13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Research Faux Pas: The Stigma of Wikipedia

      Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian

      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references 4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Internet encyclopaedias go head to head.

           Jim Giles (2005)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Wikipedia as an evidence source for nursing and healthcare students

             Carol Haigh (2011)
            Where students once were confined to the University library, they are now at liberty to wander through cyber-space at will. There is evidence to suggest that student have been very quick to exploit the opportunities that the Internet can offer them. Students frequently cited search engines such as Google and Web 2.0 information sharing sites such as Wikipedia as the first places they look when seeking information for an assignment. Although a number of disciplines have accepted that Wikipedia can be viewed as an accurate and legitimate evidence source nurse educators tend to view Wikipedia with a degree of suspicion. The purpose of this paper is to carry out an exploratory study of health and health related content on a sample of Wikipedia site with the overall intention of assessing the quality of their source and supporting information. A 10% sample of health related Wikipedia entries were evaluated, with a total of 2598 references assessed. In total 1473 (56%) of the references citied on the Wikipedia pages reviewed could be argued to come from clearly identifiable reputable sources. This translates to a mean number of reputable sources of M=29 per Wikipedia entry. The quality of the evidence taken obtained from the 2500 plus references from over 50 Wikipedia pages was of sufficiently sound quality to suggest that, for health related entries, Wikipedia is appropriate for use by nursing students. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage

               Adam Brown (2011)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian
                Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian
                Informa UK Limited
                0163-9269
                1544-4546
                August 28 2015
                August 28 2015
                : 34
                : 3
                : 165-169
                Article
                10.1080/01639269.2015.1062587
                © 2015

                Comments

                Comment on this article