27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Estimates and Determinants of Sexual Violence Against Women in the Democratic Republic of Congo

      research-article
      , PhD , , PhD, , PhD
      American Journal of Public Health
      American Public Health Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives. We sought to provide data-based estimates of sexual violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and describe risk factors for such violence.

          Methods. We used nationally representative household survey data from 3436 women selected to answer the domestic violence module who took part in the 2007 DRC Demographic and Health Survey along with population estimates to estimate levels of sexual violence. We used multivariate logistic regression to analyze correlates of sexual violence.

          Results. Approximately 1.69 to 1.80 million women reported having been raped in their lifetime (with 407 397–433 785 women reporting having been raped in the preceding 12 months), and approximately 3.07 to 3.37 million women reported experiencing intimate partner sexual violence. Reports of sexual violence were largely independent of individual-level background factors. However, compared with women in Kinshasa, women in Nord-Kivu were significantly more likely to report all types of sexual violence.

          Conclusions. Not only is sexual violence more generalized than previously thought, but our findings suggest that future policies and programs should focus on abuse within families and eliminate the acceptance of and impunity surrounding sexual violence nationwide while also maintaining and enhancing efforts to stop militias from perpetrating rape.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Researching domestic violence against women: methodological and ethical considerations.

          The results of three population-based studies on violence against women in Nicaragua are compared in this article. Two of the studies were regional in scope (León and Managua) and focused specifically on women's experiences of violence, whereas the third study was a Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted with a nationally representative sample of women. The lifetime prevalence estimates for women's undergoing physical violence from a partner were significantly higher in the León study (52 percent) and Managua study (69 percent), compared with that given in the DHS (28 percent). Possible explanations for the differences are examined through pooled multivariate logistic regression analysis, as well as analysis of six focus-group discussions carried out with field-workers and staff from the three studies. The most important differences that were found concerned ethical and safety procedures and the interview setting. The results indicate that prevalence estimates for violence are highly sensitive to methodological factors, and that underreporting is a significant threat to validity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Why Do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence, and Sexuality in the Armed Forces in the Congo (DRC)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A global overview of gender-based violence

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Am J Public Health
                ajph
                American Journal of Public Health
                American Public Health Association
                0090-0036
                1541-0048
                June 2011
                : 101
                : 6
                : 1060-1067
                Affiliations
                Amber Peterman is with the Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Tia Palermo is with the Graduate Program in Public Health, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY. Caryn Bredenkamp is with the Human Development Network, World Bank, Washington, DC.
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be sent to Amber Peterman, PhD, Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, 2033 K St, NW, Washington, DC 20006 (e-mail: a.peterman@ 123456cgiar.org ). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking on the “Reprints/Eprints” link.

                Peer Reviewed

                Note. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this article are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of IFPRI, Stony Brook University, or the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent.

                Contributors

                All of the authors contributed to the study design and analysis and to the drafting and revision of the article.

                Article
                PMC3093289 PMC3093289 3093289 300070
                10.2105/AJPH.2010.300070
                3093289
                21566049
                a2242904-5bb8-48ee-9837-6f0aa0ae697c
                © American Public Health Association 2011
                History
                : 10 November 2010
                Categories
                13
                26
                65
                81
                86
                Research and Practice

                Comments

                Comment on this article