21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reversible Immobilization of Lipases on Heterofunctional Octyl-Amino Agarose Beads Prevents Enzyme Desorption

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two different heterofunctional octyl-amino supports have been prepared using ethylenediamine and hexylendiamine (OCEDA and OCHDA) and utilized to immobilize five lipases (lipases A (CALA) and B (CALB) from Candida antarctica, lipases from Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL), from Rhizomucor miehei (RML) and from Candida rugosa (CRL) and the phospholipase Lecitase Ultra (LU). Using pH 5 and 50 mM sodium acetate, the immobilizations proceeded via interfacial activation on the octyl layer, after some ionic bridges were established. These supports did not release enzyme when incubated at Triton X-100 concentrations that released all enzyme molecules from the octyl support. The octyl support produced significant enzyme hyperactivation, except for CALB. However, the activities of the immobilized enzymes were usually slightly higher using the new supports than the octyl ones. Thermal and solvent stabilities of LU and TLL were significantly improved compared to the OC counterparts, while in the other enzymes the stability decreased in most cases (depending on the pH value). As a general rule, OCEDA had lower negative effects on the stability of the immobilized enzymes than OCHDA and while in solvent inactivation the enzyme molecules remained attached to the support using the new supports and were released using monofunctional octyl supports, in thermal inactivations this only occurred in certain cases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization.

          Immobilization of enzymes may produce alterations in their observed activity, specificity or selectivity. Although in many cases an impoverishment of the enzyme properties is observed upon immobilization (caused by the distortion of the enzyme due to the interaction with the support) in some instances such properties may be enhanced by this immobilization. These alterations in enzyme properties are sometimes associated with changes in the enzyme structure. Occasionally, these variations will be positive. For example, they may be related to the stabilization of a hyperactivated form of the enzyme, like in the case of lipases immobilized on hydrophobic supports via interfacial activation. In some other instances, these improvements will be just a consequence of random modifications in the enzyme properties that in some reactions will be positive while in others may be negative. For this reason, the preparation of a library of biocatalysts as broad as possible may be a key turning point to find an immobilized biocatalyst with improved properties when compared to the free enzyme. Immobilized enzymes will be dispersed on the support surface and aggregation will no longer be possible, while the free enzyme may suffer aggregation, which greatly decreases enzyme activity. Moreover, enzyme rigidification may lead to preservation of the enzyme properties under drastic conditions in which the enzyme tends to become distorted thus decreasing its activity. Furthermore, immobilization of enzymes on a support, mainly on a porous support, may in many cases also have a positive impact on the observed enzyme behavior, not really related to structural changes. For example, the promotion of diffusional problems (e.g., pH gradients, substrate or product gradients), partition (towards or away from the enzyme environment, for substrate or products), or the blocking of some areas (e.g., reducing inhibitions) may greatly improve enzyme performance. Thus, in this tutorial review, we will try to list and explain some of the main reasons that may produce an improvement in enzyme activity, specificity or selectivity, either real or apparent, due to immobilization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Potential of Different Enzyme Immobilization Strategies to Improve Enzyme Performance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Industrial use of immobilized enzymes.

              Although many methods for enzyme immobilization have been described in patents and publications, relatively few processes employing immobilized enzymes have been successfully commercialized. The cost of most industrial enzymes is often only a minor component in overall process economics, and in these instances, the additional costs associated with enzyme immobilization are often not justified. More commonly the benefit realized from enzyme immobilization relates to the process advantages that an immobilized catalyst offers, for example, enabling continuous production, improved stability and the absence of the biocatalyst in the product stream. The development and attributes of several established and emerging industrial applications for immobilized enzymes, including high-fructose corn syrup production, pectin hydrolysis, debittering of fruit juices, interesterification of food fats and oils, biodiesel production, and carbon dioxide capture are reviewed herein, highlighting factors that define the advantages of enzyme immobilization.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Molecules
                Molecules
                molecules
                Molecules
                MDPI
                1420-3049
                16 May 2016
                May 2016
                : 21
                : 5
                : 646
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departamento de Biocatalisis, Instituto de Catálisis-CSIC; C/ Marie Curie 2, Campus UAM-CSIC, Madrid 28049, Spain; nazzoly@ 123456gmail.com (N.R.); tiagotla1@ 123456gmail.com (T.L.A.); rociobartolomecabrero2010@ 123456gmail.com (R.B.-C.); laura_valde95@ 123456hotmail.com (L.F.-L.); jscleiton@ 123456gmail.com (J.C.S.d.S.)
                [2 ]Escuela de Química, Grupo de investigación en Bioquímica y Microbiología (GIBIM), Edificio Camilo Torres 210, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia; rodrigo.torres@ 123456ecopetrol.com.co
                [3 ]Departamento de Engenharia Química, Universidade Federal Do Ceará, Campus Do Pici, CEP 60455-760 Fortaleza, Brazil
                [4 ]Escuela de Microbiología, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia; ortizc@ 123456uis.edu.co
                [5 ]Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Tolima, Ibagué 546, Colombia; oveimar@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence: rfl@ 123456icp.csic.es ; Tel.: +34-9158-54941
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [‡]

                Current address: Laboratorio de Biotecnología, Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo-Ecopetrol, Piedecuesta, Bucaramanga 680012, Colombia.

                Article
                molecules-21-00646
                10.3390/molecules21050646
                6273131
                27196882
                a10c7391-94ba-41be-96b0-e1cd4f0f6214
                © 2016 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 March 2016
                : 09 May 2016
                Categories
                Article

                heterofunctional supports,octyl supports,interfacial activation of lipases,ion exchange,enzyme hyperactivation,reversible immobilization

                Comments

                Comment on this article