15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Self-efficacy and health-related quality of life in family carers of people with dementia: a systematic review

      other

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: This review aims to explore the role of self-efficacy (SE) in the health-related quality of life (QoL) of family carers of people with dementia.

          Methods: A systematic review of literature identified a range of qualitative and quantitative studies. Search terms related to caring, SE, and dementia. Narrative synthesis was adopted to synthesise the findings.

          Results: Twenty-two studies met the full inclusion criteria, these included 17 quantitative, four qualitative, and one mixed-method study. A model describing the role of task/domain-specific SE beliefs in family carer health-related QoL was constructed. This model was informed by review findings and discussed in the context of existing conceptual models of carer adaptation and empirical research. Review findings offer support for the application of the SE theory to caring and for the two-factor view of carer appraisals and well-being. Findings do not support the independence of the negative and positive pathways. The review was valuable in highlighting methodological challenges confronting this area of research, particularly the conceptualisation and measurement issues surrounding both SE and health-related QoL.

          Conclusions: The model might have theoretical implications in guiding future research and advancing theoretical models of caring. It might also have clinical implications in facilitating the development of carer support services aimed at improving SE. The review highlights the need for future research, particularly longitudinal research, and further exploration of domain/task-specific SE beliefs, the influence of carer characteristics, and other mediating/moderating variables.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

          In this article, we attempt to distinguish between the properties of moderator and mediator variables at a number of levels. First, we seek to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating, both conceptually and strategically, the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ. We then go beyond this largely pedagogical function and delineate the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena, including control and stress, attitudes, and personality traits. We also provide a specific compendium of analytic procedures appropriate for making the most effective use of the moderator and mediator distinction, both separately and in terms of a broader causal system that includes both moderators and mediators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A power primer.

            One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Aging Ment Health
                Aging Ment Health
                CAMH
                camh20
                Aging & Mental Health
                Routledge
                1360-7863
                1364-6915
                17 November 2014
                19 June 2014
                : 18
                : 8
                : 954-969
                Affiliations
                [ a ]Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London , London, UK
                [ b ]Research and Development Department, North East London NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
                [ c ]Doctoral Programme in Music Therapy, Aalborg University , Aalborg, Denmark
                [ d ]Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London , London, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Email: n.crellin@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                915921
                10.1080/13607863.2014.915921
                4192898
                24943873
                a0ddf075-79c5-4caf-8d21-1c375cd9dbac
                © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis.

                This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

                History
                : 18 November 2013
                : 14 April 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, References: 71, Pages: 16
                Funding
                This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme [grant number RP-PG 0606-1083]. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
                Categories
                Reviews

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                caregivers,self-efficacy,quality of life,systematic review,narrative synthesis

                Comments

                Comment on this article