30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cell Death or Survival Promoted by Alternative Isoforms of ErbB4

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The report demonstrates that two distinct isoforms of the ErbB4 receptor tyrosine kinase stimulate either proliferation or apoptosis by mechanisms involving differential transcriptional regulation of the PDGFRA gene. These data have implications for developing approaches to target ErbB4 signaling in cancer.

          Abstract

          The significance of ErbB4 in tumor biology is poorly understood. The ERBB4 gene is alternatively spliced producing juxtamembrane (JM-a and JM-b) and cytoplasmic (CYT-1 and CYT-2) isoforms. Here, signaling via the two alternative ErbB4 JM isoforms (JM-a CYT-2 and JM-b CYT-2) was compared. Fibroblasts expressing ErbB4 JM-a demonstrated enhanced ErbB4 autophosphorylation, growth, and survival. In contrast, cells overexpressing ErbB4 JM-b underwent starvation-induced death. Both pro- and antisurvival responses to the two ErbB4 isoforms were sensitive to an ErbB kinase inhibitor. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha ( PDGFRA) was identified as an ErbB4 target gene that was differentially regulated by the two ErbB4 isoforms. The soluble intracellular domain of ErbB4, released from the JM-a but not from the JM-b isoform, associated with the transcription factor AP-2 and promoted its potential to enhance PDGFRA transcription. Survival of cells expressing JM-a was suppressed by targeting either PDGFR-α or AP-2, whereas cells expressing JM-b were rescued from cell death by the PDGFR-α agonist, PDGF-BB. These findings indicate that two alternative ErbB4 isoforms may promote antagonistic cellular responses and suggest that pharmacological inhibition of ErbB4 kinase activity may lead to either suppression or promotion of cellular growth.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation.

          C Marshall (1995)
          A number of different intracellular signaling pathways have been shown to be activated by receptor tyrosine kinases. These activation events include the phosphoinositide 3-kinase, 70 kDa S6 kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phospholipase C-gamma, and the Jak/STAT pathways. The precise role of each of these pathways in cell signaling remains to be resolved, but studies on the differentiation of mammalian PC12 cells in tissue culture and the genetics of cell fate determination in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis suggest that the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK-regulated) MAPK pathway may be sufficient for these cellular responses. Experiments with PC12 cells also suggest that the duration of ERK activation is critical for cell signaling decisions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ErbB receptors and signaling pathways in cancer.

            The ErbB receptor tyrosine kinases play important roles in normal physiology and in cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and ErbB2 in particular are mutated in many epithelial tumors, and clinical studies suggest that they play roles in cancer development and progression. These receptors have been intensely studied, not only to understand the mechanisms underlying their oncogenic potential, but also to exploit them as therapeutic targets. ErbB receptors activate a multiplicity of intracellular pathways via their ability to interact with numerous signal transducers. Furthermore, there are now many ErbB-targeted inhibitors used in the clinic. In this review we will concentrate on breast tumors with ERBB2 gene amplification/receptor overexpression and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations. We will discuss data showing the important role that the PI3K/Akt pathway plays, not only in cancer development, but also in response to targeted therapies. Finally, mechanisms contributing to resistance to ErbB-targeted therapeutics will also be discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              gamma -Secretase cleavage and nuclear localization of ErbB-4 receptor tyrosine kinase.

              ErbB-4 is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase that regulates cell proliferation and differentiation. After binding of its ligand heregulin (HRG) or activation of protein kinase C (PKC) by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), the ErbB-4 ectodomain is cleaved by a metalloprotease. We now report a subsequent cleavage by gamma-secretase that releases the ErbB-4 intracellular domain from the membrane and facilitates its translocation to the nucleus. gamma-Secretase cleavage was prevented by chemical inhibitors or a dominant negative presenilin. Inhibition of gamma-secretase also prevented growth inhibition by HRG. gamma-Secretase cleavage of ErbB-4 may represent another mechanism for receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated signaling.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Monitoring Editor
                Journal
                Mol Biol Cell
                mbc
                mbc
                Mol. Bio. Cell
                Molecular Biology of the Cell
                The American Society for Cell Biology
                1059-1524
                1939-4586
                1 December 2010
                : 21
                : 23
                : 4275-4286
                Affiliations
                [1]*Department of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, and Medicity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland;
                [2] Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland;
                [3] §Turku Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland;
                [4] The Lautenberg Center for Immunology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, 91120 Jerusalem, Israel; and
                [5] Department of Cell Biology, University of Nijmegen, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Dr. Klaus Elenius ( klaus.elenius@ 123456utu.fi ).

                 These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                3649486
                10.1091/mbc.E10-04-0332
                2993754
                20943952
                a156bce5-d189-4423-ae26-b6738fc43239
                © 2010 by The American Society for Cell Biology

                This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).

                History
                : 21 April 2010
                : 30 September 2010
                : 30 September 2010
                Categories
                Articles
                Signaling

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article