10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of brief cognitive screening (BCS) tools designed to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in Spanish-speaking individuals over the age of 50 years from Latin America (LA).

          Methods: A systematic search of titles and abstracts in Medline, Biomed Central, Embase, Scopus, Scirus, PsycINFO, LILACS, and SciELO was conducted. Inclusion criteria were papers written in English or Spanish involving samples from Spanish-speaking Latin American individuals published until 2018. Standard procedures were applied for reviewing the literature. The data related to the study sample, methodology, and procedures applied, as well as the performance obtained with the corresponding BCS, were collected and systematized.

          Results: Thirteen of 211 articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies primarily involved memory clinic-based samples, with the exception of two studies from an adult day-care center, one from a primary care clinic, and one from a community-based sample. All the studies originated from five of the 20 countries of LA and all used standardized diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of dementia and MCI; however, the diagnostic protocols applied differed. Most studies reported samples with an average of 10 years of education and only one reported a sample with an average of <5 years of education. No publication to date has included an illiterate population. Although the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) is the most widely-used BCS tool in LA, it is significantly influenced by education level.

          Conclusions: Although evidence is still limited, the findings from studies on LA populations suggest that MoCA requires cultural adaptations and different cutoff points according to education level. Moreover, the diagnostic validity of the INECO frontal screening (IFS) test should be evaluated in populations with a low level of education. Given the heterogeneity that exists in the levels of education in LA, more studies involving illiterate and indigenous populations are required.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

            Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Dementia prevention, intervention, and care

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Aging Neurosci
                Front Aging Neurosci
                Front. Aging Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-4365
                04 September 2020
                2020
                : 12
                : 270
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Research Unit, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias , Lima, Peru
                [2] 2Cognitive Decline and Dementia Diagnostic and Prevention Services Unit, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias , Lima, Peru
                [3] 3Neurology Department, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias , Lima, Peru
                [4] 4Neuromedicenter Adult Day Care Center , Quito, Ecuador
                [5] 5Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Científica del Sur , Lima, Peru
                [6] 6Neuropsychology and Clinical Neuroscience Laboratory (LANNEC), Physiopathology Department, ICBM, Neurosciences and East Neuroscience Departments, University of Chile School of Medicine , Santiago, Chile
                [7] 7Geroscience Center for Brain Health and Metabolism (GERO), University of Chile School of Medicine , Santiago, Chile
                [8] 8Memory and Neuropsychiatric Clinic (CMYN), Neurology Department, Del Salvador Hospital and University of Chile School of Medicine , Santiago, Chile
                [9] 9Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Alemana Clinic, Universidad del Desarrollo , Santiago, Chile
                Author notes

                Edited by: Johannes Schröder, Heidelberg University, Germany

                Reviewed by: Blas Couto, Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva, Argentina; Diego Salas-Gonzalez, University of Granada, Spain; Diego Castillo-Barnes, University of Granada, Spain, in collaboration with reviewer DS-G

                *Correspondence: Nilton Custodio ncustodio@ 123456ipn.pe
                Article
                10.3389/fnagi.2020.00270
                7500065
                32226375
                a168d0c1-5e68-44ad-b8ac-b67afba16294
                Copyright © 2020 Custodio, Duque, Montesinos, Alva-Diaz, Mellado and Slachevsky.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 March 2020
                : 04 August 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 82, Pages: 13, Words: 10636
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Systematic Review

                Neurosciences
                cognitive screening,dementia,alzheimer's disease,mild cognitive impairment,moca,latin america

                Comments

                Comment on this article