12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a surgical procedure performed to maintain nutrition in the short‐ or long‐term. During the procedure, a feeding tube that delivers either a liquid diet, or medication, via a clean or sterile delivery system, is placed surgically through the anterior abdominal wall. Those undergoing PEG tube placement are often vulnerable to infection because of age, compromised nutritional intake, immunosuppression, or underlying disease processes such as malignancy and diabetes mellitus. The increasing incidence of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contributes both an additional risk to the placement procedure, and to the debate surrounding antibiotic prophylaxis for PEG tube placement. The aim of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis is to establish a bactericidal concentration of an antimicrobial drug in the patient's serum and tissues, via a brief course of an appropriate agent, by the time of PEG tube placement in order to prevent any peristomal infections that might result from the procedure.

          Objectives

          To establish whether prophylactic use of systemic antimicrobials reduces the risk of peristomal infection in people undergoing placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes.

          Search methods

          In August 2013, for this third update, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) ( The Cochrane Library); Ovid Medline; Ovid Medline (In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase; and EBSCO CINAHL.

          Selection criteria

          Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of prophylactic antimicrobials during PEG tube placement, with no restrictions regarding language of publication, date of publication, or publication status. Both review authors independently selected studies.

          Data collection and analysis

          Both review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Meta‐analyses were performed where appropriate.

          Main results

          One new trial was identified and included in this update, bringing the total to 13 eligible RCTs, with a total of 1637 patients. All trials reported peristomal infection as an outcome. A pooled analysis of 12 trials resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of peristomal infection with prophylactic antibiotics (1271 patients pooled: OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.50). The newly identified trial compared IV antibiotics with antibiotics via PEG and could not be included in the meta‐analysis.

          Authors' conclusions

          Administration of systemic prophylactic antibiotics for PEG tube placement reduces peristomal infection.

          Antibiotics given before the placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube with the aim of reducing infection at the site

          Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a surgical procedure for inserting a feeding tube that goes into the stomach (through the abdomen) of patients who cannot take food by mouth. Antibiotics are often given intravenously before this surgical procedure, as a precaution to reduce the risk of infection at the site of operation. Thirteen research studies were included in this review, and they confirm that those people who were given antibiotics when their PEG tube was inserted were less likely to suffer an infection at the site than those who were not given antibiotics.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          allyson.lipp@southwales.ac.uk
          Journal
          Cochrane Database Syst Rev
          Cochrane Database Syst Rev
          14651858
          10.1002/14651858
          The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
          John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester, UK )
          1469-493X
          14 November 2013
          November 2013
          13 November 2013
          : 2013
          : 11
          : CD005571
          Affiliations
          Department of Care Sciences, University of South Wales deptFaculty of Health, Sport and Science Glyn Taff Campus Pontypridd UK CF37 1DL
          Author notes

          Editorial Group: Cochrane Wounds Group.

          Article
          PMC6823215 PMC6823215 6823215 CD005571 CD005571.pub3
          10.1002/14651858.CD005571.pub3
          6823215
          24234575
          a06ae490-d411-4032-8e66-2d35f6b49edf
          Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
          History
          : 18 October 2006
          Categories
          Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences

          Surgical Wound Infection/etiology,Anti‐Infective Agents,Risk Factors,Bacterial Infections,Bacterial Infections/prevention & control,Gastrostomy/methods,Gastrostomy,Antibiotic Prophylaxis,Surgical Wound Infection,Anti‐Infective Agents/therapeutic use,Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic,Gastrostomy/adverse effects,Humans

          Comments

          Comment on this article