16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Can Neuroscience Provide a New Foundation for the Rorschach Variables?

      research-article
      1 , * , , 2 , 3
      Rorschachiana
      Hogrefe Publishing
      brain, cognition, emotion, functional MRI, individual differences

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Recent progress in neuroscience has made it possible to use neurophysiological techniques to validate and deepen the interpretation of Rorschach variables. The aim of this article is to review the results from Rorschach studies using the neurophysiological approach to discuss the consistencies and inconsistencies between the different results, and then to consider the future direction of Rorschach research in this area. We also provide unpublished data to complement the picture from peer-reviewed studies. Two main approaches to neuropsychological studies on the Rorschach exist. One approach is to measure brain activities directly during the Rorschach administration; a series of studies using multiple neurophysiological methods revealed activation of the mirror neuron system with relation to human movement responses. Another possible approach is to investigate whether individual differences in Rorschach scores can be explained by neurophysiological measurements during the administration of another psychological task. This article reviews how these two approaches provide novel insights into the Rorschach Test.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system.

          We systematically evaluated the peer-reviewed Rorschach validity literature for the 65 main variables in the popular Comprehensive System (CS). Across 53 meta-analyses examining variables against externally assessed criteria (e.g., observer ratings, psychiatric diagnosis), the mean validity was r = .27 (k = 770) as compared to r = .08 (k = 386) across 42 meta-analyses examining variables against introspectively assessed criteria (e.g., self-report). Using Hemphill's (2003) data-driven guidelines for interpreting the magnitude of assessment effect sizes with only externally assessed criteria, we found 13 variables had excellent support (r ≥ .33, p 50), 17 had good support (r ≥ .21, p .05), and 12 had no construct-relevant validity studies. The variables with the strongest support were largely those that assess cognitive and perceptual processes (e.g., Perceptual-Thinking Index, Synthesized Response); those with the least support tended to be very rare (e.g., Color Projection) or some of the more recently developed scales (e.g., Egocentricity Index, Isolation Index). Our findings are less positive, more nuanced, and more inclusive than those reported in the CS test manual. We discuss study limitations and the implications for research and clinical practice, including the importance of using different methods in order to improve our understanding of people.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Differences in Brain Hemodynamics in Response to Achromatic and Chromatic Cards of the Rorschach

            Abstract. In order to investigate the effects of color stimuli of the Rorschach inkblot method (RIM), the cerebral activity of 40 participants with no history of neurological or psychiatric illness was scanned while they engaged in the Rorschach task. A scanned image of the ten RIM inkblots was projected onto a screen in the MRI scanner. Cerebral activation in response to five achromatic color cards and five chromatic cards were compared. As a result, a significant increase in brain activity was observed in bilateral visual areas V2 and V3, parietooccipital junctions, pulvinars, right superior temporal gyrus, and left premotor cortex for achromatic color cards (p < .001). For the cards with chromatic color, significant increase in brain activity was observed in left visual area V4 and left orbitofrontal cortex (p < .001). Furthermore, a conjoint analysis revealed various regions were activated in responding to the RIM. The neuropsychological underpinnings of the response process, as described by Acklin and Wu-Holt (1996), were largely confirmed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The shading responses

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                ror
                Rorschachiana
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1192-5604
                2151-206X
                September 15, 2021
                : 42
                : 2 , Special Issue: The Rorschach Test Today: An Update on the Research
                : 143-165
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan
                [ 2 ]Madhyama Mental Clinic, Kawasaki, Japan
                [ 3 ]Nakamura Psychotherapy Institute, Tokyo, Japan
                Author notes
                Koji Jimura, Department of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, 223-0061, Japan, E-mail jimura@ 123456bio.keio.ac.jp
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1991-3371
                Article
                ror_42_2_143
                10.1027/1192-5604/a000147
                a0e281cc-e605-45e9-817e-d1f6e30f0728
                Copyright @ 2021
                History
                : February 9, 2021
                : March 29, 2021
                : April 10, 2021
                Categories
                Research Article

                Psychology,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                individual differences,functional MRI,emotion,cognition,brain

                Comments

                Comment on this article