32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Understanding the Role of Racism in Contemporary US Public Opinion

      1
      Annual Review of Political Science
      Annual Reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the contemporary context, it is inescapable that racism is a factor in US public opinion. When scholars take stock of the way we typically measure and conceptualize racism, we find reason to reconceptualize the racial resentment scale as a measure of perceptions of the reasons for political inequality. We also see reason to move beyond thinking of racism as an attitude, toward conceptualizing it as a perspective. In addition, we see reason to pay closer attention to the role of elites in creating and perpetuating a role for racism in the way people think about public affairs. The study of racism is evolving in parallel with the broader public discussion: toward a recognition of the complex and fundamental ways it is woven into US culture and political life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer's Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement.

              Misattributions people make about their own affective reactions can be used to measure attitudes implicitly. Combining the logic of projective tests with advances in priming research, the affect misattribution procedure (AMP) was sensitive to normatively favorable and unfavorable evaluations (Experiments 1-4), and the misattribution effect was strong at both fast and slow presentation rates (Experiments 3 and 4). Providing further evidence of validity, the AMP was strongly related to individual differences in self-reported political attitudes and voting intentions (Experiment 5). In the socially sensitive domain of racial attitudes, the AMP showed in-group bias for Black and White participants. AMP performance correlated with explicit racial attitudes, a relationship that was moderated by motivations to control prejudice (Experiment 6). Across studies, the task was unaffected by direct warnings to avoid bias. Advantages of the AMP include large effect sizes, high reliability, ease of use, and resistance to correction attempts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annual Review of Political Science
                Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci.
                Annual Reviews
                1094-2939
                1545-1577
                May 11 2020
                May 11 2020
                : 23
                : 1
                : 153-169
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA;
                Article
                10.1146/annurev-polisci-060418-042842
                a0a3b5f6-2dee-452b-8bb5-877d4498e756
                © 2020

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Social policy & Welfare,Political science,Psychology,Law
                Social policy & Welfare, Political science, Psychology, Law

                Comments

                Comment on this article