8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efecto del ejercicio terapéutico en personas con disfunción de la articulación sacroiliaca: revisión sistemática y metanálisis Translated title: Effect of therapeutic exercise in persons with sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN Antecedentes y objetivo: La disfunción de la articulación sacroilíaca puede explicar el 40 % de los casos de dolor lumbar inespecífico. El ejercicio terapéutico (ET) es una modalidad de tratamiento recomendada para la rehabilitación de estos casos. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto del ET comparado con otras intervenciones, sobre la discapacidad y la intensidad del dolor en personas con disfunción o dolor sacroilíaco. Materiales y métodos: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis de ensayos clínicos aleatorios en los que se comparara el efecto de cualquier modalidad de ejercicio terapéutico sobre la intensidad del dolor o la discapacidad. Se determinó el riesgo de sesgo con la escala PEDro y la calidad de la evidencia según GRADE. Resultados: Se analizaron ocho estudios con 422 participantes en total. El ET se comparó con la terapia manual, la fijación quirúrgica de la articulación sacroilíaca, las modalidades físicas, la educación y el uso de cinturón pélvico. En general, el riesgo de sesgo en las publicaciones fue moderado. En el análisis cuantitativo, se encontró baja calidad de evidencia de que el ejercicio y la terapia manual logran el mismo efecto sobre la intensidad del dolor (MD-0,25 [IC 95 % -2,60 a 2,09]); asimismo, se registró baja calidad de evidencia para el efecto superior estimado a favor del ET comparado con la terapia manual sobre la discapacidad (MD -8,74 [IC 95 % -10,92 a - 6,67]). Conclusión: Existe evidencia de calidad baja y muy baja que sugiere que el ET es efectivo para reducir el dolor y la discapacidad en personas con DASI o dolor sacroilíaco. Registro PROSPERO: CRD42021236580.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Background and objective: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction can explain 40 % of the cases of non-specific low back pain. Therapeutic exercise (TE) is a recommended treatment modality for the rehabilitation of this cases. The objective was to assess the effect of TE versus another interventions, on disability and pain intensity in people with sacroiliac pain or dysfunction. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing the effect of any therapeutic exercise modality on pain intensity and/or disability. The risk of bias was determined with PEDro scale and the level of evidence according to GRADE. Results: Eight studies with 422 participants were analyzed. TE was compared with manual therapy, surgical fixation of the sacroiliac joint, physical modalities, education, and the use of a pelvic belt. Overall, the risk of bias was moderate. In the quantitative analysis, low quality of evidence was found about whether the exercise and manual therapy achieve the same effect on pain intensity (MD -0.25 [IC 95 % -2.60 a 2.09]); likewise, low quality of evidence was observed for the estimated superior effect in favor of ET compared to manual therapy on disability (MD -8,74 [IC 95 % -10.92 a - 6.67]). Conclusion: Low and very low-quality evidence suggests that TE is effective in reducing pain and disability in people with DASI or sacroiliac pain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency.

          This article deals with inconsistency of relative (rather than absolute) treatment effects in binary/dichotomous outcomes. A body of evidence is not rated up in quality if studies yield consistent results, but may be rated down in quality if inconsistent. Criteria for evaluating consistency include similarity of point estimates, extent of overlap of confidence intervals, and statistical criteria including tests of heterogeneity and I(2). To explore heterogeneity, systematic review authors should generate and test a small number of a priori hypotheses related to patients, interventions, outcomes, and methodology. When inconsistency is large and unexplained, rating down quality for inconsistency is appropriate, particularly if some studies suggest substantial benefit, and others no effect or harm (rather than only large vs. small effects). Apparent subgroup effects may be spurious. Credibility is increased if subgroup effects are based on a small number of a priori hypotheses with a specified direction; subgroup comparisons come from within rather than between studies; tests of interaction generate low P-values; and have a biological rationale. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictors of adherence to home-based physical therapies: a systematic review.

              Self-managed, home-based physical therapy (HBPT) is an increasingly common element of physical therapy rehabilitation programmes but non-adherence can reach 70%. Understanding factors that influence patients' adherence to HBPTs could help practitioners support better adherence. Research to date has focussed largely on clinic-based physiotherapy. The objective of this review, therefore, was to identify specific factors, which influence adherence to home-based, self-managed physical therapies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                dolor
                Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor
                Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor
                Inspira Network Group, S.L (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                1134-8046
                April 2023
                : 30
                : 2
                : 95-108
                Affiliations
                [1] Santander orgnameUniversidad Industrial de Santander orgdiv1Escuela de Fisioterapia Colombia
                Article
                S1134-80462023000200006 S1134-8046(23)03000200006
                10.20986/resed.2023.4034/2022
                a250ed48-1fed-4341-a60b-0044e5f91ebb

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 09 May 2023
                : 29 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 30, Pages: 14
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Originales

                revisión sistemática,Sacroiliac joint,terapia por ejercicio,rehabilitation,exercise therapy,systematic review,sacroilíaca,rehabilitación

                Comments

                Comment on this article