5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In Vivo RNAi-Mediated eIF3m Knockdown Affects Ribosome Biogenesis and Transcription but Has Limited Impact on mRNA-Specific Translation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Translation is an essential biological process, and dysregulation is associated with a range of diseases including ribosomopathies, diabetes, and cancer. Here, we examine translation dysregulation in vivo using RNAi to knock down the m-subunit of the translation initiation factor eIF3 in the mouse liver. Transcriptome sequencing, ribosome profiling, whole proteome, and phosphoproteome analyses show that eIF3m deficiency leads to the transcriptional response and changes in cellular translation that yield few detectable differences in the translation of particular mRNAs. The transcriptional response fell into two main categories: ribosome biogenesis (increased transcription of ribosomal proteins) and cell metabolism (alterations in lipid, amino acid, nucleic acid, and drug metabolism). Analysis of ribosome biogenesis reveals inhibition of rRNA processing, highlighting decoupling of rRNA synthesis and ribosomal protein gene transcription in response to eIF3m knockdown. Interestingly, a similar reduction in eIF3m protein levels is associated with induction of the mTOR pathway in vitro but not in vivo. Overall, this work highlights the utility of a RNAi-based in vivo approach for studying the regulation of mammalian translation in vivo.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The integrated stress response.

          In response to diverse stress stimuli, eukaryotic cells activate a common adaptive pathway, termed the integrated stress response (ISR), to restore cellular homeostasis. The core event in this pathway is the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2α) by one of four members of the eIF2α kinase family, which leads to a decrease in global protein synthesis and the induction of selected genes, including the transcription factor ATF4, that together promote cellular recovery. The gene expression program activated by the ISR optimizes the cellular response to stress and is dependent on the cellular context, as well as on the nature and intensity of the stress stimuli. Although the ISR is primarily a pro-survival, homeostatic program, exposure to severe stress can drive signaling toward cell death. Here, we review current understanding of the ISR signaling and how it regulates cell fate under diverse types of stress.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Translational control by 5'-untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs.

            The eukaryotic 5' untranslated region (UTR) is critical for ribosome recruitment to the messenger RNA (mRNA) and start codon choice and plays a major role in the control of translation efficiency and shaping the cellular proteome. The ribosomal initiation complex is assembled on the mRNA via a cap-dependent or cap-independent mechanism. We describe various mechanisms controlling ribosome scanning and initiation codon selection by 5' upstream open reading frames, translation initiation factors, and primary and secondary structures of the 5'UTR, including particular sequence motifs. We also discuss translational control via phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2, which is implicated in learning and memory, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              MYC as a regulator of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis.

              MYC regulates the transcription of thousands of genes required to coordinate a range of cellular processes, including those essential for proliferation, growth, differentiation, apoptosis and self-renewal. Recently, MYC has also been shown to serve as a direct regulator of ribosome biogenesis. MYC coordinates protein synthesis through the transcriptional control of RNA and protein components of ribosomes, and of gene products required for the processing of ribosomal RNA, the nuclear export of ribosomal subunits and the initiation of mRNA translation. We discuss how the modulation of ribosome biogenesis by MYC may be essential to its physiological functions as well as its pathological role in tumorigenesis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Mol Ther Nucleic Acids
                Mol Ther Nucleic Acids
                Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
                American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
                2162-2531
                18 November 2019
                06 March 2020
                18 November 2019
                : 19
                : 252-266
                Affiliations
                [1 ]David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
                [2 ]Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [3 ]School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork, Cork T12 YN60, Ireland
                [4 ]Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Moscow, 121205, Russia
                [5 ]Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, RAS, Moscow 117997, Russia
                [6 ]Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
                [7 ]Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
                [8 ]Institute of Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
                [9 ]Department of Chemistry and Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author: Daniel G. Anderson, David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. dgander@ 123456mit.edu
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author: Victor Koteliansky, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Moscow, 121205, Russia. kotelianskiv@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S2162-2531(19)30362-2
                10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.009
                6926209
                31855834
                a075f11a-2fa1-404f-badd-d0fde56c83f6

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 3 June 2019
                : 5 November 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular medicine
                eif3,ribosome profiling,sirna,liver,in vivo,eif3m,translation,ribosomal genes,rrna,mtor
                Molecular medicine
                eif3, ribosome profiling, sirna, liver, in vivo, eif3m, translation, ribosomal genes, rrna, mtor

                Comments

                Comment on this article