8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cold-induced urticaria associated with type I cryoglobulinemia, successfully treated with rituximab

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Cold-induced urticaria (ColdU) is a common form of chronic inducible urticaria. It is characterized by the development of wheals and, sometimes, angioedema upon skin exposure to cold air, liquids, or objects. 1 Although considerable progress has been made over the last years in the understanding of the condition and its treatment, ColdU remains a challenging clinical problem. Patients often suffer from ColdU for years before they are diagnosed, and treatment requires a personalized approach. Similar to other forms of chronic urticaria, ColdU has a significant impact on quality of life. 1 Here, we describe a case of severe and refractory ColdU associated with cryoglobulinemia and successfully treated with rituximab. Case report A 60-year-old woman was referred to our Urticaria Center of Reference and Excellence 2 because of ColdU, from which she suffered since the age of 30. Localized pruritic wheals occurred when the ambient temperature was below approximately 18 °C for longer than 3-4 minutes, upon exposure to cold wind, or when touching cold objects. A cold provocation test (TempTest) was positive at a temperature of 18 °C and lower (Fig 1). The dermatology life quality index was 16, indicating a large impact on her quality of life. Fig 1 TempTest results at baseline (T0) showed a clear wheal-and-flare reaction between 4 °C (A) and 16-18 °C (B). Three months after rituximab therapy, the TempTest was negative (C). Her general medical history included hypertension and monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. The latter was diagnosed 7 years prior to presentation. A wait-and-see policy was maintained, since lymphocyte counts were stable during follow-up. The family history was negative for chronic urticaria and auto-inflammatory diseases. Treatment with at least 3 different H1-antihistamines at up to 4-fold of the standard dose, omalizumab dosed up to 600 mg every 4 weeks subcutaneously, and cyclosporin up to 5 mg/kg was unsuccessful. Because of the severe and refractory nature of her ColdU, further investigations were performed. This revealed type I cryoglobulins (monoclonal IgG), which were associated with the monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. No mutations associated with auto-inflammatory conditions were found with whole exome sequencing. We hypothesized that, in this patient, the cryoglobulins detected were of pathophysiologic importance for her ColdU and started treatment with rituximab, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody directed against CD20 that reduces autoantibody production via depletion of memory B-lymphocytes. The patient received 2 intravenous administrations of 1000 mg rituximab with a 2-week interval. Three months later, the patient reported a remarkable improvement of her symptoms. She could now walk outside at a temperature of 8 °C for 3 hours and was able to touch cold objects without developing signs or symptoms of ColdU. Also, the cold provocation test was now negative (Fig 1), the lymphocyte count normalized, and the cryoglobulin level decreased to 0.05 g/L (Table I). At the time of writing, the complete response was still maintained 7 months after rituximab treatment, and cryoglobulin levels were decreased further, to 0.02 g/L. Table I Laboratory results before and after treatment with rituximab Lab test [reference values/intervals] Before rituximab 3 months after rituximab 7 months after rituximab Cryoglobulins [<0.03 g/L] 0.18 g/L, type I monoclonal IgG 0.05 g/L 0.02 g/L IgE [<100 kU/L] 8 - - IgA [0.76-3.9 g/L] 0.67 0.71 0.73 IgG [7.0-16.0 g/L] 10.7 8.9 7.0 IgM [0.45-2.30 g/L] 0.27 0.25 0.27 C-reactive protein [<10 mg/L] 3.9 - 4.3 Erythrocyte sedimentation rate [0-30 mm/h] 17 - - Hemoglobin [7.5-9.5 mmol/L] 7.9 7.9 8.2 Leukocytes [3.5-10.0 × 109/L] 12.0 6.0 6.6 Lymfocytes [15%-50%] 73.9 37.2 36.9 Ig, Immunoglobulin. Discussion In this report we describe a case of complete clinical remission of ColdU associated with type I cryoglobulinemia after treatment with rituximab in a patient with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Cryoglobulins are immunoglobulins that precipitate at temperatures below 37 °C. Precipitation can cause occlusion of vessels, sometimes leading to immune-complex vasculitis and tissue damage. Cryoglobulins can be classified into 3 types according to clonality and type of immunoglobulin. Type 1 consists of monoclonal immunoglobulins, mostly IgG or immunoglobulin M and is mostly seen in clonal B-cell diseases. Type 2 describes a mixture of monoclonal immunoglobulin M and polyclonal IgG and is associated with autoimmune diseases and hepatitis C infection. A mixture of polyclonal immunoglobulin M and IgG can be classified as type 3 cryoglobulins. Dermatological findings in patients with cryoglobulinemia can include skin purpura, necrotic ulcers, cold-induced acrocyanosis, and the Raynaud phenomenon. 3 ColdU is a very rare manifestation of cryoglobulinemia, and the pathophysiology has not yet been elucidated. Our patient had classical, cursory wheals matching urticaria rather than vasculitis, which would be expected in typical cryoglobulinemic skin lesions. Potentially, the cryoglobulins in this particular case are matching an epitope on mast cells and basophils, causing IgG mediated degranulation. 4 Unfortunately, we did not perform a basophil or mast cell activation test, mostly because of the technical difficulties of working with cryoglobulins in vitro. However, the striking effect of B-cell depletion with rituximab corroborates the hypothetical presence of autoreactive immunoglobulins in this patient, and the clear association with ColdU suggests a pathophysiologic role for the cryoglobulins. Although rare, cryoglobulinemia should be considered in refractory ColdU. In a large French cohort study, 5 of 104 patients had cryoglobulinemia, 5 and a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 relevant studies with a total of 1151 ColdU patients showed that 3.0% (19/628) of patients had detectable levels of cryoglobulins. 6 Furthermore, we identified 2 case reports of relevance to our case. One described a 13-year-old boy with hepatitis B-associated type 2 cryoglobulinemia who developed ColdU. Upon clearance of the hepatitis B infection, his ColdU disappeared together with the cryoglobulins. 7 The other published case concerned a patient with cryoglobulinemia associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and ColdU as the only clinical manifestation. The patient was treated with chlorambucil 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks, followed by 2 mg/day maintenance and steroids. Hematologic remission ensued, and the ColdU improved, although complete remission was not achieved. 8 Lastly, in a cohort of 35 patients with ColdU, 46% had detectable cold agglutinins, and 27% had cryoglobulins. 9 None of these studies explored the potential of rituximab as treatment for cryoglobulin-associated ColdU. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets B-cells and has a position in the treatment of both autoimmune disorders; eg, rheumatoid arthritis and hematologic diseases. 10 The use of rituximab for ColdU is off-labeled and was administered in the setting of an academic hospital after multiple on-label treatments had proven to be unsuccessful. Off-label use of rituximab should at any time be carefully considered, as rituximab may provide serious adverse events. Infusion reactions are most common and can range from headache and fever up to bronchospasm, hypotension, and, in rare cases, anaphylaxis-like reactions. 11 In conclusion, cryoglobulinemia may underlie some cases of ColdU. The role of cryoglobulins in the pathophysiology of ColdU has not yet been elucidated in detail and requires further investigation. Until then, we propose testing for cryoglobulinemia in patients with refractory ColdU, and B-cell depleting therapy can be considered when cryoglobulins are detected. Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

          An open-label study indicated that selective depletion of B cells with the use of rituximab led to sustained clinical improvements for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To confirm these observations, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. We randomly assigned 161 patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate to receive one of four treatments: oral methotrexate (> or =10 mg per week) (control); rituximab (1000 mg on days 1 and 15); rituximab plus cyclophosphamide (750 mg on days 3 and 17); or rituximab plus methotrexate. Responses defined according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) were assessed at week 24 (primary analyses) and week 48 (exploratory analyses). At week 24, the proportion of patients with 50 percent improvement in disease symptoms according to the ACR criteria, the primary end point, was significantly greater with the rituximab-methotrexate combination (43 percent, P=0.005) and the rituximab-cyclophosphamide combination (41 percent, P=0.005) than with methotrexate alone (13 percent). In all groups treated with rituximab, a significantly higher proportion of patients had a 20 percent improvement in disease symptoms according to the ACR criteria (65 to 76 percent vs. 38 percent, P< or =0.025) or had EULAR responses (83 to 85 percent vs. 50 percent, P< or =0.004). All ACR responses were maintained at week 48 in the rituximab-methotrexate group. The majority of adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion: at 24 weeks, serious infections occurred in one patient (2.5 percent) in the control group and in four patients (3.3 percent) in the rituximab groups. Peripheral-blood immunoglobulin concentrations remained within normal ranges. In patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment, a single course of two infusions of rituximab, alone or in combination with either cyclophosphamide or continued methotrexate, provided significant improvement in disease symptoms at both weeks 24 and 48. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The biology of CD20 and its potential as a target for mAb therapy.

            CD20 is a 33-37 kDa, non-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of almost all normal and malignant B cells. It is also the target for rituximab, the most effective anti-cancer monoclonal antibody developed to date. Rituximab has now been given to over 300,000 lymphoma patients in the last decade and interestingly is now being explored for use in other disorders, such as autoimmune conditions including rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Despite the success in immunotherapy, knowledge about the biology of CD20 is still relatively scarce, partly because it has no known natural ligand and CD20 knockout mice display an almost normal phenotype. However, interesting insight has come from work showing that CD20 is resident in lipid raft domains of the plasma membrane where it probably functions as a store-operated calcium channel following ligation of the B cell receptor for antigen. In the current review, these and data relating to its activity as a therapeutic target will be discussed in depth. It is clear that a greater understanding of CD20 biology and the effector mechanisms, such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity and growth regulation, which operate with anti-CD20 mAb in vivo will allow more efficient exploitation of CD20 as a therapeutic target.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Autoimmune Theories of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

              Urticaria (hives) is a highly prevalent skin disorder that can occur with or without associated angioedema. Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a condition which persists for more than 6 weeks in duration and occurs in the absence of an identifiable provoking factor. CSU results from pathogenic activation of mast cells and basophils, which gives rise to the release of proinflammatory mediators that support the generation of urticaria. Several theories have been put forth regarding the pathogenesis of CSU with much evidence pointing toward a potential autoimmune etiology in up to 50% of patients with this condition. In this review, we highlight the evidence surrounding the autoimmune pathogenesis of chronic urticaria including recent data which suggests that CSU may involve contributions from both immunoglobin G (IgG)-specific and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-specific autoantibodies against a vast array of antigens that can span beyond those found on the surface of mast cells and basophils.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Reports
                Elsevier
                2352-5126
                11 November 2021
                January 2022
                11 November 2021
                : 19
                : 18-20
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Dermatology, Urticaria Center of Reference and Excellence (UCARE), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [b ]Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Allergy & Immunology, Urticaria Center of Reference and Excellence (UCARE), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [c ]Dermatological Allergology; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité, Urticaria Center of Reference and Excellence (UCARE), Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
                [d ]Department of Allergology and Immunology, Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Berlin, Germany
                Author notes
                []Correspondence to: Maud A. W. Hermans, MD, PhD, Erasmus MC, Internal Medicine, Room Rg533, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GC, Netherlands m.hermans@ 123456erasmusmc.nl
                Article
                S2352-5126(21)00810-9
                10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.10.032
                8640162
                34901362
                a1915fb7-b165-46b6-9fef-ee5660e21328
                © 2021 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier, Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Case Report

                cold-induced urticaria,cryoglobulinemia,inducible urticaria,rituximab,coldu, cold-induced urticaria,ig, immunoglobulin

                Comments

                Comment on this article