There is no real-world data in clinical practice for multiple myeloma in Lebanon
Despite novel therapies, high dose chemotherapy regimens are still used in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Autologous stem cell transplant improves progression free survival and still a valid option for transplant fit patient despite novel therapeutic novel agents
OS and PFS were not affected by type of regimen
Hypercalcemia was significantly associated with a shorter mean PFS and OS upon presentation
Because most of the time real-world data patients will not meet eligibility criteria for clinical trials such as age and performance status, effort should be multiplied towards developing a Lebanese cancer data base (e.g clinical characteristics, survival outcomes of treatment, statistics…).
The present retrospective multicenter study aims at documenting characteristics of multiple myeloma (MM) patients and the effect of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) on survival.
A total of 134 adult patients initiating any new MM therapy from January 2002 till December 2019 were included. Enrollment was stratified by disease subtype, induction protocol and transplant status. The characteristics and survival outcomes were recorded.
Mean age at diagnosis was 61.91 ± 10.83 years, with 62.7% male patients. Regarding the prognostic MM International Staging System (ISS), stage 3 was the most common at diagnosis with 50.8% of patients followed by stage 1 (25.4%) and stage 2 (23.8%). Maintenance treatment was given in 88.5% of the patients. 24.6% patients were transplanted, 41% were not and the remaining were unknown or still in induction. 86.1% of patients were alive at data cut off. A significantly higher mean progression free survival (PFS) was found in transplant patients (p=0.016). Using cox regression, creatinine >2 mg/dl (HR3.78) and hypercalcemia >11 mg/dl (HR=6.48) were significantly associated with a shorter PFS1. A significantly shorter overall survival (OS) was associated with hypercalcemia (HR=6.58), as well as male gender though not statistically significant in the latter. Difference in survival distributions by treatment was not statistically significant (bortezomib thalidomide dexamethasone (VTD) (p=0.211), bortezomib cyclophosphamide dexamethasone (VCD) (p=0.111) or bortezomib Revlimid dexamethasone (VRD) (p=0.312)). The interaction between ISS stage on diagnosis and transplant was not significantly associated with the overall survival.