22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pulmonary arterial pressure sensing in a patient with left ventricular assist device during ventricular arrhythmia

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Key Teaching Points • The care of heart failure patients is evolving to include multiple technologies as destination therapy. Familiarity with pulmonary artery pressure sensors, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, and ventricular devices is essential to providing complete care to this patient population. • Heart failure patients, including those treated with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), have a greater incidence of arrhythmias. In the future, detection of these arrhythmias may not be limited to cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. • Repeated assessment and monitoring of right ventricular function is required in patients treated with LVAD. Pulmonary artery pressure monitoring may prove to be a useful surrogate of right ventricular function. With the ever-increasing heart failure population, the use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is becoming increasingly more accepted as a treatment for heart failure as destination therapy. In 2013, this became an American Heart Association recommendation as destination therapy. 1 Despite improved mechanical function, the problem of fluid management often persists for these patients. Patients can have problems with volume overload, but in addition they are sensitive to volume and filling pressure reduction. Readmissions among patients with an LVAD remain high, with heart failure as a common indication. 2 In addition, these patients are still prone to ventricular arrhythmias (VA). 3 Patients with LVAD have a high incidence of VA and have been shown to have an improved mortality when treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). 4 Fluid management in patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure is improved when guided by pulmonary artery (PA) pressure sensor measurements. 5 There is scant data of this use in the LVAD population, but limited data suggest some utility. 6 Patients with an LVAD often have very depressed left ventricular function and blunted pulse pressure, as the left-sided cardiac output is driven by the LVAD. However, patients may still have intact right ventricular (RV) function that generates a significant pulse pressure in the pulmonary artery. Thus, ambulatory PA pressure measurements may serve as an ambulatory marker of RV function. We hypothesize that PA pressure measurements could be used as a surrogate for RV function and thus hemodynamic stability during VA. If so, could these data be utilized to enhance detection in patients with LVAD support and an ICD? Case report A 73-year-old man presented to a community hospital emergency room following a syncopal episode while trying to get out of a car. The patient has had multiple episodes of syncope or presyncope in association with recurrent symptomatic and asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT), with prior ablation both pre- and post-LVAD. His history is complicated with nonischemic cardiomyopathy first diagnosed in 2002, and history of a biventricular ICD (Guidant Corporation, St. Paul, MN, and Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA), originally placed in 2002, and most recently replaced in January 2016. His heart failure continued to progress, requiring LVAD support as destination therapy with placement of a HeartMate II (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) in 2012. Following placement of his device, the patient had multiple episodes of VT. This was initially treated medically, and then first ablated in 2014. He was again hospitalized twice in 2015 due to recurrent VT with associated ICD shocks. The VT proved to be refractory to medical therapy. He underwent 2 subsequent ablations for VT in October 2015 and January 2016, though he remained inducible for very fast VA (rates > 220 beats per minute [bpm]). Due to multiple episodes of sustained asymptomatic VT (rate 210 bpm) that was refractory to both antitachycardia pacing and shock therapy (VF 220 / VT 200 / VT1 140), all therapies were disabled to “monitor only” mode. With each hospitalization for VT, he was found to be fluid overloaded with a pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ranging from 20 to 26. A PA pressure sensor (CardioMEMS; St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) was placed in January 2016 to aid in fluid management. The patient was maintained on oral amiodarone 200 mg twice daily. Following placement of the PA pressure sensor, the patient was clinically stable and without hospitalization for 2 months. However, in March 2016 the patient suffered a witnessed syncopal event. Upon arrival to the emergency room, he was found to have a heart rate of approximately 210 bpm. Electrocardiogram revealed a wide complex tachycardia. A chest radiograph revealing his hardware, including the PA sensor, is shown in Figure 1. Device interrogation showed programmed DDDR pacing with RV-only pacing with clear VT that subsequently accelerated with continued A-V sequential pacing and brief classification in VT-1 zone, demonstrating undersensing. At the time of the most recent episode, sensitivity was noted at 0.15 mV, with recent chest radiograph confirming no evidence of lead displacement in chronic RV apex lead. Figure 1 Chest radiograph revealing implanted devices, including pulmonary artery (PA) pressure sensor and chronic high-voltage lead. LV = left ventricle; LVAD = left ventricular assist device. At the time of transfer to our tertiary care center, the patient appeared minimally symptomatic while at bedrest and clinically stable with adequate support from the LVAD, with a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg (systolic blood pressure). The patient was on intravenous lidocaine. On electrocardiogram the patient was seen to be in rapid VA, with initial bedside interrogation of the patient’s PA pressures revealing only minimal and fast irregular pressure waveform with a mean of 22 mm Hg (Figure 2). Figure 2 A: Twelve-lead electrocardiogram revealing wide complex tachycardia at the time of patient presentation to the emergency room following an episode of witnessed syncope. B: Initial interrogation of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) sensor showing only minimal and fast irregular pressure waveform with a mean of 22 mm Hg. Given that the syncope was presumed to be secondary to loss of RV function, the patient was cardioverted to an A-V sequential biventricular-paced rhythm. Immediately after cardioversion, there was a return of normal waveforms on PA pressure recordings despite low signal strength, with a PA pressure of approximately 40/20 mm Hg (Figure 3). Blood pressure immediately improved to 100/80 mm Hg. The measurements recorded were not acute onset. In both retrospective (pulsatile devices) and prospective (continuous flow devices) studies, the LVAD patient population from ICD. 7 We speculate that VT in this population may cause an abrupt change in hemodynamic filling pressures to explain syncope but may eventually normalize with time. This may provide an explanation why the ICD is associated with improved outcomes in the post–ventricular assist device population. Figure 3 A: Electrocardiogram demonstrating an A-V sequential biventricular-paced rhythm post cardioversion. B: Postcardioversion interrogation of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) sensor revealing normal pulmonary artery waveform. With aggressive heart failure management, the patient has remained in sinus rhythm with only rare ventricular arrhythmias. The patient continues to have stable monitoring of PA pressures and has required occasional changes in diuretic therapy guided by sensor readings. He has not been hospitalized for the last 6 months. Discussion This case illustrates how physiologic PA pressure waveform as a marker of RV function could potentially be used to aid in determination of hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia present in the presence of an ICD in a patient with an LVAD. Inappropriate shocks continue to be a significant problem, related to supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, or inappropriate noise/artifact detection. Despite improvements in device detection algorithms and programming insights, ICD detection of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias still may fail in current systems. 8 For the electrophysiologist, failure to detect a life-threatening arrhythmia is devastating, but one should not discount the negative consequences of inappropriate therapy, including mortality. 9 Reductions in inappropriate therapy with contemporary programming have been demonstrated to reduce mortality. 8 Patients with an LVAD have varying degrees of preload sensitivity. 10 The mechanism of symptoms of syncope in this patient was presumably a reduction in preload during VA. Hemodynamic monitoring with a PA pressure sensor has the potential to differentiate between a hemodynamically stable and unstable arrhythmia, even in the patient with an LVAD. As preload sensitivity varies in each patient, not all VA may result in hemodynamic instability. Thus, it may be more appropriate to rely on hemodynamic parameters in this population. One might envision algorithms in the LVAD population that allow for defibrillation only if there are hemodynamic consequences. Hemodynamic parameters have been demonstrated previously to predict VA in patients with advanced heart failure, 11 and hemodynamic sensors have been incorporated into ICD systems.12, 13 Recently, the CardioMEMS PA sensor readings have been incorporated into the same remote monitoring system as cardiac rhythm management devices (Merlin.net; St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA). Although this facilitates device and sensor ambulatory follow-up, it does not involve direct device–sensor communication. Patients with an LVAD may often tolerate VA for days before clinical deterioration, again presumably from loss of RV function. Thus, there could be easily programmable features that allow for the patient to withhold therapy until transmission of real-time hemodynamic assessment with the PA pressure. This concept of patient-driven withholding of therapy is currently used with the LifeVest wearable defibrillator. 14 The CardioMEMS sensor contains a coil and capacitor that form a miniature electrical circuit sensitive to shifts in acoustic frequency. 15 The device coil allows for coupling to the sensor by an external antenna, measuring its resonant frequency, and converts the frequency shifts in a real-time pressure waveform. As modern ICDs communicate via radiofrequency, one could speculate that this could be incorporated into a cardiovascular implantable electronic device such as an ICD and allow for interaction between the sensor and the ICD, and then be incorporated into detection algorithms. Whether or not this is possible remains to be seen. Conclusion This clinical case demonstrates an association between the change in PA pressure waveform, indicating loss of RV function, and occurrence of symptomatic VA in a patient implanted with an LVAD. This technology has many potential applications, but if this technology could be linked with ICD therapy it would create an opportunity to differentiate between hemodynamically stable and unstable arrhythmias.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial.

          Results of previous studies support the hypothesis that implantable haemodynamic monitoring systems might reduce rates of hospitalisation in patients with heart failure. We undertook a single-blind trial to assess this approach. Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III heart failure, irrespective of the left ventricular ejection fraction, and a previous hospital admission for heart failure were enrolled in 64 centres in the USA. They were randomly assigned by use of a centralised electronic system to management with a wireless implantable haemodynamic monitoring (W-IHM) system (treatment group) or to a control group for at least 6 months. Only patients were masked to their assignment group. In the treatment group, clinicians used daily measurement of pulmonary artery pressures in addition to standard of care versus standard of care alone in the control group. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of heart-failure-related hospitalisations at 6 months. The safety endpoints assessed at 6 months were freedom from device-related or system-related complications (DSRC) and freedom from pressure-sensor failures. All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00531661. In 6 months, 83 heart-failure-related hospitalisations were reported in the treatment group (n=270) compared with 120 in the control group (n=280; rate 0·31 vs 0·44, hazard ratio [HR] 0·70, 95% CI 0·60-0·84, p<0·0001). During the entire follow-up (mean 15 months [SD 7]), the treatment group had a 39% reduction in heart-failure-related hospitalisation compared with the control group (153 vs 253, HR 0·64, 95% CI 0·55-0·75; p<0·0001). Eight patients had DSRC and overall freedom from DSRC was 98·6% (97·3-99·4) compared with a prespecified performance criterion of 80% (p<0·0001); and overall freedom from pressure-sensor failures was 100% (99·3-100·0). Our results are consistent with, and extend, previous findings by definitively showing a significant and large reduction in hospitalisation for patients with NYHA class III heart failure who were managed with a wireless implantable haemodynamic monitoring system. The addition of information about pulmonary artery pressure to clinical signs and symptoms allows for improved heart failure management. CardioMEMS. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intrathoracic impedance monitoring, audible patient alerts, and outcome in patients with heart failure.

            Heart failure is associated with frequent hospitalizations, often resulting from volume overload. Measurement of intrathoracic impedance with an implanted device with an audible patient alert may detect increases in pulmonary fluid retention early. We hypothesized that early intervention could prevent hospitalizations and affect outcome. We studied 335 patients with chronic heart failure who had undergone implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator alone (18%) or with cardiac resynchronization therapy (82%). All devices featured a monitoring tool to track changes in intrathoracic impedance (OptiVol) and other diagnostic parameters. Patients were randomized to have information available to physicians and patients as an audible alert in case of preset threshold crossings (access arm) or not (control arm). The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations. During 14.9±5.4 months, this occurred in 48 patients (29%) in the access arm and in 33 patients (20%) in the control arm (P=0.063; hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.37). This was due mainly to more heart failure hospitalizations (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.95; P=0.022), whereas the number of deaths was comparable (19 versus 15; P=0.54). The number of outpatient visits was higher in the access arm (250 versus 84; P<0.0001), with relatively more signs of heart failure among control patients during outpatient visits. Although the trial was terminated as a result of slow enrollment, a post hoc futility analysis indicated that a positive result would have been unlikely. Use of an implantable diagnostic tool to measure intrathoracic impedance with an audible patient alert did not improve outcome and increased heart failure hospitalizations and outpatient visits in heart failure patients. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT 00480077.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Physician-directed patient self-management of left atrial pressure in advanced chronic heart failure.

              Previous studies suggest that management of ambulatory hemodynamics may improve outcomes in chronic heart failure. We conducted a prospective, observational, first-in-human study of a physician-directed patient self-management system targeting left atrial pressure. Forty patients with reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and a history of New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure and acute decompensation were implanted with an investigational left atrial pressure monitor, and readings were acquired twice daily. For the first 3 months, patients and clinicians were blinded as to these readings, and treatment continued per usual clinical assessment. Thereafter, left atrial pressure and individualized therapy instructions guided by these pressures were disclosed to the patient. Event-free survival was determined over a median follow-up of 25 months (range 3 to 38 months). Survival without decompensation was 61% at 3 years, and events tended to be less frequent after the first 3 months (hazard ratio 0.16 [95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.68], P=0.012). Mean daily left atrial pressure fell from 17.6 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 15.8 to 19.4 mm Hg) in the first 3 months to 14.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 13.0 to 16.6 mm Hg; P=0.003) during pressure-guided therapy. The frequency of elevated readings (>25 mm Hg) was reduced by 67% (P<0.001). There were improvements in New York Heart Association class (-0.7+/-0.8, P<0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (7+/-10%, P<0.001). Doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin-receptor blockers and beta-blockers were uptitrated by 37% (P<0.001) and 40% (P<0.001), respectively, whereas doses of loop diuretics fell by 27% (P=0.15). Physician-directed patient self-management of left atrial pressure has the potential to improve hemodynamics, symptoms, and outcomes in advanced heart failure. Clinical Trial Registration Information- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00547729.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                HeartRhythm Case Rep
                HeartRhythm Case Rep
                HeartRhythm Case Reports
                Elsevier
                2214-0271
                17 May 2017
                July 2017
                17 May 2017
                : 3
                : 7
                : 348-351
                Affiliations
                [1]Division of Cardiology EP Section, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
                Author notes
                [] Address reprint requests and correspondence: Dr Rahul N. Doshi, MD, FHRS, Division of Cardiology EP Section, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, 1510 San Pablo Ave, Suite 322, Los Angeles, CA 90033.Division of Cardiology EP SectionUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine1510 San Pablo AveSuite 322Los AngelesCA90033 Rahul.doshi@ 123456med.usc.edu
                Article
                S2214-0271(17)30085-4
                10.1016/j.hrcr.2017.05.002
                5511983
                a095382a-067b-40b1-8c78-a4f8b52ecc53
                © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Case Report

                pulmonary artery pressure,sensor,ventricular arrhythmia,lvad,defibrillator,heart failure

                Comments

                Comment on this article