9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tolerogenic Immunomodulation by PEGylated Antigenic Peptides

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Current treatments for autoimmune disorders rely on non-specific immunomodulatory and global immunosuppressive drugs, which show a variable degree of efficiency and are often accompanied by side effects. In contrast, strategies aiming at inducing antigen-specific tolerance promise an exclusive specificity of the immunomodulation. However, although successful in experimental models, peptide-based tolerogenic “inverse” vaccines have largely failed to show efficacy in clinical trials. Recent studies showed that repetitive T cell epitopes, coupling of peptides to autologous cells, or peptides coupled to nanoparticles can improve the tolerogenic efficacy of peptides, suggesting that size and biophysical properties of antigen constructs affect the induction of tolerance. As these materials bear hurdles with respect to preparation or regulatory aspects, we wondered whether conjugation of peptides to the well-established and clinically proven synthetic material polyethylene glycol (PEG) might also work. We here coupled the T cell epitope OVA 323–339 to polyethylene glycols of different size and structure and tested the impact of these nano-sized constructs on regulatory (Treg) and effector T cells in the DO11.10 adoptive transfer mouse model. Systemic vaccination with PEGylated peptides resulted in highly increased frequencies of Foxp3 + Tregs and reduced frequencies of antigen-specific T cells producing pro-inflammatory TNF compared to vaccination with the native peptide. PEGylation was found to extend the bioavailability of the model peptide. Both tolerogenicity and bioavailability were dependent on PEG size and structure. In conclusion, PEGylation of antigenic peptides is an effective and feasible strategy to improve Treg-inducing, peptide-based vaccines with potential use for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, allergies, and transplant rejection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance.

          Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an indispensable role in maintaining immunological unresponsiveness to self-antigens and in suppressing excessive immune responses deleterious to the host. Tregs are produced in the thymus as a functionally mature subpopulation of T cells and can also be induced from naive T cells in the periphery. Recent research reveals the cellular and molecular basis of Treg development and function and implicates dysregulation of Tregs in immunological disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Encephalitogenic potential of the myelin basic protein peptide (amino acids 83-99) in multiple sclerosis: results of a phase II clinical trial with an altered peptide ligand.

            Myelin-specific T lymphocytes are considered essential in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. The myelin basic protein peptide (a.a. 83-99) represents one candidate antigen; therefore, it was chosen to design an altered peptide ligand, CGP77116, for specific immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis. A magnetic resonance imaging-controlled phase II clinical trial with this altered peptide ligand documented that it was poorly tolerated at the dose tested, and the trial had therefore to be halted. Improvement or worsening of clinical or magnetic resonance imaging parameters could not be demonstrated in this small group of individuals because of the short treatment duration. Three patients developed exacerbations of multiple sclerosis, and in two this could be linked to altered peptide ligand treatment by immunological studies demonstrating the encephalitogenic potential of the myelin basic protein peptide (a.a. 83-99) in a subgroup of patients. These data raise important considerations for the use of specific immunotherapies in general.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Immunomodulatory Nanosystems

              Abstract Immunotherapy has emerged as an effective strategy for the prevention and treatment of a variety of diseases, including cancer, infectious diseases, inflammatory diseases, and autoimmune diseases. Immunomodulatory nanosystems can readily improve the therapeutic effects and simultaneously overcome many obstacles facing the treatment method, such as inadequate immune stimulation, off‐target side effects, and bioactivity loss of immune agents during circulation. In recent years, researchers have continuously developed nanomaterials with new structures, properties, and functions. This Review provides the most recent advances of nanotechnology for immunostimulation and immunosuppression. In cancer immunotherapy, nanosystems play an essential role in immune cell activation and tumor microenvironment modulation, as well as combination with other antitumor approaches. In infectious diseases, many encouraging outcomes from using nanomaterial vaccines against viral and bacterial infections have been reported. In addition, nanoparticles also potentiate the effects of immunosuppressive immune cells for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Finally, the challenges and prospects of applying nanotechnology to modulate immunotherapy are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                09 October 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 529035
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Experimental Rheumatology, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum, a Leibniz Institute (DRFZ) , Berlin, Germany
                [2] 2 Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin , Berlin, Germany
                [3] 3 Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin , Berlin, Germany
                [4] 4 Celares GmbH , Berlin, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Barbara Metzler, Topas Therapeutics GmbH, Germany

                Reviewed by: Willem Van Eden, Utrecht University, Netherlands; Sylvaine You, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France; Eva M. Martinez-Caceres, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Spain

                *Correspondence: Alf Hamann, hamann@ 123456drfz.de

                †Present address: Mario Simonetti, Molecular and Cellular Immunology/Immune Regulation, Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Bianca von Thülen, Noack Laboratorien GmbH, Sarstedt, Germany

                This article was submitted to Immunological Tolerance and Regulation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2020.529035
                7581722
                a186fefc-58c6-42b3-bfd9-02a655347662
                Copyright © 2020 Pfeil, Simonetti, Lauer, Volkmer, von Thülen, Durek, Krähmer, Leenders, Hamann and Hoffmann

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 January 2020
                : 22 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 12, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 67, Pages: 17, Words: 9291
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659
                Award ID: CRC650, TP1
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 10.13039/501100002347
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie 10.13039/501100006360
                Categories
                Immunology
                Original Research

                Immunology
                immune tolerance,autoimmunity,peptide vaccination,nanoparticles,regulatory t cells
                Immunology
                immune tolerance, autoimmunity, peptide vaccination, nanoparticles, regulatory t cells

                Comments

                Comment on this article