929) provided FH information and 22.8% (5,901/25,883) of these reported having a FH of ESRD. FH of ESRD was positively associated with female gender, earlier age at ESRD onset, and primary cause of ESRD, and negatively associated with white race. FH associations with age, race, gender, and primary cause of renal failure remained statistically significant after simultaneous adjustment in a multivariate logistic regression model. Conclusions: Approximately23% of incident dialysis patients have close relatives with ESRD. Far more are likely to have relatives with clinically silent proteinuria or chronic kidney disease (CKD), both risk factors for future cardiovascular events and ESRD. Physicians caring for patients with CKD should be aware of the marked familial aggregation of ESRD and consider focusing screening efforts on high-risk family members in an attempt to slow the exponential growth rate of kidney disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Familial clustering of diabetic kidney disease. Evidence for genetic susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy.

          Diabetic nephropathy develops in less than half of all patients with diabetes. To study heredity as a possible risk factor for diabetic kidney disease, we examined the concordance rates for diabetic nephropathy in two sets of families in which both probands and siblings had diabetes mellitus. In one set, the probands (n = 11) had no evidence of diabetic nephropathy, with normal creatinine clearance and a urinary albumin excretion rate below 45 mg per day. In the other set, the probands (n = 26) had undergone kidney transplantation because of diabetic nephropathy. Evidence of nephropathy was found in 2 of the 12 diabetic siblings of the probands without nephropathy (17 percent). Of the 29 diabetic siblings of probands with diabetic nephropathy, 24 (83 percent) had evidence of nephropathy (P less than 0.001), including 12 with end-stage renal disease. No significant differences were noted between the sibling groups with respect to the duration of diabetes, blood pressure, glycemic control, or glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Logistic regression analysis found nephropathy in the proband to be the only factor significantly predictive of the renal status of the diabetic sibling. We conclude that diabetic nephropathy occurs in familial clusters. This is consistent with the hypothesis that heredity helps to determine susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy. However, this study cannot rule out the possible influences of environmental factors shared by siblings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Health-related quality of life among dialysis patients on three continents: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

            Assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) can provide information on the types and degrees of burdens that afflict patients with chronic medical conditions, including end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Several studies have shown important international differences among ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis, but no studies have compared these patients' HRQOL. Our goal was to document international differences in HRQOL among dialysis patients and to identify possible explanations of those differences. We examined data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), a prospective, observational, international study of hemodialysis patients. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of DOPPS data from the United States, five countries in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom), and Japan. Linear mixed models were used to analyze differences in HRQOL, using the KDQOL-SFTM. Norm-based scores were used to minimize cultural response bias. Linear regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding factors. Other variables included demographic variables, comorbidities, primary cause of ESRD, complications of ESRD and treatment, and socioeconomic status. In all generic HRQOL subscales, patients on all three continents had much lower scores than their respective population norm values. Patients in the United States had the highest scores on the mental health subscale and the highest mental component summary scores. Japanese patients reported better physical functioning than did patients in the United States or Europe, but they also reported the greatest burden of kidney disease. Overall, these differences remained even after adjusting for possible confounders. On all three continents, ESRD and hemodialysis profoundly affect HRQOL. In the United States, the effects on mental health are smaller than in other countries. Japanese hemodialysis patients perceived that their kidney disease imposes a greater burden, but their physical functioning was significantly higher. Different distributions of socioeconomic factors and major comorbid conditions could explain little of this difference in physical functioning. Other possible factors, such as quality of dialysis and related health care, deserve careful study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Screening for proteinuria in US adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

              Chronic kidney disease is a growing public health problem. Screening for early identification could improve health but could also lead to unnecessary harms and excess costs. To assess the value of periodic, population-based dipstick screening for early detection of urine protein in adults with neither hypertension nor diabetes and in adults with hypertension. Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov decision analytic model to compare a strategy of annual screening with no screening (usual care) for proteinuria at age 50 years followed by treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin II-receptor blocker (ARB). Cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). For persons with neither hypertension nor diabetes, the cost-effectiveness ratio for screening vs no screening (usual care) was unfavorable (282 818 dollars per QALY; incremental cost of 616 dollars and a gain of 0.0022 QALYs per person). However, screening such persons beginning at age 60 years yielded a more favorable ratio (53 372 dollars per QALY). For persons with hypertension, the ratio was highly favorable (18 621 dollars per QALY; incremental cost of 476 dollars and a gain of 0.03 QALYs per person). Cost-effectiveness was mediated by both chronic kidney disease progression and death prevention benefits of ACE inhibitor and ARB therapy. Influential parameters that might make screening for the general population more cost-effective include a greater incidence of proteinuria, age at screening (53 372 dollars per QALY for persons beginning screening at age 60 years), or lower frequency of screening (every 10 years: 80 700 dollars per QALY at age 50 years; 6195 dollars per QALY at age 60 years; and 5486 dollars per QALY at age 70 years). Early detection of urine protein to slow progression of chronic kidney disease and decrease mortality is not cost-effective unless selectively directed toward high-risk groups (older persons and persons with hypertension) or conducted at an infrequent interval of 10 years.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                AJN
                Am J Nephrol
                10.1159/issn.0250-8095
                American Journal of Nephrology
                S. Karger AG
                0250-8095
                1421-9670
                2005
                December 2005
                21 September 2005
                : 25
                : 6
                : 529-535
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C., bDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, cESRD Network 6/Southeastern Kidney Council, Inc., Raleigh, N.C., and dDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga., USA
                Article
                88491 Am J Nephrol 2005;25:529–535
                10.1159/000088491
                16179780
                a0397175-b564-467e-8a35-f27cfb4d102b
                © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 15 July 2005
                : 18 August 2005
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, References: 18, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Report: Patient-Oriented, Translational Research

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Diabetes mellitus,African Americans,Hypertension,Chronic kidney disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article