135
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Human pressures on the environment are changing spatially and temporally, with profound implications for the planet's biodiversity and human economies. Here we use recently available data on infrastructure, land cover and human access into natural areas to construct a globally standardized measure of the cumulative human footprint on the terrestrial environment at 1 km 2 resolution from 1993 to 2009. We note that while the human population has increased by 23% and the world economy has grown 153%, the human footprint has increased by just 9%. Still, 75% the planet's land surface is experiencing measurable human pressures. Moreover, pressures are perversely intense, widespread and rapidly intensifying in places with high biodiversity. Encouragingly, we discover decreases in environmental pressures in the wealthiest countries and those with strong control of corruption. Clearly the human footprint on Earth is changing, yet there are still opportunities for conservation gains.

          Abstract

          Habitat loss and urbanization are primary components of human impact on the environment. Here, Venter et al. use global data on infrastructure, agriculture, and urbanization to show that the human footprint is growing slower than the human population, but footprints are increasing in biodiverse regions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out

            W. Rees (1992)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers.

              Urbanization contributes to the loss of the world's biodiversity and the homogenization of its biota. However, comparative studies of urban biodiversity leading to robust generalities of the status and drivers of biodiversity in cities at the global scale are lacking. Here, we compiled the largest global dataset to date of two diverse taxa in cities: birds (54 cities) and plants (110 cities). We found that the majority of urban bird and plant species are native in the world's cities. Few plants and birds are cosmopolitan, the most common being Columba livia and Poa annua. The density of bird and plant species (the number of species per km(2)) has declined substantially: only 8% of native bird and 25% of native plant species are currently present compared with estimates of non-urban density of species. The current density of species in cities and the loss in density of species was best explained by anthropogenic features (landcover, city age) rather than by non-anthropogenic factors (geography, climate, topography). As urbanization continues to expand, efforts directed towards the conservation of intact vegetation within urban landscapes could support higher concentrations of both bird and plant species. Despite declines in the density of species, cities still retain endemic native species, thus providing opportunities for regional and global biodiversity conservation, restoration and education.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group
                2041-1723
                23 August 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 12558
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Ecosystem Science and Management Program, University of Northern British Columbia , Prince George, British Columbia, Canada V2N 4Z9
                [2 ]Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland , St Lucia Queensland 4072, Australia
                [3 ]Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University , Cairns, Queensland 4878, Australia
                [4 ]Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program , Bronx New York 10460, USA
                [5 ]Ecosystem Management, ETH Zurich , 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
                [6 ]Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Avd. Américo Vespucio s/n, Isla de la Cartuja , 41092 Sevilla, Spain
                [7 ]School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland , St Lucia Queensland 4072, Australia
                [8 ]Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London , Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
                [9 ]Department of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY Environmental CrossRoads Initiative, City University of New York , New York, New York 10007, USA
                [10 ]Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University , Palisades, New York 10964, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                ncomms12558
                10.1038/ncomms12558
                4996975
                27552116
                a0c1766d-8a3b-4420-bb31-1efcc39f94b3
                Copyright © 2016, The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 24 November 2015
                : 13 July 2016
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article