Improved digital chest tomosynthesis image quality by use of a projection-based dual-energy virtual monochromatic convolutional neural network with super resolution

Abstract

We developed a novel dual-energy (DE) virtual monochromatic (VM) very-deep super-resolution (VDSR) method with an unsharp masking reconstruction algorithm (DE–VM–VDSR) that uses projection data to improve the nodule contrast and reduce ripple artifacts during chest digital tomosynthesis (DT). For estimating the residual errors from high-resolution and multiscale VM images from the projection space, the DE–VM–VDSR algorithm employs a training network (mini-batch stochastic gradient-descent algorithm with momentum) and a hybrid super-resolution (SR) image [simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) total-variation (TV) first-iterative shrinkage–thresholding algorithm (FISTA); SART–TV–FISTA] that involves subjective reconstruction with bilateral filtering (BF) [DE–VM–VDSR with BF]. DE-DT imaging was accomplished by pulsed X-ray exposures rapidly switched between low (60 kV, 37 projection) and high (120 kV, 37 projection) tube-potential kVp by employing a 40° swing angle. This was followed by comparison of images obtained employing the conventional polychromatic filtered backprojection (FBP), SART, SART–TV–FISTA, and DE–VM–SART–TV–FISTA algorithms. The improvements in contrast, ripple artifacts, and resolution were compared using the signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR), Gumbel distribution of the largest variations, radial modulation transfer function (radial MTF) for a chest phantom with simulated ground-glass opacity (GGO) nodules, and noise power spectrum (NPS) for uniform water phantom. The novel DE–VM–VDSR with BF improved the overall performance in terms of SDNR (DE–VM–VDSR with BF: 0.1603, without BF: 0.1517; FBP: 0.0521; SART: 0.0645; SART–TV–FISTA: 0.0984; and DE–VM–SART–TV–FISTA: 0.1004), obtained a Gumbel distribution that yielded good images showing the type of simulated GGO nodules used in the chest phantom, and reduced the ripple artifacts. The NPS of DE–VM–VDSR with BF showed the lowest noise characteristics in the high-frequency region (~0.8 cycles/mm). The DE–VM–VDSR without BF yielded an improved resolution relative to that of the conventional reconstruction algorithms for radial MTF analysis (0.2–0.3 cycles/mm). Finally, based on the overall image quality, DE–VM–VDSR with BF improved the contrast and reduced the high-frequency ripple artifacts and noise.