15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Constructing artificial respiratory chain in polymer compartments: Insights into the interplay between bo 3 oxidase and the membrane

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Analogous to phospholipids, some polymers assemble into vesicles and can mimic cellular membranes. Apart from enabling compartmentalization in the context of artificial cells, amphiphiles may serve as interface for proteins. However, complex transmembrane proteins were reconstituted in polymers with limited success so far. We functionally integrated the proton pump bo 3 oxidase (part of the bacterial respiratory chain) in synthetic membranes made of PDMS- g-PEO and demonstrated lumen acidification. We provided mechanistic insights into the interplay between the protein and the (semi)synthetic membrane by measuring bending rigidity, lateral diffusion and disorder, proton permeability, and protein partitioning. Polymer and hybrid membranes displayed favorable properties for the construction of artificial cells such as membrane rearrangement, enhanced stability and fluidity, while keeping the compartments proton-tight.

          Abstract

          Cytochrome bo 3 ubiquinol oxidase is a transmembrane protein, which oxidizes ubiquinone and reduces oxygen, while pumping protons. Apart from its combination with F 1F o-ATPase to assemble a minimal ATP regeneration module, the utility of the proton pump can be extended to other applications in the context of synthetic cells such as transport, signaling, and control of enzymatic reactions. In parallel, polymers have been speculated to be phospholipid mimics with respect to their ability to self-assemble in compartments with increased stability. However, their usability as interfaces for complex membrane proteins has remained questionable. In the present work, we optimized a fusion/electroformation approach to reconstitute bo 3 oxidase in giant unilamellar vesicles made of PDMS- g-PEO and/or phosphatidylcholine (PC). This enabled optical access, while microfluidic trapping allowed for online analysis of individual vesicles. The tight polymer membranes and the inward oriented enzyme caused 1 pH unit difference in 30 min, with an initial rate of 0.35 pH·min −1. To understand the interplay in these composite systems, we studied the relevant mechanical and rheological membrane properties. Remarkably, the proton permeability of polymer/lipid hybrids decreased after protein insertion, while the latter also led to a 20% increase of the polymer diffusion coefficient in polymersomes. In addition, PDMS- g-PEO increased the activity lifetime and the resistance to free radicals. These advantageous properties may open diverse applications, ranging from cell-free biotechnology to biomedicine. Furthermore, the presented study serves as a comprehensive road map for studying the interactions between membrane proteins and synthetic membranes, which will be fundamental for the successful engineering of such hybrid systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Liposomes and polymersomes: a comparative review towards cell mimicking

          Minimal cells: we compare and contrast liposomes and polymersomes for a better a priori choice and design of vesicles and try to understand the advantages and shortcomings associated with using one or the other in many different aspects (properties, synthesis, self-assembly, applications). Cells are integral to all forms of life due to their compartmentalization by the plasma membrane. However, living organisms are immensely complex. Thus there is a need for simplified and controllable models of life for a deeper understanding of fundamental biological processes and man-made applications. This is where the bottom-up approach of synthetic biology comes from: a stepwise assembly of biomimetic functionalities ultimately into a protocell. A fundamental feature of such an endeavor is the generation and control of model membranes such as liposomes and polymersomes. We compare and contrast liposomes and polymersomes for a better a priori choice and design of vesicles and try to understand the advantages and shortcomings associated with using one or the other in many different aspects (properties, synthesis, self-assembly, applications) and which aspects have been studied and developed with each type and update the current development in the field.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How lipids affect the activities of integral membrane proteins.

            The activities of integral membrane proteins are often affected by the structures of the lipid molecules that surround them in the membrane. One important parameter is the hydrophobic thickness of the lipid bilayer, defined by the lengths of the lipid fatty acyl chains. Membrane proteins are not rigid entities, and deform to ensure good hydrophobic matching to the surrounding lipid bilayer. The structure of the lipid headgroup region is likely to be important in defining the structures of those parts of a membrane protein that are located in the lipid headgroup region. A number of examples are given where the conformation of the headgroup-embedded region of a membrane protein changes during the reaction cycle of the protein; activities of such proteins might be expected to be particularly sensitive to lipid headgroup structure. Differences in hydrogen bonding potential and hydration between the headgroups of phosphatidycholines and phosphatidylethanolamines could be important factors in determining the effects of these lipids on protein activities, as well as any effects related to the tendency of the phosphatidylethanolamines to form a curved, hexagonal H(II) phase. Effects of lipid structure on protein aggregation and helix-helix interactions are also discussed, as well as the effects of charged lipids on ion concentrations close to the surface of the bilayer. Interpretations of lipid effects in terms of changes in protein volume, lipid free volume, and curvature frustration are also described. Finally, the role of non-annular, or 'co-factor' lipids, tightly bound to membrane proteins, is described.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Characterization of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) properties for biomedical micro/nanosystems.

              Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS Sylgard 184, Dow Corning Corporation) pre-polymer was combined with increasing amounts of cross-linker (5.7, 10.0, 14.3, 21.4, and 42.9 wt.%) and designated PDMS1, PDMS2, PDMS3, PDMS4, and PDMS5, respectively. These materials were processed by spin coating and subjected to common micro-fabrication, micro-machining, and biomedical processes: chemical immersion, oxygen plasma treatment, sterilization, and exposure to tissue culture media. The PDMS formulations were analyzed by gravimetry, goniometry, tensile testing, nano-indentation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Spin coating of PDMS was formulation dependent with film thickness ranging from 308 microm on PDMS1 to 171 microm on PDMS5 at 200 revolutions per minute (rpm). Ultimate tensile stress (UTS) increased from 3.9 MPa (PDMS1) to 10.8 MPa (PDMS3), and then decreased down to 4.0 MPa (PDMS5). Autoclave sterilization (AS) increased the storage modulus (sigma) and UTS in all formulations, with the highest increase in UTS exhibited by PDMS5 (218%). PDMS surface hydrophilicity and micro-textures were generally unaffected when exposed to the different chemicals, except for micro-texture changes after immersion in potassium hydroxide and buffered hydrofluoric, nitric, sulfuric, and hydrofluoric acids; and minimal changes in contact angle after immersion in hexane, hydrochloric acid, photoresist developer, and toluene. Oxygen plasma treatment decreased the contact angle of PDMS2 from 109 degrees to 60 degrees. Exposure to tissue culture media resulted in increased PDMS surface element concentrations of nitrogen and oxygen.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                30 June 2020
                17 June 2020
                17 June 2020
                : 117
                : 26
                : 15006-15017
                Affiliations
                [1] aProcess Systems Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems , 39106 Magdeburg, Germany;
                [2] bElectrochemical Energy Conversion, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems , 39106 Magdeburg, Germany;
                [3] cDepartment of Theory and Bio-Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces , 14424 Potsdam, Germany;
                [4] dInterdisciplinary Research Center HALOmem, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg , 06120 Halle/Saale, Germany;
                [5] eInstitute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg , 06120 Halle/Saale, Germany
                Author notes
                3To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: vidakovic@ 123456mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de or ivanov@ 123456mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de .

                Edited by Michael L. Klein, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, and approved May 14, 2020 (received for review November 5, 2019)

                Author contributions: N.M., L.O., and I.I. designed research; N.M., L.O., Z.Z., R.B.L., F.L.K., and F.H. performed research; N.M., L.O., Z.Z., R.B.L., P.L.K., T.V.-K., I.I., K.S., and R.D. analyzed data; and N.M., L.O., and I.I. wrote the paper.

                1N.M., L.O., Z.Z., and R.B.L. contributed equally to this work.

                2Present address: Moleculaire Biofysica, Zernike Instituut, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0792-5466
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5862-456X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-7312
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7362-5827
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-6289
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2155-5000
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-8422
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3896-3585
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-5287
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3251-0593
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-8502
                Article
                201919306
                10.1073/pnas.1919306117
                7334566
                32554497
                a03be652-8441-4556-a379-5d0c7c8ffe67
                Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 501100002347
                Award ID: MaxSynBio
                Award Recipient : Nika Marušič Award Recipient : Lado Otrin Award Recipient : Ziliang Zhao Award Recipient : Rafael B. Lira Award Recipient : Ivan Ivanov Award Recipient : Kai Sundmacher Award Recipient : Rumiana Dimova
                Funded by: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG) 501100004189
                Award ID: MaxSynBio
                Award Recipient : Nika Marušič Award Recipient : Lado Otrin Award Recipient : Ziliang Zhao Award Recipient : Rafael B. Lira Award Recipient : Ivan Ivanov Award Recipient : Kai Sundmacher Award Recipient : Rumiana Dimova
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 501100001659
                Award ID: 391498659
                Award Recipient : Fotis L. Kyrilis Award Recipient : Farzad Hamdi Award Recipient : Panagiotis L. Kastritis
                Categories
                Biological Sciences
                Biophysics and Computational Biology
                Physical Sciences
                Biophysics and Computational Biology

                guv,polymersome,membrane protein,proton permeability,microfluidics

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log